March 28, 2008
On his radio show yesterday, Hugh Hewitt played excerpts of Barack Obama reading from his autobiography, Dreams of My Father.
Journalism: you’re soaking in it! On my internet weblog today, I will excerpt Mickey excerpting Hewitt excerpting Barack excerpting Rev. Wright:
It is this world, a world where cruise ships throw away more food in a day than most residents of Port-au-Prince see in a year, where white folks’ greed runs a world in need, aprtheid in one hemisphere, apathy in another hemisphere … That’s the world! On which hope sits.”
Deep thoughts by Mickey Kaus:
Sounds … controversial! Keep in mind: a)Obama isn’t disapproving of this sermon. In the book he weeps at the end of it; b)Demonstrating that at least some blaming of “white greed” for the world’s sins–which Obama now criticizes– isn’t an exceptional topic for Rev. Wright in a few wacky sermons (”the five dumbest things“) that Obama may or may not have missed. It’s at the quotidian core of the Afrocentric philosophy that Obama says drew him to the church; c) Indeed, in his big Feb. 18th race speechObama reads the passage from his book that describes his emotional reaction to this very sermon (his “first service at Trinity”)–how it made “the story of a people” seem “black and more than black.” d)This is also the sermon that gave Obama the title of his next book, The Audacity of Hope. e) The “profound mistake” of this sermon is not that Wright “spoke as if our society was static”–Obama’s analysis on Feb. 18th. The problem is that “white folks’ greed” is not the main cause of a “world in need.”
Well, that’s one problem. The other problem is that God/gods is/are made up hooey; religion as cosmology insults the intelligence of anyone over the age of 7; that most people use church to catch up on their sleep; that they aren’t missing anything; that nobody ever reads the Bible because it’s so God-awful dull; that they aren’t missing anything, either; and that nobody actuallybelieves any of it, or even really knows what it is they are claiming to believe on pain of eternal sermonizing. Oh, and also Rev. Wright conflated “rich people” with “white people”, much like you conflate “people who share my opinion that Obama voters are voting for a skin tone” with “white voters in heartland states I’ve read about in David Brooks’ Adventure Tales for Aristocratic Boys“. Or like you appear to have - judging by the well-digested passage above - conflated claims of rich/white people’s indifference to suffering with their creation of suffering. Although it’s very hard to tell, as you haven’t done even the minimal work of actually reading the book and determining if maybe - perish the thought! - talk radio Hugh Hewitt might not be the most objective source of information on the planet. (Imaginary Kaus counters: well why don’t you do the ‘minimal work’, then? A: I learned it by watching you!) Better yet, why not pay attention to something that isn’t the most overexposed who-fucking-gives-a-shit fad/story of the moment?
Darling Mickey is at this, I believe, because he wants someone to call him “a racist”. He wants someone to point out, for example, how Tom DeLay - at the time one of the most powerful figures in government - regularly blamed all the worlds’ sufferings on uppity wimmins and public schoolin’, and Mickey and his ilk all pretended nobody farted, and he wants someone to believe this discrepency is do to racial bias, rather than, say, being a hack who everyone should [continue to] ignore. I believe he wants this to happen so someone will pay attention to him, so that he can finally move on from Slate.com, the Home for Wayward “Sensible” Wing-Nuts Who Can’t Even Get Gigs At The Atlantic. Or maybe he’s just as bored as his readers. Unfortunately, I can’t very well call him “a racist” until he says something racist, so I’m going to have to continue to call him “a very boring person with silly eyebrows and a wholey unnatural interest in talk radio sillyperson Hugh Hewitt’s interpretations of the sermons of the Right Rev. Some Black Guy I Don’t Fucking Care About.” Or you could find something more useful to do with your time than novelizations of Hugh Hewitt shows. (Someone needs to do a sermon about the spiritual and moral costs of boring me to death. God will Smite and Damn America if she persists in being such a wicked snore!)
Full disclosure: I tried to read Dreams of My Father a while back. It was awful. Nobody should write an autobiography at the age of 30. Nobody. Not as dire as the Bible, but still pretty tedious. Note to authors: more and better dick jokes!
Sounds … controversial! Keep in mind: a)Obama isn’t disapproving of this sermon. In the book he weeps at the end of it; b)Demonstrating that at least some blaming of “white greed” for the world’s sins–which Obama now criticizes– isn’t an exceptional topic for Rev. Wright in a few wacky sermons (”
March 28, 2008 at 10:27 am
Slate.com, the Home for Wayward “Sensible” Wing-Nuts Who Can’t Even Get Gigs At The Atlantic.
