Ah, to be 72 and in love! Ten weeks ago, John McCain couldn’t pick Sarah Palin out of a lineup. Then, he decided they were “soulmates“, and that – presumably owing to some hilarious generational confusion over current teen lingo – his expressed desire to “tap” her resulted in the stupidest, funnest VP pick ever. And now, one abuse of power finding and several dozen approval points ago, it would appear that the romance is over:
With his electoral prospects fading by the day, Senator John McCain has fallen out with his vice-presidential running mate about the direction of his White House campaign.
McCain has become alarmed about the fury unleashed by Sarah Palin, the moose-hunting “pitbull in lipstick”, against Senator Barack Obama. Cries of “terrorist” and “kill him” have accompanied the tirades by the governor of Alaska against the Democratic nominee at Republican rallies.
Mark Salter, McCain’s long-serving chief of staff, is understood to have told campaign insiders that he would prefer his boss, a former Vietnam prisoner of war, to suffer an “honourable defeat” rather than conduct a campaign that would be out of character – and likely to lose him the election.
Of course, The Callow Reader thinks, were any of this true, McCain could shitcan her, problem solved. However, Callow Reader, if there is one thing that I have learned over the past eight years, it is that correcting your stupid mistakes is reckless, does not demonstrate strong, steady leadership, and would embolden the terrorists and cause more hurricanes or some shit. Instead, he should pretend to suspend his campaign, threaten war with a nuclear superpower for no particular reason, commit to 10,000 years of war in Iraq, and contradict himself a few hundred more times on the economy. Because VP picks, unlike marriage vows, are sacred and unbreakable. Or whatever.
McCain’s problem here is that he can’t win. Not because he’s a bad person or a bad campaigner – although he is – but because he decided to hook his wagon to that vigorous political stallion Dubya back in 2002 on the assumption that his approval ratings would soon top 36,000%, and, now that the President seems uninterested in getting up before 2PM or changing out of his pajamas, that is not looking like a smart bet. He’s not without fault here – there were ample opportunities to break up with the Boy King when it might have mattered, and even some timid half-steps in that direction when it didn’t – but, unfortunately, making those sorts of choices requires judgment and political courage, and those aren’t John McCain’s strong suits. Ambition, and a consuming lust for the ambitious, are – hence the embrace of Dubya. Hence the soulful tapping of Sarah Palin.
Ah, Sarah! Like crack for crackers! It’s the kind of feeling that only Yacht Rock can truly express:
Among the many spiteful joys of the Palin nomination is that it has confirmed what I have long suspected about people who listen to Hall & Oates. And it has hopefully exploded the central myth of American politics: that the modern Republican party is an equal union between white evangelicals and libertarian business types. Democrats, believing this model, have long tried to drive a wedge into this mythical divide, hoping to embarrass the business class with the anti-evolution nonsense or frighten the religious populists with the results of global warming denial. It made a certain sense – it’s the proles and the bourgies, an unnatural union, and all you have to do is explain to one or the other that they are voting against their own self-interest and it should split along natural fissures like all good class conflicts should. It never worked, because the model is wrong. The Republican coalition is not like that. It is, in fact, a big lump of yahooism with a decorative garnish of David Brooks. John McCain was a great favorite of PBS Republicans, which, along with $5.50, will get you a Happy Meal, but won’t excite the base a bit. The Palin pick has stripped away the “intellectual elites” – the beards for the base – and left the lumpenproletariat exposed, though not much smaller than it was for Bush, when you adjust for the utter failure of everything he has touched and the fact that the economy is fuckin’ fucked and we will all be bartering with human skulls by Thanksgiving. So, then, a teaching moment, and let us try to remember this for a few election cycles, or at least a few missing white women: Republicans are yahoo assholes. Tell yer friends.
October 12, 2008 at 4:05 pm
Well if the libertarian business types don’t like the Republican Party anymore, they’re more than welcome to stop donating to the yahoos and donate instead to Democratic candidates for office. Or me. Have your people call my people. Let’s talk.
October 12, 2008 at 4:18 pm
Libertarians are like furries: the internet’s full of ‘em, but they are not a significant political constituency. Or else libertarians dress up like the Shirt Tales and gangbang each other. I forget. In any case, when you start taking them seriously, it’s time to stop posting for a week.
