<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mysteries of the wingnut mind</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thepoorman.net/2008/09/30/mysteries-of-the-wingnut-mind/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thepoorman.net/2008/09/30/mysteries-of-the-wingnut-mind/</link>
	<description>leading the Democratic Lynch Mob since 2010</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:05:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: All Your Electroral Votes Are Belong To Us &#171; THE TOOT</title>
		<link>http://thepoorman.net/2008/09/30/mysteries-of-the-wingnut-mind/#comment-13888</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[All Your Electroral Votes Are Belong To Us &#171; THE TOOT]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 17:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepmi.wordpress.com/?p=874#comment-13888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] a vibrant new electoral coalition in time for 2012.  Time Cube Guy, Chuck Norris, Pedobear and the conFURvatives will form the new &#8220;base&#8221;.  Around them we could collect Tron Guy (transhumans), Peter [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a vibrant new electoral coalition in time for 2012.  Time Cube Guy, Chuck Norris, Pedobear and the conFURvatives will form the new &#8220;base&#8221;.  Around them we could collect Tron Guy (transhumans), Peter [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jubal8</title>
		<link>http://thepoorman.net/2008/09/30/mysteries-of-the-wingnut-mind/#comment-12647</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jubal8]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 09:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepmi.wordpress.com/?p=874#comment-12647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmmm... perhaps I subconsciously misinfurred my meaning, resulting in further entanglements between my Big Bangs and famous furbies like Minkowski and Levi-Civeta. Think I&#039;ll hop into my deLorentz and get the flux outta here before somebody puts a cap in my acitor.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230; perhaps I subconsciously misinfurred my meaning, resulting in further entanglements between my Big Bangs and famous furbies like Minkowski and Levi-Civeta. Think I&#8217;ll hop into my deLorentz and get the flux outta here before somebody puts a cap in my acitor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: secondharmonic</title>
		<link>http://thepoorman.net/2008/09/30/mysteries-of-the-wingnut-mind/#comment-12622</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[secondharmonic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepmi.wordpress.com/?p=874#comment-12622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That would be the mass of everything that is, I guess.
Hard to see exactly what the normalization conditions are there, since we can&#039;t take a box out to large values of length, then, can we?
Yet the mass of the whole universe makes some sense to some physicists. I dunno. I don&#039;t go in for that stuff. {as also in: dontcha need an observer somewhere? and just where is he supposed to be standing, or sitting? maybe in &quot;de Sitter space&quot;? -- a little joke there}.
  And what with the cosmological constant and all, I am none too sure it makes sense even to them, any more.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would be the mass of everything that is, I guess.<br />
Hard to see exactly what the normalization conditions are there, since we can&#8217;t take a box out to large values of length, then, can we?<br />
Yet the mass of the whole universe makes some sense to some physicists. I dunno. I don&#8217;t go in for that stuff. {as also in: dontcha need an observer somewhere? and just where is he supposed to be standing, or sitting? maybe in &#8220;de Sitter space&#8221;? &#8212; a little joke there}.<br />
  And what with the cosmological constant and all, I am none too sure it makes sense even to them, any more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jubal8</title>
		<link>http://thepoorman.net/2008/09/30/mysteries-of-the-wingnut-mind/#comment-12614</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jubal8]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 17:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepmi.wordpress.com/?p=874#comment-12614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So is this E in the equation the exact same thing as what was present in the yocto-instant after the BB, before the emergence of the QGP out of the... uhhh... E?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So is this E in the equation the exact same thing as what was present in the yocto-instant after the BB, before the emergence of the QGP out of the&#8230; uhhh&#8230; E?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: secondharmonic</title>
		<link>http://thepoorman.net/2008/09/30/mysteries-of-the-wingnut-mind/#comment-12605</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[secondharmonic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 13:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepmi.wordpress.com/?p=874#comment-12605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[good point jubal8. Since SR is closely tied with Maxwell, and indeed is incorporated into QED, it is tempting to say &#039;electromagnetic&#039;. But since &#039;mass&#039; is mostly conferred by the Higgs interaction, maybe not. Yet, if they are all unified, then what difference does it make. Indeed, when you collide two electrons at relativistic speeds, you get a whole slew of particles, in various flavors, with cross sections for their production often closely predicted (or at least consistently predicted -- i.e. some constants are variables in one experiment, but the same values you arrive at in the first experiment work to predict the results of different experiments) by the Standard Model.

In other news, I congratulate the Editors &lt;i&gt;fur&lt;/i&gt; having found the &lt;i&gt;fur&lt;/i&gt;tive hideout of the legendary, often busted, often re&lt;i&gt;fur&lt;/i&gt;bished and regenerated gang of degenerates that is the FFF (FurFuxFrenz; Why, that could even be the domain of the Majestic Golden Porn Dragon of the East and South!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good point jubal8. Since SR is closely tied with Maxwell, and indeed is incorporated into QED, it is tempting to say &#8216;electromagnetic&#8217;. But since &#8216;mass&#8217; is mostly conferred by the Higgs interaction, maybe not. Yet, if they are all unified, then what difference does it make. Indeed, when you collide two electrons at relativistic speeds, you get a whole slew of particles, in various flavors, with cross sections for their production often closely predicted (or at least consistently predicted &#8212; i.e. some constants are variables in one experiment, but the same values you arrive at in the first experiment work to predict the results of different experiments) by the Standard Model.</p>
<p>In other news, I congratulate the Editors <i>fur</i> having found the <i>fur</i>tive hideout of the legendary, often busted, often re<i>fur</i>bished and regenerated gang of degenerates that is the FFF (FurFuxFrenz; Why, that could even be the domain of the Majestic Golden Porn Dragon of the East and South!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Comclop</title>
		<link>http://thepoorman.net/2008/09/30/mysteries-of-the-wingnut-mind/#comment-12600</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. Comclop]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 08:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepmi.wordpress.com/?p=874#comment-12600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The techno industrial eurotrash may scoff at their baby black hole before it retreats to the center of the earth.  

