Well, somebody struck a nerve:
It’s worth noting that McCain’s point man in deflecting allegations that weren’t made is Bud Day, one of the original Swift Boat Veterans who smeared John Kerry. (More on Mr. Day and McCain here.) John Kerry was a decorated Vietnam War hero, and yet he was smeared continuously as a traitor by people like Bud Day, who now feign outrage and lie about Vietnam War hero Gen. Wesley Clark. Everybody tut-tuts that McCain is being “swiftboated”, everybody knows not to notice that McCain is in bed with the original swiftboaters, and has been for some time. He’s got such core principles, don’tcha know.
It’s also worth considering how McCain himself perceived these ridiculous attacks on John Kerry:
McCain said Kerry may have opened himself to criticism by focusing on Vietnam. In his own primary campaign in 2000, McCain said, he didn’t have to because everyone knew he’d been there. For Kerry, “it’s clearly a tactical or strategic move” to shield him against “charges of being too liberal and soft on defense.”
On the part of McCain and his defenders, then, we may safely conclude that constantly bringing up his POW experience is “a tactical or strategic move” to shield him against charges that he’s a crazy person who shouldn’t be allowed within 100 yards of the White House unless in Hannibal Lector-type full body restraints. Then, logically, we may conclude that any attacks on John McCain’s record as a POW, however regrettable, are merely the fruits of this tactic and/or strategy. Wesley Clark didn’t “swiftboat” McCain, and he never will. But somebody should. With that in mind, then, I present to you again:
And there’s much, much more where that came from. POW/MIA groups have held a grudge against McCain for decades, and, while some people (e.g., me) might think they are sad, damaged, delusional figures on the fringes of wingnuttery, that is no reason not to promote their claims. For if there is one thing I have learned over the last several years, it is that my personal views – and the views of tens of millions of Americans – are completely disgraceful and have no place in our political discourse. Alrighty, then. Secondly, I have learned from the internets that pointing out that someone is clearly several Spartans short of a phalanx is “ad hominem”*, which is … um, I think a Harry Potter spell intended to compel me to waste my time listening to pointless assholes. In any case, it’s Greek, or Latin, or some language spoken by those woof-woof butch progenitors of Western Civ that V.D. Hanson is always on about, so that means we have to do what it says or the terrorists have already won. Done, and done.
These objections dispensed with, then, we can get on with the ratfucking. If you have a friend, acquaintance, or family member who might be susceptible to this sort of shit – particularly if they have been bombarding you with mass emails about how Barack Obama is a secret Muslim, etc. – why not send them a link to the above video, and ask them why conservative boner idol (and bona fide war hero) Bob Dornan would say such things if they weren’t true. You could perhaps go on to mention the 32 anti-American propaganda tapes McCain made for the Communists (how does that qualify one to be President, I wonder?) some of the other issues real conservatives have raised about McCain’s dubious record in Vietnam, his San Francisco values, his atheism and hatred of traditional Christianity, his crazy temper, such grand unified theories of VC mind control as may suggest themselves, and other issues which might make the true conservative vote for crazy Bob Barr instead. If you don’t have an in like that, you could consider trolling right-wing message blogs and message boards and passing along this important information that the MSM won’t tell you. Outgoing people may brave talk radio call-in shows, even. Manchurian candidate references are encouraged, but no pressure. If you really can’t bring yourself down to this level, you might consider throwing a few dollars at the good, and legally sane, people from Vietnam Veterans Against John McCain. These are things you might do.
If one wishes to emulate people who have had success pushing their political agenda, these are some things you should do. You should encourage your opponents to emulate the Habits of Highly Impotent Political Movements – third party vanity candidates, purity tests, self-serving justifications for apathy, threats to move to Canada if your demands are not met, etc. We’ve all expressed our disappointment at Obama’s refusal to filibuster the FISA bill – he did the wrong thing there, unfortunately – but if you think this absolves you of responsibility for stopping McCain, and of the responsibility that you will incur by paying the bill for war with Iran and the rest of the Bush/McCain agenda, you are a hopeless, useless idiot. (Buh-buh some Democrats will vote for it too so I CAN NOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS FALLEN WORLD!!!) You are a grown up, you live in a democracy. Figure out how it works. Personally, I can’t take another four years of this horseshit. I can not take it. Enough of this shit already.
