No idea what this means, but I’ll take it:
White people are faced with either a negro or a total nutter who happens to have a pale face. Personally I’d prefer the negro. National Socialists are not mindless haters. Here, I see a white man, who is almost dead, who declares he wants to fight endless wars around the globe to make the world safe for Judeo-capitalist exploitation, who supports the invasion of America by illegals–basically a continuation of the last eight years of Emperor Bush. Then, we have a black man, who loves his own kind, belongs to a Black-Nationalist religion, is married to a black women–when usually negroes who have ‘made it’ immediately land a white spouse as a kind of prize–that’s the kind of negro that I can respect. Any time that a prominent person embraces their racial heritage in a positive manner, it’s good for all racially minded folks. Besides, America cares nothing for the interests of the white American worker, while having a love affair with just about every non-white on planet Earth. It’d be poetic justice to have a non-white as titular chief over this decaying modern Sodom and Gomorrah.
Which offsets the McCain KKK endorsement nicely. (That’s the KKK endorsing McCain, and not the other way around. We’re still capable of these sorts of distinctions.) A proof, perhaps, of the European flavor of modern American liberalism? Or the yahoo factor – the Klan, with its fancy dress and its Wizards and Dragons and so forth seeming to have more in common with LARPing than even fringe politics. Say what you will about the tenets of National Socialism, dude, at least it’s an ethos.
We are on the verge of, quite likely, choosing today as our next President a highly-qualified black man, instead of a crazy white man representing a disliked political party’s failed agenda. Perhaps as few as 45% of participating adults, here in the early November of AD 2008, will vote for the crazy man promising failure. There are certainly all kinds of fascinating reasons why people do what they do, and it is one of life’s mercies that I don’t have to listen to them. It would be wrong to impute all the votes for McCain to racism, or to impute the votes for Obama to its absence, or to get too excited about the Triumph of Progress because perhaps as many as eleven out of twenty adults in the country, for reasons possibly perfectly bizarre, are willing to avail themselves of an alternative to shitting the national bed. All progress is marginal, I suppose. It seems that all this excitement over the possibility of choosing a clearly superior black candidate says as much about how far we have to go than how far we’ve come.
… California propositions, SC county measures.
November 4, 2008 at 9:13 am
I just can’t even process that kind of cognitive dissonance. Herr Nazi hates blacks, Herr Nazi is a white nationalist, he believes Obama is a black nationalist, so Obama’s OK by Herr Nazi. Does he work for Fox News or something?
November 4, 2008 at 9:14 am
I think it has more to do with an economic Katrina happening on the incumbent party’s watch, but let’s hope the wingnuts stay true to their word and veer more sharply to the right after today.
November 4, 2008 at 9:33 am
This whole phenom has put me in mind of the bumperstickers sported by lots of Louisianans back in the day when Edwin Edwards was running for governor against David Duke. “Vote for the Crook – It’s Important!!!” This has come to mind many times as I’ve heard the apocryphal story of the Western PA woman who answered the door of an Obama canvasser; asked who she was going to vote for, she said, “let me ask my husband – he’s watching the game” and then hollered the question to him. The canvasser hears the husband yell back, “we’re voting for the n***er!!!” And the wife turns serenely back to the canvasser and reiterates, “we’re voting for the n***er.” I say “apocryphal”, but I’ve heard the same from my friend in Ft. Smith Arkansas – who said that her blue-collar son had reported that he and all his co-workers were going to “vote for the n***er”.
As you say, progress of a sort I suppose. Perhaps the next 4-8 years will result in a lot more of it.
November 4, 2008 at 9:37 am
I say “apocryphal”, but I’ve heard the same from my friend in Ft. Smith Arkansas – who said that her blue-collar son had reported that he and all his co-workers were going to “vote for the n***er”…As you say, progress of a sort I suppose.
cf.
November 4, 2008 at 11:20 am
So our Nazi buddy is supporting Obamna because McCain is too close to the Jews?
Fab
yoo
luss
November 4, 2008 at 12:36 pm
That is a real dilemma, that right there. Someone should write a novel.
November 4, 2008 at 1:00 pm
If I have high expectations, does that make me a hard bigot?
November 4, 2008 at 1:33 pm
choosing today as our next President a highly-qualified black man
We will know racism has run its course when we choose as our next President the idiot son of a lineage of progressively less competent black men. (And probably not long after that, we will elect a highly qualified woman President.)
November 4, 2008 at 3:15 pm
If I have high expectations, does that make me a hard bigot?
That depends on whether those expectations include the prospect of attending a party populated by a bevy of hip hop video girls that lust achingly for herr doktor bimler…
November 4, 2008 at 3:55 pm
“It would be wrong… to get too excited about the Triumph of Progress…”
It’s true. These crotchlesss Tigger suits can squeeze a liter of sweat off a humper before he’s even done licking her plush.
We know people with what we feel are good intentions and wise ideologies are often inconsistent and incompetent and not uncommonly end up, ultimately, moonwalking backwards to their own other side.
So why expect neo-Nazis to be fully consistent with an ideology that was cross- rectally counter-screwed when it was first reverse-engineered from The Protocols of EoZ?
And NEVER argue with the cherries on top of the biggest chocolate fudge sundae since MLK packed the National Mall in D.C. ’63 with the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom.
People will think you don’t like cherries.
November 4, 2008 at 5:17 pm
I think what he’s trying to say is that sometimes apples are oranges, except when they are potatoes or white american workers.
November 4, 2008 at 6:16 pm
Voting Endorsements – 2008 California Propositions
1 – High Speed Rail – Yes
2 – Standards for Confining Farm Animals – Yes
3 – Children’s Hospital Bond – Yes
4- Constitutional Amendment – Abortion Choice Restrictions – NO
5 – Nonviolent Drug Offensives Sentencing, Parole, and Rehab – Yes
6 – Criminal Penalties and Law, Removing Judicial Discretion – NO
7 – Renewable Energy Generation – NO, (I agree in principle but this is a poorly written law.)
8 – Constitutional Amendment to Eliminate Right of same sex-couples to Marry – NO
9 – Parole and Victim’s Rights – NO (Redundant law, prop is misleading)
10 – Bonds for Natural Gas Vehicle Purchase Refunds – NO, (See 7)
11 – Redistricting to Benefit California GOP – NO
12 – Veterans’ Bond Act – Yes
November 5, 2008 at 2:59 am
or to get too excited about the Triumph of Progress
It occurred to me a while ago that the monument in Paris is called the Arc de Triomphe because ‘Omphe’ must be French for ‘archway’, and it has three of them. If it only had two arches, then it would be the Arc de Diomphe.
November 5, 2008 at 3:13 am
And then people wonder why I refuse to entertain the concept of separate races and think that the word itself helps racists…