I wonder how that GOP minority outreach thingy is going. What, with MC Macaca bustin routines and rhymes all night, I’m sure the voter registration drive is hotting up. In the interest of offering the GOP a bit of friendly advice, however, may I suggest setting up some booths in Harlem and distributing a condensed version of the following in flier form:
National Review‘s Mark Krikorian notes that (1) Washington Mutual became the largest bank to fail in American history yesterday and (2) its last press release touted the fact that it was named one of America’s most diverse employers, having been “honored specifically for its efforts to recruit Hispanic employees, reach out to Hispanic consumers and support Hispanic communities and organizations”; for being “named [one of] the top 60 companies for Hispanics”; for “attaining equal rights for GLBT employees and consumers”; for having “earned points for competitive diversity policies and programs, including the recently established Latino, African American and GLBT employee network groups”; and for being “named one of 25 Noteworthy Companies by Diversity Inc magazine and one of the Top 50 Corporations for Supplier Diversity by Hispanic Enterprise magazine.”
While juxtaposing these two facts — (1) WaMu has a racially and ethnically diverse workforce and (2) WaMu collapsed yesterday — the National Review writer headlined his post: “Cause and Effect?” He apparently believes that the reason Washington Mutual failed may be because it employed and was too accommodating to large numbers of Hispanics, African-Americans and gays. Is that why Lehman Brothers, AIG, Bear Sterns and so many others also failed — too racially diverse of a workforce?
What I’d pay for a front row seat on 125th Street. Jonah, perhaps you could lend a hand as well? I’m sure you could get some plucky young intern to put together a pamphlet containing the key points of your ”There Was No Racism in America as of 1968” thesis.
But seriously, why do minorities vote for Democrats? They so crazy…
September 26, 2008 at 11:55 am
Is it just me or is the National Review and its ilk getting ever more open about its racism? I mean, I don’t think they could have written this 4 or 8 years ago…
September 26, 2008 at 12:56 pm
Sorry this is off topic, but isn’t anyone here going to comment on the political trap that the Democrats are busy falling into, voting for the hugely unpopular “Bush-Pelosi-Reid-Obama” bailout plan that McCain and other “principled Republicans” are readying to vote NO on?
September 26, 2008 at 1:26 pm
Is it just me or is the National Review and its ilk getting ever more open about its racism? I mean, I don’t think they could have written this 4 or 8 years ago…
I kind of agree, but then, they wrote much worse back in the 1960s when they were defending segregation and wrining their hands about trouble makers like Martin Luther King.
Guess overt racism is back in style.
September 26, 2008 at 1:27 pm
…isn’t anyone here going to comment on the political trap that the Democrats are busy falling into, voting for the hugely unpopular “Bush-Pelosi-Reid-Obama” bailout plan that McCain and other “principled Republicans” are readying to vote NO on?
Speaking only for myself, I think it will be a mistake unless the Dems get basically everything they want in the bill. If they do, they should get it done. I don’t think McCain looks big by flailing about incomprehensively.
As for writing about it, others have been doing a much better job than I could. I’m not even crazy about my thoughts as expressed in this comment.
September 26, 2008 at 1:44 pm
WaMu’s clearly stated business plan was to make bad loans. They targeted sub-prime lending all over the country, especially in Florida and California. Home prices were rising, so it worked for while. The OTS is a notoriously lax regulator, always has been. Those minorities taking applications were following the underwriting guidelines set by management. Kirkorian is an ignorant bigot.
September 26, 2008 at 2:04 pm
No. They are getting openly more crazy about everything. The racism just sticks out more.
September 26, 2008 at 2:54 pm
isn’t anyone here going to comment on the political trap that the Democrats are busy falling into, voting for the hugely unpopular “Bush-Pelosi-Reid-Obama” bailout plan that McCain and other “principled Republicans” are readying to vote NO on?
Well, given that Pelosi and Reid have made it clear they agree with you, I wouldn’t say the subject is being exactly ignored.
The question is, which is worse: To pass a bill with no Republican votes and let the Rs then run against the Bush-Pelosi-Reid bailout? Or, by insisting on Republican vote, give the Rs leverage to block anything good that might otherwise be included?
Inviolation of the Code of Blog Commenters, I admit I’m not sure what he answer is.