But the apocalypse to come will vindicate my faith!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The techno industrial eurotrash may scoff at their baby black hole before it retreats to the center of the earth.  </p>
<p>But the apocalypse to come will vindicate my faith!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jubal8</title>
		<link>http://thepoorman.net/2008/09/30/mysteries-of-the-wingnut-mind/#comment-12589</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jubal8]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 21:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepmi.wordpress.com/?p=874#comment-12589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, color me one of those Joe Sixpack Einstein wannabeers who wants to go from 2+2=4 to E=MC2 while still using my fingers -- for what, I won&#039;t say -- but anyway, if that pencil could be converted to pure energy, what kind of energy would it be? Electromagnetic? Some kind of strong or weak nuclear force? Would it be like light and exist as both particles and waves, or like Schroedinger&#039;s cat and not decide what it is until we observe it in the split-second before we are plasmafied? How would it act upon conversion? Expand in all directions simultaneously, all being 3, 4, 11 or n dimensions? Answer me that, hunh?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, color me one of those Joe Sixpack Einstein wannabeers who wants to go from 2+2=4 to E=MC2 while still using my fingers &#8212; for what, I won&#8217;t say &#8212; but anyway, if that pencil could be converted to pure energy, what kind of energy would it be? Electromagnetic? Some kind of strong or weak nuclear force? Would it be like light and exist as both particles and waves, or like Schroedinger&#8217;s cat and not decide what it is until we observe it in the split-second before we are plasmafied? How would it act upon conversion? Expand in all directions simultaneously, all being 3, 4, 11 or n dimensions? Answer me that, hunh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: secondharmonic</title>
		<link>http://thepoorman.net/2008/09/30/mysteries-of-the-wingnut-mind/#comment-12571</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[secondharmonic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepmi.wordpress.com/?p=874#comment-12571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yeah that&#039;s the &#039;time&#039; formula - how long it takes you as measured by you in &#039;light units&#039; to get &#039;there&#039;. If you are light, it takes no &#039;time&#039; at all. Negative values are presumably (timelike) that you could have got there by now, or you will get there just by waiting a second, and positive values meaning you would never have got there by &#039;now&#039; (spacelike).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah that&#8217;s the &#8216;time&#8217; formula &#8211; how long it takes you as measured by you in &#8216;light units&#8217; to get &#8216;there&#8217;. If you are light, it takes no &#8216;time&#8217; at all. Negative values are presumably (timelike) that you could have got there by now, or you will get there just by waiting a second, and positive values meaning you would never have got there by &#8216;now&#8217; (spacelike).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kenmeer livermaile</title>
		<link>http://thepoorman.net/2008/09/30/mysteries-of-the-wingnut-mind/#comment-12570</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kenmeer livermaile]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepmi.wordpress.com/?p=874#comment-12570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;This has always freaked me out because it means that light travels 0 distance in spacetime no matter how far it goes in our perpective.&quot;

Cool, eh? In disproving the existence of a background cosmic aether, Einstein providing something even better: a cosmic aether that travels so ultimately, definitively, and commandingly fast that it stays still even as it moves faster than anything can.

Heil light!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This has always freaked me out because it means that light travels 0 distance in spacetime no matter how far it goes in our perpective.&#8221;</p>
<p>Cool, eh? In disproving the existence of a background cosmic aether, Einstein providing something even better: a cosmic aether that travels so ultimately, definitively, and commandingly fast that it stays still even as it moves faster than anything can.</p>
<p>Heil light!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kenmeer livermaile</title>
		<link>http://thepoorman.net/2008/09/30/mysteries-of-the-wingnut-mind/#comment-12569</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kenmeer livermaile]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepmi.wordpress.com/?p=874#comment-12569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;*sigh*

E=Mc**2

You can convert the mass of the pencil to a shitload of energy.

You cannot accelerate the pencil to the speed of light with that shitload of energy.&quot;

*sigh* We&#039;ve already been through several of these sighs, begininning with mine in my first post:

&#039;Yes, I know it’s impossible to travel faster than the speed of light, or even to accelerate a pencil to the speed of light.

&#039;But that IS what the equation says, period. It IS a linear equation, yes?&#039;

I&#039;m feeling an itch for some healing internet incivility.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;*sigh*</p>
<p>E=Mc**2</p>
<p>You can convert the mass of the pencil to a shitload of energy.</p>
<p>You cannot accelerate the pencil to the speed of light with that shitload of energy.&#8221;</p>
<p>*sigh* We&#8217;ve already been through several of these sighs, begininning with mine in my first post:</p>
<p>&#8216;Yes, I know it’s impossible to travel faster than the speed of light, or even to accelerate a pencil to the speed of light.</p>
<p>&#8216;But that IS what the equation says, period. It IS a linear equation, yes?&#8217;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m feeling an itch for some healing internet incivility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