… A useful source of material.
* Not to be confused with ad homonym, which sounds the same, but means something different.
July 1, 2008 at 10:16 pm
For starters, you may wish to only refer to the presumptive Republican nominee for Prez as “Johnny Songbird.” That’s my plan, anyway. (”Sky Captain Andy Rooney” brings the funny, but doesn’t really get the job done. Let’s save that one for second and third tier blog comments.)
July 1, 2008 at 10:20 pm
Agreed. I think the winning epithet should be a clever variation on “Tokyo Rose”, a variation so clever and subtle I can’t figure out what it is.
July 1, 2008 at 11:22 pm
Danny the Capitulation Chipmunk AKA Myrtle Lipton.
Check please.
Also,
“Ratfuck”
You said the secret word! You said the secret word! Why don’t you go ahead and rip up that check.
July 1, 2008 at 11:38 pm
I don’t have any idiotic cousins or uncles to email, but I heard about a guy who was sending emails … no wait, let’s do this right …
From: XXX
To: XXX
Subject:
If you do not ever forward anything else, please forward this to all your contacts…this is very scary to think of what lies ahead of us here in our own
United States…better heed this and pray about it and share it.
July 1, 2008 at 11:42 pm
Anyone else notice that Gathering of Eagles ads quote H. Ross Perot? Now, these aren’t the most self-conscious individuals, but should we remind them what Mr. Perot thinks of Mr. McCain?
/end threadjack
July 1, 2008 at 11:51 pm
oops … anyway,
From: XXX
To: XXX
Subject: Dangerous Obama People!
If you do not ever forward anything else, please forward this to all your contacts … this is very scary to think of unprecedented danger. This happened to my own uncle Bill, a retired sergeant. He’d forwarded some IMPORTANT emails to me and my cousins about OBAMA and ISLAM and the FLAG. Somehow somebody traced the emails to him, because on his way from his own front door to his car in front of his he was ATTACKED by a bunch of openly Obama-supporting punks. One of them suckered punched him and before he knew what was happening he was on the ground being kicked! He has bruised ribs and black eyes.
After the last punch one of them shouted “Check SNOPES NEXT TIME” I don’t know what that means but I bet it’s not good. They know what you’re emailing so watch out!
IF YOU CARE ABOUT AMERICA forward this to everyone you know!
July 1, 2008 at 11:58 pm
did the outrageous display of san francisco values involve a large orange bridge? cause that’s pretty outrageous. who would paint a bridge orange?
July 2, 2008 at 12:42 am
Chris is winning.
July 2, 2008 at 12:52 am
IIRC, ratfucking often involves getting paid by a third “party” (hahaha) to undermine another party’s chances in an election. it is often internecine.
so, and to whit or wit, if i’m a gonna do this thing, WHO WILL RIGHT ME A FUCKING CHECK????
is it you mister fancy pants elitist-lover mr. editor? or should i call george soros?
seriously, i need a check and i’m happy to spend the next four months trolling redstate for cash.
July 2, 2008 at 4:48 am
while some people (e.g., me) might think they are sad, damaged, delusional figures on the fringes of wingnuttery, that is no reason not to promote their claims.
It would be irresponsible not to!
July 2, 2008 at 6:18 am
I still think “Oldy McOldman wants you off his lawn” is the unfair thing that will kill McCain, but it’s always good to keep up a steady rain of anything at all in hopes that something sticks.
July 2, 2008 at 6:24 am
Well, sheesh.
The rightnutosphere is having a bit of trouble getting up to speed on “Hanoi Johnny’s” troubled past and possible future, so it’s only fitting that we lend them a hand.