See you in a week.
October 12, 2008 at 4:39 pm
Goddam that wasted some of my time on teh Earth.
Shorter The Editors:
“Republicans are yahoo assholes. Tell yer friends.”
Give us some kittens or that cartoon shit, whatever, jeebus, fukkers, get to the goddamed point!
October 12, 2008 at 4:39 pm
Marry me. Do it right now.
A.
October 12, 2008 at 4:40 pm
I’ve always wondered how Republicans reconciled their other contradictions, such as the insistence that they believe in “small-government” with their flag-waving support for unregulated-government-surveillance-of-everything.
But this explains that too.
October 12, 2008 at 4:41 pm
Oh, and “crack for crackers”. heh indeed.
October 12, 2008 at 4:42 pm
PS
I hate “libertarians”, too. As some wise man said, libertarians are Republicans who smoke pot.
October 12, 2008 at 5:08 pm
I can’t tell if the Republicans are maybe playing the long game: Whoever wins this election is inheriting a world of shit, and is going to start and finish out the next four years bearing the burden, and taking blame, for much of that shit. Is the GOP maybe deliberately throwing this one so they can step in four years later to “clean up the mess?”
And yet if they win, they’ve done so by whipping up even more wingnut polarization to do so.
See what I mean? If they win, they win. If they lose, they still win.
October 12, 2008 at 5:11 pm
“libertarians” are Glenn Reynolds and/or Megan McArdle types–lllaaaaaammmmmmmmeeeee.
October 12, 2008 at 5:26 pm
So Rich Lowery was pulling his lever for Sarah?
October 12, 2008 at 5:28 pm
Oh, BTW, hot tip for the new economy: Lentils.
October 12, 2008 at 5:46 pm
bunny
Yeah – that was Hoover’s plan in 1932 as well.
The Republicans will run on this theme, but in about forty years, not four, when they can at last run a generation of candidates who have never ever hugged, campaigned with, shaken hands with, or stood next to George W. Bush.
October 12, 2008 at 5:59 pm
It does smell of ‘96 a little. And you have to leave someone out of the loop, to achieve the ever popular Plausible Deniability. Hence, her.
BTW: Remember Human Shields?
Apparently children are fair game:
“Perhaps it was Palin’s youngest daughter, Piper, who emerged with her in a Flyers jersey, which helped mollify the crowd. The Alaska governor had even foreshadowed the tactic earlier in the day.”
“’I’ve been warned that Flyers fans, they get so enthused, that they boo everybody at the drop of the puck,” she said at a Philadelphia fundraiser Saturday afternoon. “But what I thought I’d do is I’d put Piper in a Flyers jersey, bring her out with me. How dare they boo Piper!’”
Yeah, lady. The town that made Dave Schultz a folk hero hates your kid.
October 12, 2008 at 6:06 pm
[...] palin. Under The blogosphere By JasonC the editors: McCain’s problem here is that he can’t win. Not because he’s a bad person or a bad campaigner [...]
October 12, 2008 at 6:09 pm
I *need* somebody to tell me that the “Sarah Smile” video was meant ironically.
But I clicked on the link and I’m afraid it isn’t so.
Somebody hold me.
October 12, 2008 at 6:20 pm
Happy meals are $5.50 now? Quick, someone tell the proles that the business class is screwing them.
October 12, 2008 at 6:34 pm
It took about halfway through that video for me to realize it was meant to be a PRO-Palin thing. I guess my mind just did not want to accept the horrifying possibility that such a thing could be meant in earnest.
October 12, 2008 at 7:03 pm
“The Republicans will run on this theme, but in about forty years, not four, when they can at last run a generation of candidates who have never ever hugged, campaigned with, shaken hands with, or stood next to George W. Bush.”
Fellatio, then, is acceptable?
October 12, 2008 at 7:06 pm
“It took about halfway through that video for me to realize it was meant to be a PRO-Palin thing. I guess my mind just did not want to accept the horrifying possibility that such a thing could be meant in earnest.”
Worse, I’m positive the singer is one of The Commodores. Hired, I suppose, to give white bigot dodoheads that good old Big 80s feel again.
Ah, the 80s, when for awhile there they could believe that the King of Pop was trying to turn himself into a white man.
Instead of a tan woman-thing.
Annie iz y’o-KAY?