Exactly.
March 28, 2008 at 1:25 pm
Obama should have written More and Better Dick Jokes of my Father. He would win in a landslide.
March 28, 2008 at 1:28 pm
Full disclosure: I tried to read Dreams of My Father a while back. It was awful. Nobody should write an autobiography at the age of 30. Nobody.
Different strokes…
I liked it a lot, thought it gave me a reasonably good idea of what Obama is like and who he is. Audacity of Hope on the other hand struck me as campaign boilerplate - well done for its type, but its type isn’t worth wasting time over (except maybe for political junkies).
March 28, 2008 at 1:29 pm
A: I learned it by watching you!
You rule.
March 28, 2008 at 1:43 pm
Note to authors: more and better dick jokes!
Not just better, girthier!
March 28, 2008 at 1:47 pm
I’m hoping someone will tell me I’m wrong and I should give it another try. Sometimes I’m just in the wrong mood for a given book or something.
March 28, 2008 at 2:03 pm
I have to agree, no one should write an autobiography at the age of thirty. Unless they are an Olympic women’s gymnast or something and their career is basically already over.
March 28, 2008 at 2:52 pm
I also liked “Dreams From My Father.” It was not exactly the most brilliantly written memoir ever, but it did give me a sense of who Obama is and how he thinks. In that way it impressed me a lot because he seems to have the type of mind that I really admire.
With all that has been in the news lately I am even more glad that I read it because while everyone is wringing their hands about his attitude toward his pastor and his grandmother and whatnot, I have enough background knowledge to shed some light on the subject.
If Obama ends up being the nominee I hope that a lot more progressives read it so that we can help defend against the inevitable “secret Muslim” and “Black separatist” and whatever other crazy storylines the noise machine comes up with.
March 28, 2008 at 3:01 pm
where white folks’ greed runs a world in need
For shame! So many of the people who run the world are not white! Such as
uh
um
What? okay, i’ll be right there! Sorry someone’s calling me away.
March 28, 2008 at 3:04 pm
…is that passage in the book though?
March 28, 2008 at 3:11 pm
And you’re totally right. What business does someone have writing an autobiography just because his father was a black African and his mother a white American who struggled to rais him by herself before marrying an Asian man and moving them to Indonesia where he lived amid war and revolution before returning to the US to struggle with racial identity in a country he barely remembered, eventually becoming the first black president of the Harvard Law Review and joining the corporate sector but becoming disenchanted and moving to Chicago to learn community organizing from the bottom up in one of America’s most desperate communities, success at which spurred him to travel half a world away and trace his roots to Nigeria where he finally made peace with who he is and where he can go in the future?
I’ll take another Stephen King “monster jumps out of nowhere and slaughters innocent women and children” potboiler please!
March 28, 2008 at 3:31 pm
religion as cosmology insults the intelligence of anyone over the age of 7
Weren’t James Joyce, William Blake, Thomas Merton, Charles Taylor, Dante Alighieri, authors of De Civitate Dei, Mulamadhyamakakarika, past the sippy cup stage?
March 28, 2008 at 3:34 pm
Notorious P.A.T.:
Did that Jesus character do all that? No! He barely ever made it out of Judea and Galilee and his father was a sadistic attention whore who created the heavens and all in it, yet was still jealous when people worshipped gold cows.
Therefore: Obama > Jesus
March 28, 2008 at 3:37 pm
None, of course, though if I could stop people from writing memoirs wouldn’t I have unleashed it many “I’m somewhat pretty and had a tedious upper-middle class drug habit” best-sellers ago? Of course I would. The question isn’t “didn’t I have a cosmopolitan childhood?” - many perfectly dull people travel and have mixed parentage - the question is: why should I care? Because if my goal in life is reading books by people from unusual backgrounds, there’s probably books out there by transsexual alien abductees who overcame white slavery and spontaneous combustion to win 7 gold medals at the 1998 X-games, and, seeing as my free time is severely limited by constantly having to answer damn fool questions on the internet, why should I read Obama’s instead? A typical 30 year-old doesn’t answer this question adequately because when you are thirty you typically assume that “interesting” is what comes between “29″ and “31″. Although if the 30-year-old then becomes president, one may have to grit one’s teeth and try again.