So what’s up with Johnny’s trip to Columbia?
Panama used to be part of Columbia, before the US fomented the rebellion that created Panama. Columbia still wants their “northern provinces” back, especially now that the US gave up the canal. And who is the most famous “Native” son who might be able to do that? Johnny needs cash, so it could be a win-win.
Or perhaps Hanoi Johnny was just meeting with his PRC handlers to get instructions for the next phase of his campaign? Hard to say, but it would be irresponsible not to try out trigger-words and -images to see if there’s some hidden conditioning waiting to pop out.
Yes, there could be a completely innocent explaination for the trip to Columbia: McCain was just picking up some “stuff” for his wife.
July 2, 2008 at 7:00 am
The McCain archetype in word and deed, “El Ultimo Presidente Arbusto Menos”, Bush the Lesser,
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/state.htm
incoming
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/bushgo.htm
outgoing
July 2, 2008 at 7:16 am
“I was a US airman engaged in crimes against the Vietnamese country and people.” Now THAT’s a qualification to fill George Bush’s shoes!
July 2, 2008 at 7:23 am
Who wrote Leonides a check? YOU ARE THE TIP OF THE SPEAR!!!
July 2, 2008 at 8:07 am
Agreed. I think the winning epithet should be a clever variation on “Tokyo Rose”, a variation so clever and subtle I can’t figure out what it is.
“Hanoi Johnny” is used above, but I think the correct version would be “Hanoi John.” It matches Hanoi Jane so closely that we can capitalise on the right’s seething hatred of Jane Fonda, for starters. Additionally, “Johnny” is too obviously snarky, while “John” keeps the slightest pretense of respect.
July 2, 2008 at 8:11 am
I still like “Johnny Songbird,” but “Hanoi John” cuts to the chase with less of that annoying nuance. Fuck Nuance! is pretty much the point.
July 2, 2008 at 8:15 am
* Not to be confused with ad homonym, which sounds the same, but means something different.
Wouldn’t that be an ad homophone attack?
July 2, 2008 at 8:18 am
At Digby’s place, dday points out the biggest chink in McBush’s armor:
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/wherein-i-borrow-armandos-speaking-for.html
Given that one of McCain’s biggest defenders here is Swift Boat Veterans for Truth star Bud Day, who was McCain’s DIVORCE LAWYER back in the day, there is more than a whiff of political opportunism here that’s prefectly visible to everyone.
Saint McSame is being defended by his DIVORCE LAWYER — think about it.
That would be the swift boating DIVORCE LAWYER that got his divorce from the faithful wife that stuck by him in captivity, so little Johnny could marry his BEER HEIRESS second wife.
Did I mention that John McCain is hiding behind his DIVORCE LAWYER?
July 2, 2008 at 11:13 am
As Joe COnason points out. we got two words for Hanoi John-Boy
“Admiral Stockton”
As in: ‘What part of: “Admiral Stockton was a well decorated and long term survivor in North Vietnamese POW prison”, AND “Admiral Stockton STILL was not V.P., let alone Presidential material” don’t you get’?
July 2, 2008 at 11:27 am
Stockdale that is.
July 2, 2008 at 11:42 am
Post title made me laugh.
July 2, 2008 at 12:14 pm
god, i love the Eds, but really??? any more of this capitulation and i’m done voting in general. if we can’t effect change that way (and it certainly looks like we can’t from, say, decades worth of evidence)… we have to look for other methods. electoral politics in America is a complete and utter waste of time and energy. we’re gonna get fucked by the corporate stooges either way.
July 2, 2008 at 12:59 pm
for you youngsters out there…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6n5OQVzVVQ&NR=1
Who am I? What am I doing here?
July 2, 2008 at 2:25 pm
Considering McCain’s “luck” in airplanes (3 pre-combat crashes, the U.S.S. Forrestal and getting shot down), it’s safe to say there would be no repeat of Bush’s “Mission Accomplished” stunt during a McCain presidency.
