<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Willies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thepoorman.net/2008/08/31/the-willies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thepoorman.net/2008/08/31/the-willies/</link>
	<description>leading the Democratic Lynch Mob since 2010</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:05:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rise of the Yahoos &#171; The Poor Man Institute</title>
		<link>http://thepoorman.net/2008/08/31/the-willies/#comment-12948</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rise of the Yahoos &#171; The Poor Man Institute]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 21:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepmi.wordpress.com/?p=610#comment-12948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] John McCain couldn&#8217;t pick Sarah Palin out of a lineup.  Then, he decided they were &#8220;soulmates&#8220;, and that - presumably owing to some hilarious generational confusion over current teen [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] John McCain couldn&#8217;t pick Sarah Palin out of a lineup.  Then, he decided they were &#8220;soulmates&#8220;, and that &#8211; presumably owing to some hilarious generational confusion over current teen [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://thepoorman.net/2008/08/31/the-willies/#comment-11426</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jennifer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 01:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepmi.wordpress.com/?p=610#comment-11426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re right; I don&#039;t care.

And &quot;amazed&quot; though you may be, I am not &quot;amazed&quot; that you&#039;re every bit as huge of a pompous asshole here as you were in the days when you commented at Eschaton.  

Again, if you don&#039;t like the definition, supply your own.  Otherwise, quit your bitching.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right; I don&#8217;t care.</p>
<p>And &#8220;amazed&#8221; though you may be, I am not &#8220;amazed&#8221; that you&#8217;re every bit as huge of a pompous asshole here as you were in the days when you commented at Eschaton.  </p>
<p>Again, if you don&#8217;t like the definition, supply your own.  Otherwise, quit your bitching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SFAW</title>
		<link>http://thepoorman.net/2008/08/31/the-willies/#comment-10949</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SFAW]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 05:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepmi.wordpress.com/?p=610#comment-10949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah, yes, the old &quot;When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean&quot; shtick. 

That has certainly worked well for Rethuglicans, but then I expect that from those amoral SOBs. I&#039;m just a little surprised (well, &quot;amazed&quot;, actually) to see it here. 

Not that you care, but you might want to cogitate (def. #2) on this: If popularity of an idea (or definition or what-have-you) equaled its truth, then Al Gore really &lt;i&gt;did&lt;/i&gt; invent the Internets.

Also, as an FYI:
&lt;b&gt;Cogitate:&lt;/b&gt;
verb
Origin: 1555–65; &lt; L cōgitātus (ptp. of cōgitāre)
1) To drink alcohol to excess
2) To adopt a &quot;thoughtful&quot; pose, in an attempt to fool another into believing you are actually thinking about what he/she just said.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, yes, the old &#8220;When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean&#8221; shtick. </p>
<p>That has certainly worked well for Rethuglicans, but then I expect that from those amoral SOBs. I&#8217;m just a little surprised (well, &#8220;amazed&#8221;, actually) to see it here. </p>
<p>Not that you care, but you might want to cogitate (def. #2) on this: If popularity of an idea (or definition or what-have-you) equaled its truth, then Al Gore really <i>did</i> invent the Internets.</p>
<p>Also, as an FYI:<br />
<b>Cogitate:</b><br />
verb<br />
Origin: 1555–65; &lt; L cōgitātus (ptp. of cōgitāre)<br />
1) To drink alcohol to excess<br />
2) To adopt a &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; pose, in an attempt to fool another into believing you are actually thinking about what he/she just said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://thepoorman.net/2008/08/31/the-willies/#comment-10871</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jennifer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 15:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepmi.wordpress.com/?p=610#comment-10871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SFAW - feel free to go over and submit your own definition for &quot;jonanism&quot; then, and let everyone weigh in on which one they prefer, if you find the &quot;half-witticism&quot; so objectionable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SFAW &#8211; feel free to go over and submit your own definition for &#8220;jonanism&#8221; then, and let everyone weigh in on which one they prefer, if you find the &#8220;half-witticism&#8221; so objectionable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SFAW</title>
		<link>http://thepoorman.net/2008/08/31/the-willies/#comment-10856</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SFAW]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepmi.wordpress.com/?p=610#comment-10856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jennifer -
Self-referential does not a definition make.

For example, I could have written &quot;A few bricks shy of a Pantload&quot; in the &quot;Vocabulary Corner&quot; string, but it wouldn&#039;t have been a definition, just a half-witticism.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jennifer -<br />
Self-referential does not a definition make.</p>
<p>For example, I could have written &#8220;A few bricks shy of a Pantload&#8221; in the &#8220;Vocabulary Corner&#8221; string, but it wouldn&#8217;t have been a definition, just a half-witticism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Major Woody</title>
		<link>http://thepoorman.net/2008/08/31/the-willies/#comment-10793</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Major Woody]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 03:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepmi.wordpress.com/?p=610#comment-10793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, at least we won&#039;t have to worry about McCain getting down with the interns. My friends.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, at least we won&#8217;t have to worry about McCain getting down with the interns. My friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whammer</title>
		<link>http://thepoorman.net/2008/08/31/the-willies/#comment-10764</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Whammer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 22:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepmi.wordpress.com/?p=610#comment-10764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know, that darned Willie just won&#039;t go home.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3XGjnQgsJA]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, that darned Willie just won&#8217;t go home.</p>
<p><span style="text-align:center; display: block;"><a href="http://thepoorman.net/2008/08/31/the-willies/"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/x3XGjnQgsJA/2.jpg" alt="" /></a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://thepoorman.net/2008/08/31/the-willies/#comment-10743</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jennifer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 16:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepmi.wordpress.com/?p=610#comment-10743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, SFAW, I went with the definition that was both more concise and more universal in application, which still covers all of the three definitions given by the Editors, since all three of the Editors&#039; definitions are covered under &quot;wankery&quot; or &quot;being a huge wanker&quot; or something of the type.  If there is a &quot;more correct&quot; definition for the word, we should probably ask calling all toasters, since it was of his invention.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, SFAW, I went with the definition that was both more concise and more universal in application, which still covers all of the three definitions given by the Editors, since all three of the Editors&#8217; definitions are covered under &#8220;wankery&#8221; or &#8220;being a huge wanker&#8221; or something of the type.  If there is a &#8220;more correct&#8221; definition for the word, we should probably ask calling all toasters, since it was of his invention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buskertype</title>
		<link>http://thepoorman.net/2008/08/31/the-willies/#comment-10740</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Buskertype]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepmi.wordpress.com/?p=610#comment-10740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Either that, or they catch him in the sack with Cindy.  rich people are like that, I tell ya.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Either that, or they catch him in the sack with Cindy.  rich people are like that, I tell ya.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buskertype</title>
		<link>http://thepoorman.net/2008/08/31/the-willies/#comment-10739</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Buskertype]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepmi.wordpress.com/?p=610#comment-10739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m with Dr.BDH.  I think this whole affair is going to come to an abrupt end when Todd &quot;sir dudealot&quot; Palin takes a swing at McCain.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Dr.BDH.  I think this whole affair is going to come to an abrupt end when Todd &#8220;sir dudealot&#8221; Palin takes a swing at McCain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