March 28, 2008 at 3:44 pm
I don’t know, because I don’t know who most of those people are. But Joyce was a lush, Blake spent evenings in conversation with a managere of exotic imaginary friends, and I suspect a combination of medieval circumstances and childhood trauma can account for the rest. Or else they injoyed having their intelligence insulted. How the fuck should I know? Ask them, not me.
March 28, 2008 at 3:56 pm
Well, Charles Taylor, Chuck, to his friends, made a helluva sneaker. That or he was that bastard who ran Liberia.
March 28, 2008 at 4:55 pm
I’ll take another Stephen King “monster jumps out of nowhere and slaughters innocent women and children” potboiler please!
Not too many dick jokes there, either, in my experience. Philip Roth’s a better bet.
March 28, 2008 at 5:16 pm
I’ll take another Stephen King “monster jumps out of nowhere and slaughters innocent women and children” potboiler please!
Not too many dick jokes there, either, in my experience. Philip Roth’s a better bet.
Are you kidding me? The Shining is nothing but dick jokes. The guy’s name is Jack! He tries to kill people with a mallet! The steam in the boiler builds and builds and builds until it just has to be released in a massive, explosive spurt!!
If you don’t see the dick jokes in King’s books, my friend, you simply aren’t looking…
March 28, 2008 at 6:15 pm
Way too serious for this blog, but check out Barbara O’Brien’s posts on the subject over the past few years at Mahablog. She does a not-bad job…
Charles Taylor is a Canadian philosopher who never experienced childhood trauma or medieval circumstances to my knowledge…
March 28, 2008 at 6:21 pm
… or he’s Canadian, I forgot to add.
March 28, 2008 at 6:24 pm
Touche.
March 28, 2008 at 11:24 pm
Let’s see…water is wet, fire burns, things fall down instead of up, Mickey Kaus is a hack…yes, everything is still right with the world.
March 28, 2008 at 11:43 pm
The Editors- Are you trying to rehabilitate Amy Sullivan’s reputation or something?
I don’t think you should make fun of decent Christians. Some people need to believe in divine justice to get through their day. You ought to sympathise. None of the Republicans in office today are going to pay any significant penalty for their crimes in this life. If you were the kind of person to dwell on that fact, you’d find it god damned depressing.
Since you are so certain God doesn’t exist why don’t you prove it?
If you can’t maybe you could think about the fact that your certainty that God isn’t real is just a different faith. There is probably a good reason why you don’t want to believe in an all powerful god who loves you, but I’d bet you’d be happier if you could. You might also find yourself open to personal growth in a way you weren’t before.
March 29, 2008 at 12:21 am
God help us.
Frank - There is a fantastic reason I don’t believe in an all-powerful God who loves me, and it’s the same reason that all non-Christians don’t believe in an all-powerful who loves them - it’s a silly idea with no evidence. Seriously, that’s literally what 80% of the world thinks, and what 99% of everyone who has ever lived believed. Somehow, we all get through the day, either by believing something equally absurd and undisprovable, or just by accepting that some things are beyond us and moving on. You aren’t entitled to wave it away by pretending I’m “making fun of decent Christians” - I’m just expressing what non-Christians, by definition, think. Being condescended to by you means as much to me as being condescended to be the Jehovah’s Witnesses or the Hari Krishnas, or as much as it probably means to you when Buddhists sadly cluck about what a miserable person you must be for not accepting that the world doesn’t exist - it means that condescending people are being condescending to you on the basis of centuries-old piffle. I might be happier if I went around pretending some supernatural nonsense and talking down to people who don’t, but not as happy as I’d be if I ate a handful of tylox. Doing whatever makes one happy is not the noblest human aspiration.
And who the fuck is Amy Sullivan?
March 29, 2008 at 12:45 am
<i?None of the Republicans in office today are going to pay any significant penalty for their crimes in this life.
Then, really, what’s the point? Having no confidence in the afterlife, I hope that in my time and ken, I see these fuckers suffer some kind of indignity — massive loss of public confidence, terrible 2008 showing, jailtime — but lacking that, what in any sense is the point? I don’t remember my last life, but even if I didn’t have one, what the fuck does that have to do with Armageddon?
Do you understand what I’m saying?
March 29, 2008 at 3:34 am
And who the fuck is Amy Sullivan?
A concern troll who’s concerned that the Democratic Party isn’t as dominated by religious fanatics as the GOP is.
March 29, 2008 at 6:28 am
And who the fuck is Amy Sullivan?