October 12, 2008 at 7:38 pm
What? You mean they meant “pull the lever for Sarah” literally? Holy shit.
October 12, 2008 at 8:11 pm
So are you saying that the Republican base is base?
October 12, 2008 at 11:53 pm
What’s the use of human skulls, and why would anyone barter for them?
October 13, 2008 at 12:13 am
“I hate “libertarians”, too. As some wise man said, libertarians are Republicans who smoke pot.”
Smoke pot and, i would add, have sex with liberal women.
October 13, 2008 at 12:17 am
Or rather, TRY to have sex with liberal women.
October 13, 2008 at 4:23 am
However, Callow Reader, if there is one thing that I have learned over the past eight years, it is that correcting your stupid mistakes is reckless
Aren’t you rather harsh on Callow Reader?
October 13, 2008 at 5:57 am
“I knew Callow Reader, Callow Reader was a friend of mine, and you, Senator, are no Callow Reader!”
October 13, 2008 at 6:13 am
Surely you jest.
October 13, 2008 at 8:14 am
See what I mean? If they win, they win. If they lose, they still win.
i been sayin’ dat f’r over a year now…
the way i see it is: 1) the pukes throw this election to the Dims so that they inherit and have the joyless, luckless, hopeless task of appearing to repair the last 30 yearws of GOP fuck-ups, paving the way for the return to the Rightards in ‘12…
or…2) the bosses, finally recognizing the imminence of total collapse of the all the worlds’ systems, seeing this as the last chance to steal everything, install McC(umst)ain and just proceed with the looting unimpeded…
Either way, Obama and the Dims are fucked… and, sadly, with them us…
October 13, 2008 at 8:21 am
Libertarians are nerds who want the benefit of feeling intellectually superior without having any of their theories actually tested in the real world. Pot is optional; guns and Warhammer are required.
October 13, 2008 at 8:28 am
No thanks, I’m happy to have the deregulation / anti-government libertarians go down with the Republican ship. Don’t want ‘em. No thanks.
October 13, 2008 at 8:44 am
Funny how the one group who always, always, always think “This is excellent news .. for Republicans!” is libruls like Woody. It’s like they can’t handle the thought of not losing.
October 13, 2008 at 8:55 am
Just a thought, but I read about a rumor yesterday that could very well be a major gamechanger for McCain. Seems that someone high up in the CA republician party said that serious discussions were ongoing about replacing Palin with Romney with the announcement to be made during Wed. dabate. With Palin totally out of the loop I think that this might just be possible. Sure it would piss off the rabid right red meat rethugs, but who else they gonna vote for? Besides it would have the extra added attraction of turning the entire campaign around. Reason to get rid of Palin. To divisive.An oldie but a goodie”I want to spend more time with my family Or even better, “because of the total global meltdown Sarah Palin has volunteered to step aside for the good of the country so that a proven person who really knows the economy can take her place.”
Now, if he did this, and got rid of the rove disciples, I think that he could totally dominate the entire news cycle for over a week and could in fact bring his campaign up to if not pass that of Obama. What say you?
October 13, 2008 at 9:40 am
It occurred to me at four this morning in a sweaty fit of insomnia that McCain has no more say in the GOP choice for Veep than does Mayor McCheese. The game is played behind the curtain, folks (that’s where the levers are, anyway), and the Republican Party would nominate Lyndon LaRouche if they thought he could deliver the 50%+1 necessary to hang onto those levers. McCain has been and continues to be a stooge — almost to the same extent as Mooselini herself.
October 13, 2008 at 9:52 am
Replacing Palin and Romney would not be as funny as choosing Palin over Romney. Nor as stupid. So it McCain’t be.
Callow readers everywhere agree with me.
October 13, 2008 at 9:56 am
I just put on my “Order of the Shrill” Tshirt in honor of he who won the Nobel in Economics.
I should have said this years ago, Thanks for the T.
October 13, 2008 at 10:01 am
Two distinct and separate voting blocks that wanted small government have supported the Republican Party in recent years. The first is corporate American. Big business has benefited greatly from the hands off policies of the Bush administration. It contributed heavily to his election and in exchange it has received more than its money’s worth, in lower taxes, lax over site of environmental, public health and labor law. Not to mention the turning of a blind eye to criminal conduct involving national and international law.
