According to AP, congressional leaders have reached a deal on those economic stimulus checks. And rather than being geared towards helping the economy, they’re apparently geared towards redistributing wealth (that would be our wealth) to the poor. What a surprise. Folks in the middle (i.e, those who are not rich or poor) are screwed by the Democrats (and Republicans) yet again. Let me give you the details that just leaked, and again this may not be the final deal, but it sure sounds like it:
Families with children would receive an additional $300 per child, subject to an overall cap of perhaps $1,200, according to a senior House aide who outlined the deal on condition of anonymity in advance of formal adoption of the whole package. Rebates would go to people earning below a certain income cap, likely individuals earning $75,000 or less and couples with incomes of $150,000 or less.
That means that if you make $75,000 or more a year, no check for you. Forget that fact that you live in NYC or DC or San Francisco, where prices from property to food are outrageous. [...]
That’s because far too often the Democrats don’t give a damn about anybody who isn’t a minority or starving to death (both valid causes to be sure, but are they the ONLY causes out there?). If you’re in the middle, you’re on your own. [...]
The Republicans ONLY want to help the rich, and the Democrats ONLY want to help the poor. Screw everybody else. I am so sick of these people.
I’m glad that well-off white liberals are finally beginning to wake up to the fact that liberalism and the Democrat party has launched a blitzkreig offensive against them, the first stage in a “Final Solution” to the ”problem” that everybody isn’t a poor minority on welfare. Government handouts do nothing to allieviate poverty. The only way poor people can improve their situation is to pick themselves up by their bootstraps by having their mom hook them up with some right-wing media gigs, and then parlay that into paid public appearances and a fabulous book deal. Optionally, one could enter the jet-set world of professional blogging, with salaries starting at $75k and up. It’s pure laziness that keeps these people down, and we pay for it. Via.

January 25, 2008 at 11:33 am
Aravosis needs to read today’s Krugman.
January 25, 2008 at 12:06 pm
95 percent of US households have incomes below $150,000. Are 95% of Americans poor? (And if so, why is it so wrong for the Dems to only care about the poor?)
I had thought Aravosis was one of the good guys. Time to recalibrate.
January 25, 2008 at 12:15 pm
And fear not, Megan McArdle is fighting the Good Fight:
January 25, 2008 at 12:19 pm
Yeah, how come poor people are so fat. They could eat each other’s bodies for free. Food is the last thing they need.
January 25, 2008 at 12:26 pm
Hey, you guys are back! I’m so happy.
aimai
January 25, 2008 at 12:34 pm
Thank you, americablog. I had assumed that my $80K/yr base salary prevented me from being a complete asshat. John has helped me see the light.
Now how much does the gov’t have to hand out to me so that I can afford to make Aravosis STFU?
(o0)
//|\
January 25, 2008 at 12:48 pm
Hey, why didn’t McArdle blurb “Liberal Fascism”? The Eds should send her a review copy. McArdle needs to get on this train.
January 25, 2008 at 1:11 pm
I’ve had to stop reading Aravosis. He has a propensity for histrionics that overruns his facts. The fine folks at Eschaton don’t do this. The fine folks at Digby’s don’t do this.
And The Editors. Oh, The Editors… What can I say?
No, really… What?
January 25, 2008 at 1:33 pm
One thing is clear: If every proprosal or compromise by the Democratic Party does not solve all of America’s problems, then Democrats hate middle americans like John Aravois.
January 25, 2008 at 7:42 pm
Oh for god’s sake, John, it’s not a gift certificate from grandma and all the grandkids should get the same. It’s intended as an economic stimulant and pragmatically, people below a certain income level are more apt to spend the money quickly than those who can afford to sock it into savings.
I wish the government would spend the money on infrastructure repair, but instead we have to go to the mall so that we don’t end up eating dirt down the road. Something like that. I’m no Econ major.
January 25, 2008 at 11:17 pm
Pitkin, I’m afraid Aravosis has a long history as a complete and total asshat. Here’s the procedure:
1. Aravosis makes sexist/racist/spoiledrichwhiteguy post.
2. Many commenters object, some politely, some not so politely.
3. Aravosis wails, gnashes teeth, foams at the mouth at how cruel and vicious his commenters are, no matter how politely they’ve disagreed with him.
4. Suddenly, the comment thread in question goes from 600 comments to 20 oh-I-wish-I-could-be-as-perfect-as-you comments. Hundreds of commenters are banned for the crime of disagreeing with the holy one.
January 25, 2008 at 11:21 pm
Looks like Aravosis pulled the post.
Lame, John, Lame.
January 26, 2008 at 9:03 am
Hey, 75,300 is a significant improvement over 75,000.
January 28, 2008 at 8:33 am
So Aravosis considers anybody making under 75K to be below middle class?
Man, to be so privileged.
January 29, 2008 at 12:16 am
[...] are laid out on the deck you can take an important stand for chief illiniwek sucks to be you making 75 large not enough money to hire a charles in charge I got a house you should be inhabitin’ a GOP [...]
January 29, 2008 at 1:08 pm
[...] and was also blasted by Liza at Feminist Bloggers Network, KayInMaine at White Noise Insanity, The Editors at Poorman.com, calipygian at DailyKos, zuzu at Feministe, Andrew at Air Pollution, and [...]