It’s bad enough knowing who Mickey Kaus is; I advise you to let this question rest.
March 29, 2008 at 8:55 am
… That said, what cosmology someone happens to believe in is a matter of very little practical consequence - provided one avoids actively working to end the world or blowing up 3,000 people to get afterlife virgin orgies or shit like that - so live and let live. But for most people, the news that unsupportable claims about the way the world works were made at someone else’s religious service is not exactly news.
March 29, 2008 at 10:23 am
“Weren’t James Joyce, William Blake, Thomas Merton, Charles Taylor, Dante Alighieri, authors of De Civitate Dei, Mulamadhyamakakarika, past the sippy cup stage?”
Yes, and if they lived now, and were hep to the expanding universe and the jillions-of- stars-in-kabillions-of-galaxies deal, and knew as we know how wrong the Bible was about everything in the physical world, they wouldn’t have believed (as we don’t) that, in the immortal words (paraphrased) of Sam Harris, that “God personally created 360,000 species of beetles.”
March 29, 2008 at 11:01 am
You are so full of shit sometimes Andy. If you were being funny I wouldn’t bother to point this out but you are wrong, repeatedly and obviously on the numbers.
For one thing there are closer to two billion Christian than one. For another Muslims also believe in an all powerful God that loves them. More than half of the people now living believe in God and that is way more than one percent of all the people who have ever lived.
Just so you know I go to church weekly and most of the people there manage to stay awake throughout the service. Also many of my neighbors have read through the bible more than once.
Amy Sullivan IS a concern troll. Her schtick is to bewail how hostile the Democratic party is to Christians and claim that if Christians were made to feel welcome the Democratic party would be more successful. Usually I dismiss her. I’m not going to threaten to change parties just because you are being a jerk, but you are making it look like she has a point.
Lots of people have had personal religeous experiences. When you say “There is a fantastic reason I don’t believe in an all-powerful God who loves me, and it’s the same reason that all non-Christians don’t believe in an all-powerful who loves them - it’s a silly idea with no evidence” you are in essence saying who are you going to believe; me or your lying eyes?
I’m not sure why you think I’m condescending to you. Maybe you could clarify? I’ve never felt condescended to by a buddhist.
Being happy may not be the noblest human aspiration, but I don’t see anything wrong with it, and all other things equal I would like to be happy.
March 29, 2008 at 11:30 am
I’m happy to see that an intractable and useless theology debate is being started in light of a throwaway comment that Eddy aka “the Editors” made. But for what it’s worth, I tend to be of the opinion that the recognition that the problem of evil really is an actual problem is litmus test for whether or not a person is a sociopath. In no particular order: you can disbelieve in God, or not care about gods, or believe that God is a nice old wizard trapped under the sea, or that God is Satan’s alternate personality, or that God is a nice-guy deity with a short attention span, or that God is just a watch-maker with good intentions and not a lot of control over the ticks. But if you think that God is all powerful, all knowing, and benevolent, I’m going to need you to either start making sense or stay the hell away from me and my family.
March 29, 2008 at 11:34 am
What Mal? You don’t believe that we live in the best of all possible worlds?
March 29, 2008 at 11:47 am
Perhaps, but hardly any of them believe in your God. Muslims believe in an all-powerful God who loves them, not you. You disbelieve in all divinities that have ever been believed to exist, minus one. I disbelieve in all those, plus one more. I miss Him like we both miss Zeus - not a bit. Assuming otherwise is - like belief in an all-powerful God who loves you - a self-serving belief with no evidential basis. If I were to decide to believe something like that, I’d just believe I was Tom Brady.
Again, I neither know nor care who this person is. But you are clearly very upset that I would point out that belief in your God is - in my view and in the view of nearly every other who has ever lived - a peculiar thing to believe. You find it jerky, when it is simply true. Atheists, agnostics, Buddhists, Hindus, Muslims, animists, Scientologists, Catholics, Mormons, and heathens of all descriptions past, present and future all believe that what you believe is absurd. Additionally, many of them believe in an all powerful God who loves them very much and is sending you straight to Hell forever. This is definitionally true. You can try to Unitarian your way around this, and say anybody who believes in any sort of undetectable anthromorphic superbeing is basically in agreement with you, but that’s not what most religious people believe. If calling me a jerk makes you feel better about these true things, feel free, as believing self-serving nonsense seems to give you something beyond value. But you know as well as anyone that people outside your particular religion view you the same way you view them, in the same condescending and self-righteous way.