The other block is the Yahoos. These are the gun loving, my country can do no wrong, love or leave it, no taxes, don’t tread on me right wingers that want to be left alone to do their own thing whether it’s having multiple wives, set up their own colonies of like minded Yahoos in Idaho or Utah, or just rant about how “the gover’ment is bunch of crooked commie pinko socialists.” What did they get? Just the opposite, higher taxes, unprecedented government intrusion into their personal lives, a crumbling national infrastructure, sky high fuel prices, a $10 billion and still rising National debt and 5 years of unending war
With the economy now in shambles corporate American seems more than ready to embrace the despised Socialism that they so fervently railed against for so long. So with big business begging for nationalization of the banking and credit industries the Yahoo base is about all that’s left, and the only way they are going to be prevented from abandoning the party is for Palin to try to keep them so whipped up that they don’t notice that they’ve been used. That they along with all the rest of us, are now left standing in ruins created by the very type of gover’ment that they wanted, and that Bush and the Republicans have supplied for the last 8 years!
October 13, 2008 at 10:40 am
Replacing Palin with Romney would reek of desperation. It would fit into Obama’s narrative that McCain is impulsive and erratic. The media would boo it, the “base” would shriek bloody murder, no one would be happy about it. It would be an Obama landslide.
So yeah, bring it on.
October 13, 2008 at 10:44 am
“Seems that someone high up in the CA republician party said that serious discussions were ongoing about replacing Palin with Romney with the announcement to be made during Wed. dabate.”
timr
Too late. It would create too much confusion and would please no one. I had suggested that Sarah be swapped out at the VP debate with absolutely no explanation – just act like it had always been the person they swapped in (I’d suggested Ridge). There may have been time then.
Although, maybe kittens. Maybe they should swap “Cuda out for a basket full of adorable kittens for VP. Everyone loves kittens. What could it hurt?
October 13, 2008 at 11:03 am
McCain should be pulling Palin around in a chariot – the best Hail to Mary if there ever was one. But he’s too feeble, and now the whole things a mess. Consequently, our hopes and dreams for Armageddon and any subsequent raptures must now lie with Black Satan.
October 13, 2008 at 11:15 am
I left OR, landed in MA, and suddenly, Obama’s leading with 53%, the highest of the campaign, The Editors are transmitting perfect sense again, Bush is 1% from reaching the lowest approval rating of any prez in 60 years, Krugman’s won a Nobel, etc&tc.
It’s clear I should move to MA more often to keep the universe in balance. I can’t divulge the secret mechanics of how it happens, other than to say it involves incantations and homages paid to Yaz, The Chief, Doug Flutie and Bobby Orr.
October 13, 2008 at 3:41 pm
Charisma multiplied by demographical shifts makes the GOP severely endangered, especially since they’ll swing further Nationalistic Right after their coming ass-kicking. Reactionary Monoliths!
October 13, 2008 at 3:51 pm
McCain will try to push it hard during the debate and end up looking more like Admiral Stockdale.
No, you can’t swap veeps at this stage without looking weak, desperate, and pathetic. I’ll ask Vice President Eagleton, though.
Romney is a gaffe machine who people don’t like. In fact they think he’s a giant talking asshole.
Obama just has to continue to look cool like Don Draper, lean against the Coke Machine in the hallway between classes, date Mindy Struthers not Alison Kimball, and he’ll win Class President for sure. Then President Biden will roll up his sleeves and New New Deal this muthafucka’ with 60 Democratic Senators and a arsefull in the House.
October 13, 2008 at 4:22 pm
Really good reason not to let up,
http://snagfilms.com/films/watch/inside_the_bubble/
The Kerry Campaign from the inside in the final days, thought they had a landslide on their hands. Good film.
October 14, 2008 at 3:55 am
The only demographic shift which could favor the Republicans nowadays would be a massive influx of Neanderthals. Conservative ones.
October 26, 2008 at 7:43 pm
[...] that’s because that’s when most of these ideas were coined. While it is great fun for wingnut yahoos to relive the glory days when National Review was still taken seriously by people who matter, most [...]
December 31, 2008 at 6:50 pm
[...] John McCain - The whole Sarah Palin romance-gone-wrong, supporting waterboarding, courting the crazies, getting the crazies, being The Crazy, Joe the [...]