Q. Who would you rather see behind the controls of the airplane you’re traveling on?
a) John McCain
b) George W. Bush
c) The 15 year old son of an Aeroflot pilot
d) Ted Striker
July 2, 2008 at 6:22 pm
Ding! You’ve got Tard-Mail!
Is that the plan now?
Excellent.
July 2, 2008 at 7:10 pm
So who’s gonna dress up like the Queen of Hearts and follow Hanoi John everywhere he goes?
July 2, 2008 at 9:46 pm
Myrtle Lipton, google it.
July 3, 2008 at 8:31 am
[...] problem (and, previously, his broken wife problem) is none other than SBVFT Bud Day. That’s straight talk I can believe in! [...]
July 3, 2008 at 2:11 pm
Re: Stockdale
The “Who am I?” thing was always good for a laugh – until you realize that it was a rhetorical device, not an indication of being confused. Unlike Hanoi John (hey, what ABOUT that confession, Johnny?) now, Stockdale was not a doddering fool at the time. (Although I don’t know when his Alzheimer’s first hit.)
But you should give the guy a little more respect. And, no, I didn’t vote for Perot.
July 4, 2008 at 12:48 am
“ad hominem”*, which is … um, I think a Harry Potter spell intended to compel me to waste my time listening to pointless assholes.
That just makes my day.
July 4, 2008 at 1:06 am
But you should give the guy a little more respect. And, no, I didn’t vote for Perot.
Don’t throw anything at me, but the 18 year old me did just that. My politics have improved greatly during the intervening years.
Now I want Obama to choose a running mate with the temerity to turn his hearing aid off mid-debate. When Stockton did that he became a bit of a hero.
July 4, 2008 at 9:11 am
mdh:
Stockdale comment wasn’t directed at you, FYI.
Voting for Perot was not a sin (unless you’re a Rethug and believe the ‘thug BS about Clinton only won ’cause of Perot”). OTOH, voting for Nader is a clear sign that involuntary commitment is needed.
July 9, 2008 at 4:35 pm
[...] ratfucking: theory and method Posted by The Editors under Uncategorized Continuing on this theme [...]
July 14, 2008 at 11:32 am
Clinton did probably win because of Perot, at least the first time.
If you believe that the Perot voters, in a non-Perot world, wouldn’t have split at least 60-40 for Bush, I think you’re incorrect.
July 31, 2008 at 1:54 pm
[...] had better ideas, was more positive, etc., but still lost. As another like-minded blogger has pointed out, “These rats ain’t gonna fuck [...]
August 7, 2008 at 12:17 pm
[...] that special someone of a rat to fuck, and if you’ve already cruised all the pick-up spots tagged by Teh Editors to no avail, here’s the latest in rat-humping match.coms. Some mood music: [...]
August 26, 2008 at 7:16 am
[...] to remind them of this fact could make a difference come November. As the Editors is fond of saying, “These rats ain’t gonna fuck [...]
August 28, 2008 at 7:25 pm
[...] tentative rat foreplay, the counterfucking – the “ratcockblocking”, if you will – is done by eager volunteers. Nobody waits around for the McCain campaign to tell them what to do, and nobody writes out [...]
August 29, 2008 at 9:52 pm
[...] and games and amused detachment time is over. Time to so some ratfucking as if we were professional ratfuckers, just like [...]
September 23, 2008 at 7:33 pm
[...] this itself isn’t a proper ratfuck, as no one who reads the Nation was going to vote for McCain anyway. However, it might lend some [...]
October 20, 2008 at 3:48 am
The Right needs to understand: we have no reason to trust your judgment. You finally realize that “huge mistakes have been made,” although you don’t seem ready to admit that you are the ones who made them.
Starting From Zero
by Bruce Sharp
October 24, 2008 at 4:26 pm
[...] take back everything I ever said about ratfucking. It’s like bringing coal to Newcastle at this point, and cruel besides. I’ve joked [...]