Right. Or people who see Bigfoot. Or get abducted by aliens. Or have all sorts of subjective and extraordinary experiences which leave behind no evidence. They can believe whatever they like. That’s their business. I don’t have to honor it.
God told me you were. Don’t you dare question this or you’re a big jerk.
And who the fuck is Andy?
March 29, 2008 at 1:29 pm
Frank, I have a couple of different snarky replies (choose according to best fit):
a. Goofy reply: If this were the best world ever then velcro shoes would be mandatory.
b. Metaphysical reply: the real world is the only possible world.
c. Literary reply: Leibniz was fat and sassy, Voltaire much less so.
d. Hedonistic reply: I’m much happier as an atheist than I am believing in the reasonable God-options, because those options are all either depressing or terrifying. And I’m not the sort of person that is capable of denying the problem of evil (not enough brain damage). But if I were, then all evidence suggests that the main consequence would be that my blissful stupor would lead me to act in ways that make other people entirely miserable.
March 29, 2008 at 1:43 pm
That Unitarian bit really is pretty good. I was raised Unitarian and I guess it shows.
If I bought your claim about my God being different from everyone else’s all of the different believers all have their own individual faiths. Since inevitably each will have a slightly different concept of God or the rules she requires us to obey.
Plenty of people of faith would hesitate from claiming that any particular person is going to hell. Or maybe you think I personally am such a big sinner that everyone is in agreement about me.
I’m not claiming that you aren’t/shouldn’t be permitted disbelief, though God may differ. I reacted because you made your contempt clear and didn’t seem to have your facts straight.
Ok, Billions of people believe in the divine and a tiny minority of the human population reject any form of supernatural belief. But we are the strange ones.
I don’t find that idea upsetting, more amusing really, but you could have been more polite about it. Or failing that, you could have thrown in a dick joke.
March 29, 2008 at 1:51 pm
Mal- Your answers here seem pretty personal I don’t have enough information about what they mean to you to argue. Thats ok by me, I’m not spoiling for a fight.
The Editors seems to be and I enjoy responding to that. Aren’t you Andrew Northrup? If not I apologize.
March 29, 2008 at 2:14 pm
My contempt. I’m married to a Catholic, was married in the Church, was born and raised in a very Catholic neighborhood, etc., and have never had any problems with anybody who respected my desire not to be converted or pitied. I just don’t believe in any of it, and I don’t pretend I do, and I don’t feel the need to keep my beliefs (or lack thereof) quiet while everybody else spouts off about how superior their lives are because they believe in God/Allah/Buddha/UFOs/whatever. I also don’t accept that stories about the people in your neighborhood trump the fact that the vast majority of people do not believe anything like what you believe. Please: go to Baghdad, go to Belfast, go to Israel/Palestine and explain the pan-monotheist worldwide lovefest which you’ve just outlined for me - they’d probably be very interested to hear about how fully in agreement they are and how insubstantial are their differences. I’m sorry you don’t think I was being polite enough - next time I’ll follow your example and call you an ignorant jerk and say you’re full of shit. Perhaps you can give me the Biblical verse that has inspired that beatific approach.
Am I? That’s not what it says on my byline, is it? What’s your full name, while we’re such good friends?
March 29, 2008 at 2:38 pm
… oh, now I discover it’s really the unity of all who hold “any form of supernatural belief”. Off to Kashmir with you! Those jerks clearly don’t have their facts straight!
March 29, 2008 at 2:39 pm
While we are on the subject of what you believe lets review from the original post. “The other problem is that God/gods is/are made up hooey; religion as cosmology insults the intelligence of anyone over the age of 7; that most people use church to catch up on their sleep; that they aren’t missing anything; that nobody ever reads the Bible because it’s so God-awful dull; that they aren’t missing anything, either; and that nobody actuallybelieves any of it, or even really knows what it is they are claiming to believe on pain of eternal sermonizing.”
And then a little later: “all non-Christians don’t believe in an all-powerful who loves them - it’s a silly idea with no evidence. Seriously, that’s literally what 80% of the world thinks, and what 99% of everyone who has ever lived believed.”
But no you didn’t show any contempt for religeous folk. And as the kind of idiot who believes this con I’m supposed to be too holy to call your shit out for the shit it is.
I only made the comment about people in my neighborhood because you said: “that nobody ever reads the Bible because it’s so God-awful dull” and I knew I wouldn’t be enough of a counterexample for you.
