I’ve said some harsh things about Hitchens over the years, but, in light of new evidence, I’m getting that dreadful feeling that I’ve been missing – shamefully, spectacularly – a very good joke. Consider, from this recent defense of John McCain’s innumerable houses:
I count myself as something of an expert on what writer Joyce Cary once called “tumbrel remarks.” A tumbrel remark is an unguarded comment by an uncontrollably rich person, of such crass insensitivity that it makes the workers and peasants think of lampposts and guillotines. I can give you a few for flavor. The late queen mother, being driven in a Rolls-Royce through a stricken district of Manchester, England, said as she winced at the view, “I see no point at all in being poor.”
Does anyone? Then, a few paragraphs later, in the authorial voice:
Every four years, we suddenly discover that the only people worth noticing or mentioning in the United States are those who are ill, or unemployed, or uninsured, or underpaid, or homeless, or some combination of the above. Bill and Hillary Clinton went on about these unprotected and wretched millions on two successive nights last week, apparently never reflecting that some of them at least must have been alive and suffering under the two Clinton administrations. How can a thinking person sit still and listen to such piffle, let alone get up and wave their arms about when they hear it again and again?
Hitchens can see no point at all in this “being poor” piffle. Or, I should say, “Hitchens” cannot. For, outside of a rather over-broad literary parody, who could possibly as un-self-aware as to write the preceeding lines? Could there possibly exist, in the daylight world, erstwhile champagne socialists so absurdly champagney that they bemoan the overexposure of the poor and working class in America, and castigate the hypocrisy of people who pretend they can number their properties without consulting the help? (And, really: how unspeakably vulgar it is when these arrivistes make a show of knowing how many houses they own. “Tiresome demagoguery,” is what our sort of people think.) But it’s just like I was saying to Dinesh D’Souza over double gin-n-gin’s (a delightful cocktail of my own invention) during our recent $5,000/night debate tour – everything in American politics is just class, class, class. I mean, it’s not like John McCain is actually the Queen Mum of the British Royal Family! He’s one of us, the real people in the world. So, we say enough! to your farcical lamppost-stringing and pantomime guillotine-erecting, you electoral Jacobins, you! John McCain would never suggest that the poor “eat cake.” Honorary prole that he is, he eats the cake hisself!
I get it now. Hitchens, and his literary creation “Hitchens”, are workers and works of the genius class. Now, please – watch this drive.

September 1, 2008 at 9:00 am
I have my file and am sharpening the blade on my guillotine as I write. It needs be extra sharp for a bourgeoisie parasite as dense as Hitchens.
September 1, 2008 at 9:51 am
You should see his last three for Vanity Fair – In Which I Use Male Grooming Products, They Should Keep Greenwich Village Like It Was When I Used to Drink There Because It Was Cheap, and ZOMG, When You Do It to a White Guy it’s Torture!
September 1, 2008 at 10:10 am
Hitch is following the trail blazed by Kingsley Amis. Except for the part with the good writing.
September 1, 2008 at 12:32 pm
cd @3,
actually, Hitchens writes quite well. Used to do so routinely, often still does.
Bad writing isn’t what makes Hitchens disgusting. After all, Céline was a good writer, too.
September 1, 2008 at 2:12 pm
“Every four years, we suddenly discover that the only people worth noticing or mentioning in the United States are those who are ill, or unemployed, or uninsured, or underpaid, or homeless, or some combination of the above. ”
Since that group probably only numbers, what, 3% of the American population at most, there’s no point at all in giving them so much mention.
September 1, 2008 at 3:20 pm
It needs be extra sharp for a bourgeoisie parasite as dense as Hitchens.
No Doc, extra dull. Too sharp and you might spare him the pain and suffering of repeated attempts.
September 1, 2008 at 3:23 pm
I thought the bourgeoisie were supposed to have jobs. Lingering around open-bar AEI functions is not gainful employment.
September 1, 2008 at 5:05 pm
Mrs. Tilton, you are likely right. It’s been awhile since I’ve read anything by him: His book on Orwell was the last thing I got through. I suppose the problem I had with it was less with the writing than its self-eulogizing, self referential voice, preparing us for Hitchens’ bold leap onto the world historical stage, where he would subsequently deploy his Orwellian sagacity to rip country pop acts.
Even the writers of his generation that I agree with politically seem to have a peculiar irksome quality. Maybe I’m just bored with them.
September 1, 2008 at 5:47 pm
So nice to hear from The Editors after all this time!
September 1, 2008 at 8:59 pm
I dunno. It’s possible that Hitchens is decrying the Clinton’s public lamentations about the poor not because he finds the poor distasteful, but because he finds the Clintons’ repeated bemoaning of their plight to be motivated by politics, rather than by a genuine concern for the poor.
If that’s what he’s saying, I’m not sure he’s right–but then, I’m not sure he’s wrong, either.
September 1, 2008 at 10:23 pm
Mr. Hitchens is in need of more waterboarding, to clear his brain of the Republican prions that are eating his higher mental processes.
,
September 1, 2008 at 10:50 pm
Céline was a complex guy and not actually a Nazi, nor even much of a sympathizer. Believe me, they would have executed him if he had been (look at Robert Brasillach). Obviously, those pamphlets he wrote were pretty inexcusable, but he had his good qualities, and he implicitly, at least, admitted that he’d done things he shouldn’t have. I think the fact that his years of internment almost certainly substantially shortened his life is punishment enough, if punishment was necessary.
Uh…what was I saying? Right: no fair lumping Céline in with a hack like Hitchens.
September 2, 2008 at 9:26 am
“Hitchens”. Heh, indeed. Now good day to you, and God Bless America.
September 2, 2008 at 10:35 pm
Don’t you mean “methode champenoise” socialists?