Dan Froomkin is out-of-touch with the mainstream Americans who get bitten by sharks and go to NASCAR races and Washington journalism award shows:
As the Bush presidency staggers to an end, it’s hard to say who has less to brag about: the president or the journalists who cover him. So it’s fitting that the last White House Correspondents’ Association dinner of the Bush era — the ultimate celebration of chumminess between the most powerful people in the world and those who are supposed to hold them accountable — was a dispiriting, mostly humorless affair.
President Bush phoned in his appearance, uttering a few topical one-liners but leaning primarily on greatest-hits footage from previous performances — and wrapping up with a cartoonish but crowd-pleasing “conducting” of the Marine band.
Comedian Craig Ferguson essentially apologized in advance for his understated headlining performance — a far cry from the withering diatribe delivered by Stephen Colbert two years ago. [...]
In the audience at the dinner and at its endless pre- and post-parties, a fin-de-siecle degeneracy was on full display. Throngs surrounded aging professional floozy Pamela Anderson, a guest of Bloomberg, who happily posed for countless photos in a dress that exposed the preponderance of her two most outstanding achievements. Key members of the White House’s torture-management team– Cheney, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, former secretary of state Colin Powell — along with leading torture apologists — Attorney General Michael Mukasey, CIA Director Michael Hayden, former White House spokesman Tony Snow and current spokeswoman Dana Perino — were fawned over as honored guests.
In one of his few winning lines, Bush made this astute observation: “Pamela Anderson and Mitt Romney in the same room? Isn’t that one of the signs of the apocalypse?” At the end of his speech, the man who waged war against the press received a standing ovation from the conquered.
Broderella is not amused.
May 1, 2008 at 1:09 pm
good stuff from Froomkin. The last honest man in Washington.
May 1, 2008 at 2:43 pm
Froomkin re the Colbert speech at the Press Dinner:
But I think that message was just too much for the self-satisfied upper crust of the media elite to handle when Colbert threw it right in their faces on Saturday night. Here they were, holding a swanky party for themselves, and Colbert was essentially telling them that they’ve completely screwed up their number one job these past six years. Is it any surprise they were defensive?
Perfect.
May 1, 2008 at 3:56 pm
Standing ovation? That is just wrong.
May 1, 2008 at 8:12 pm
WTF— they gave the moron a standing ovation—-????
Jesus wept.
What a corrupt band of cocksuckers.
May 2, 2008 at 12:37 am
Dan Froomkin took the red shrill.
…
OK, I know, that shtick is pretty tired by now. Still, I had to read that column twice, sitting down. I’m just not accustomed to this kind of truth-telling coming from the Washington PosTimes.
Does Fred Hiatt know that Froomkin works there?
I’m not the least bit gay (and I mean that literally, not Larry Craig ‘I’m not gay’), but I swear I want to marry Froomkin.
May 2, 2008 at 3:25 am
I think you must be a little gay.
May 2, 2008 at 7:53 am
Mr. Hiatt and Madam Howell wish it to be known that Mr. Froomkin most certainly does not work there, thank you very much. Why, the very thought!
May 2, 2008 at 9:39 am
Yeah, my jaw hit the floor w/ an audible thud when I read about the standing O.
What, one wonders, in one’s boundless naivete, would any of those standing clowns have replied, when asked why they were applauding? Seriously. “We were being polite”? “It was a party. Lighten up!”
Whatever it would be, THAT’s the locus of corruption in the journalistic mind.
“He nailed your head to the floor?”
“Yeh he did that. But he had to! I had transgressed the unwritten law.”
May 2, 2008 at 10:44 am
oooh… I wrote a complimentary note to Froomkin AND HE WROTE ME BACK!
He likes me, he likes me!
I haven’t worked up the nerve to ask him for a date yet though… I am sooo nervous… should I wait three days before writing back? I don’t want him to think I’m too eager…
May 2, 2008 at 3:18 pm
“Bloomberg, who happily posed for countless photos in a dress that exposed the preponderance of her two most outstanding achievements.”
I guess I haven’t seen Bloomberg in a while.
May 2, 2008 at 5:51 pm
r€nato don’t get you hopes up. I’ve found Froomkin to be a hopeless tease. Regardless, I still love the guy and am seriously considering stalking him. Shrill SO works for me.
May 2, 2008 at 9:27 pm
I read about the standing O.
Eeeewwww.
May 4, 2008 at 1:48 pm
How very shocking that a woman brought her tits with her to dinner. It’s a good thing teh menz left their penii at home.
May 4, 2008 at 2:01 pm
I read about the standing O.
I believe the British call it a “knee-trembler”.
May 4, 2008 at 5:07 pm
I read Dan Froomkin’s posting each weekday, so I had the Washington Post’s online opinion webpage bookmarked.
Last week I got a surprise. I clicked on my bookmark, called up the online opinion webpage like I’ve been doing for so long, expecting to see Dan Froomkin’s latest column title prominently displayed in the upper left, but instead found some pretty graphic to the left of column titles by Bob Novak and another right-wing spin merchant. Dan Froomkin wasn’t listed anywhere on the opinion page. So, I typed in Froomkin in the Search Box and was directed to the now “hidden” Dan Froomkin article.
Dan Froomkin is definitely one of the best journalists at the Washington Post, but apparently some right-wing (Fascist Republican) hack at the Washington Post is trying to marginalize him and his excellent investigative reporting.
May 5, 2008 at 4:01 am
This is the future America I get to hand my kids. Thank Poku for men like Froomkin or all hope would be lost.
May 5, 2008 at 8:13 am
aging professional floozy
Perfect.
May 6, 2008 at 1:59 pm
Froomkin has kept my belief in the WP alive for the past years – he’s done an incredible job of keeping the story straight when the rest of the press didn’t bother. (KnightRidder/McClatchy excepted.)