This is like you third or forth website The Editors. You used to put your name up on the articles. If you ever announced you didn’t want to use your real name anymore I didn’t read it. We aren’t friends, but if you need my full name its in my E-mail addy.
March 29, 2008 at 2:47 pm
Frank, oh, not personal at all. Quite happy to explain:
1. Velcro is a wonderful invention and we would all be better off if we used it more.
2. The notion of “possibility” is a theoretical notion that is only useful or intelligible in describing the conceivable future states of the real world. Talk about “possible worlds” is a nice fiction that we use to do smartypants things with logic and probability theory or whatever. Not very good when it comes to God-talk.
3. “The best of all possible worlds” was a phrase used by rationalist Enlightenment philosopher and world-renowned fatty, Gottfreid Leibniz, in his defense of the existence of God. This was spoofed in one of Voltaire’s plays — “Candide”, I think. I was tactlessly to your reference in the least useful way I could think of. Thanks for playing along.
4. If you believe a contradiction, or disbelieve in evidence — that is, if you deny that the problem of evil matters, or you you think it isn’t a problem — you are probably not the kind of person who I would be comfortable around, to say the least. And among those options that are both consistent and consistent with the evidence, I find that atheism is the most comforting.
March 29, 2008 at 2:49 pm
>>I’m not claiming that you aren’t/shouldn’t be permitted disbelief, though God may differ.<<
Hey, if I go to church every week, will I be a font of magnanimity too?
March 29, 2008 at 2:57 pm
That’s right - I don’t. Thank you again, dude on the internet who I don’t know, for more of your sincere concern in this matter, but no, I don’t have any problem in this department. I just don’t believe any of it, at all. For the same reason that
80%70% of all now living believe nothing of the sort - there’s no evidence for it, and the idea of people coming back from the dead and talking to a magical tripartite deity is a fundamentally silly idea which calls for some rather extensive documentation. Believe all the silly things you like - most everyone else does. But don’t assume that the superiority you grant your beliefs will be respected by people who just consider them someone else’s silliness. I understand that such an assumption makes you feel special, and that you choose to believe things based on whether they make you happy, but try to understand that the world doesn’t revolve around your ego.March 29, 2008 at 3:18 pm
Again Dude I don’t know from adam I never said you had to be religeous. I never tried to convert you. I just objected to the way you put down and dismissed everyone who does believe in God.
You might point out that its no skin off my nose and its true. There is a perfectly nice day outside I can enjoy. Later.
March 29, 2008 at 3:24 pm
As good an end as could be expected. To Other Readers: I hope you were not shocked and alarmed to discover that people who aren’t Christian don’t believe in Christianity. Please understand that it’s nothing personal. Carry on.
March 29, 2008 at 4:24 pm
See, I still feel bad for you, Editors, because I really am one of those straw-man atheists who are wary of theists on a social level, whereas you’re a relatively nice guy who thinks God-talk makes no practical difference. I’m sure it must be a pain for mainstream secular humanists when guys like me get confused with guys like you.
Luckily, guys like me usually only show up on blogs and in Dixie nightmares.
March 29, 2008 at 7:31 pm
This one’s for you, Editors. Dawkins, Dennett, PZ Myers inna Haaause!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaGgpGLxLQw
March 30, 2008 at 2:26 am
Karen Armstrong, bitches!
March 30, 2008 at 8:41 am
Semi–
V. interesting. From where?
Pedantic footnote: Candide was a novel. Then it was a musical, but not until much later.
March 30, 2008 at 12:02 pm
Semi: that video was better than sex. But then again, I’m not very good at sex, so… you know.
MrW: thx. I was probably dozing during my english class. Leibniz was still fat though.
March 30, 2008 at 4:36 pm
How did we all survive work before the internet?
March 30, 2008 at 8:02 pm
V. interesting. From where?
The Karen Armstrong is from this book.
I got the video from this site (the timing of the video’s release is eerie considering the recent fracas over there…) I don’t know who did it.
March 31, 2008 at 8:55 am
Pedantic footnote: Candide was a novel. Then it was a musical, but not until much later.
Yup, Voltaire can be a pretty effective wrecking ball. So much so that his head was appointed to replace certain lopped off ones at a certain point, and in general the self-appointed philosopher king business didn’t seem to go so well…
March 31, 2008 at 11:20 am
There is a perfectly nice day outside I can enjoy. Later.
It’s always sad when the last candy falls out of the pinata.