Well, it turns out that the Palin family has a long political association with America-hating fringe radicals. Why am I not surprised? And does anyone still wonder why so many real Americans hate Alaskans?
Here’s the dirty secret all of us know and no one will admit to. There are Alaskans, and then there are ICEHOLES. THAT’S RIGHT. I SAID IT. I said what everyone is thinking but is too scared to say out loud. In our world of strictly enforced PC orthodoxy, only Alaskans are allowed to pronounce the truth of it. Except that Alaskans as a community refuse to publicly denounce the Iceholes in their midst! And this is the single biggest obstacle to healing the interstate divide in this country.
Why won’t Alaskans, as a group, denounce these anti-American Iceholes? Is it because these purportedly “peaceful” Northerners secretly agree with the hateful program of this so-called “radical fringe”? We know that few Alaskans publicly support treasonous sucession, but how do we know what they say to each other, in their hockey rinks and igloos, when no one else can listen? Until all Alaskans forthrightly condemn Todd and Sarah Palin, and sign loyalty oaths, and allow the government to spy on them, without limits, at all times, Americans who love America will never accept them.
Perhaps, as Ben Smith claims, the traitorous Alaska Independence Party “isn’t all that fringy in Alaska.” But this just proves my point! When it comes to matters of patriotism, Alaskans are extreme outliers. Consider the responses to this simple question, weighting the Alaskan and American responses to these questions to reflect their proportions of the population:
| Alaska sucks polar bear nads |
Alaska’s OK |
|
| Alaskan yes |
0.0%
|
0.4%
|
| Real American yes |
56.5%
|
10.1%
|
| Total yes |
56.5%
|
10.5%
|
| Alaskan no |
0.4%
|
0.0%
|
| American no |
21.9%
|
72.5%
|
| Total no |
22.3%
|
72.5%
|
This means that a vast majority of Alaskans (100%) disagree with a solid majority of the overall population (60%) on the question of whether Alaska sucks polar bear nads, and a solid majority of Alaskans (100%) disagree with an overwhelming majority of the overall population (78%) on the question of whether Alaska’s OK. The mathematical truth about interstate relations that this reveals, then, is that Alaskans are extreme political outliers. And who cares what extremists think? Especially when their mouths are probably full of polar bear nads or whatever.
Anyone who disagrees with me is more concerned about fuzzy-headed rhetoric about “tolerance” and “diversity” than they are about protecting America, and could well mount a frosty fifth column during the coming War on Iceholes, and no doubt try to weaken our national resolve during the critically important invasion and open-ended occupation of Antarctica. To victory!
September 2, 2008 at 7:21 pm
What’s that old joke? The one whose punchline is “kick ‘em in the icehole.”
September 2, 2008 at 7:29 pm
Timely question, Peorgie
It’s how you catch a polar bear (!)
You put a bunch of peas around a hole that you cut in the ice.
When he comes over to take pea, you kick him in the icehole.
September 2, 2008 at 7:40 pm
Ammo: http://www.politico.com/static/PPM41_palin.html
September 2, 2008 at 7:43 pm
Politico is playing games with this 63 page research document on Palin, this link is better.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0908/13084.html
September 2, 2008 at 7:46 pm
Thank you, Jas. You must be as old as I am.
September 2, 2008 at 8:00 pm
The National Enquirer is the voice of the Angry Left(TM).
WHy didn’t I get that memo?
September 2, 2008 at 8:02 pm
So’s US Weekly.
Elitists.
September 2, 2008 at 8:19 pm
The really great thing here is that McCain has practically no recourse. I think my favorite of the myriad mini-scandals appearing here is the one about Johnny-boy trying to obstruct the release of the investigation into the trooper firing before the election.
September 2, 2008 at 8:45 pm
Pssst…there’s no such word as “Proportedly”.
September 2, 2008 at 8:48 pm
Not in English, maybe.
September 2, 2008 at 8:53 pm
The sugar is back up online.
http://www.politico.com/static/PPM106_palin_doc.html
September 3, 2008 at 3:26 am
FARGING ICEHOLES! I CRUSH YOUR BELLS IN A VICE!
September 3, 2008 at 8:05 am
Why not? There’s “antiportedly,” isn’t there? This is the opposite–which you’d know if you did more opposition research.
September 3, 2008 at 10:44 am
They hate us for our seasons.
September 4, 2008 at 1:01 pm
IS THIS ELECTION ABOUT JUDGMENT?
Sarah Pahin uses poor judgment and the GOP makes her out to be a hero!
The issue should not be about Sarah Pahin not having an abortion. The issue is that she did not have the good judgment to use birth control. Any intelligent person knows that when you choose to have unprotected sex at 43 you have a very high probability of having a child with Downs Syndrome. The republicans are making her out to be a hero because she used the bad judgment not to prevent the pregnancy in the first place.
September 4, 2008 at 1:03 pm
The People That John McCain Owes Alegence To.
Is John McCain in the pocket of insurance companies?
Is john McCain in the pocket of pharmaceutical companies?
Is McCain in the pocket of the mortgage companies?
Is McCain in the pocket of the banking industry?
Is John McCain in the pocket of oil companies?
Here is a list of lobbyists and employees of major companies working in major positions in the McCain campaign.
It will answer any questions you might have about the people who are advising and influencing him.
http://mccainsource.com/corruption?id=0006
September 5, 2008 at 7:53 pm
Will someone please tell Sarah Palin that:
JESUS WAS A COMMUNITY ORGANIZER