~VOTING IS NOW OPEN~
Previous winners:
2005 - Barbara Bush – “Katrina worked out really well for poor people”
2006 - Dan Reihl, ”Neighbors With Attitude“*
* Decided by the Ghost of William Rehnquist
Hello, I’m Kip Winger. You may remember me from such classic songs as “(She’s Only) Seventeen” and “(She’s Only) Seventeen (Unplugged)”. When I heard that The Editors wanted me to host the nominations for the Wank of the Year, I knew that was an opportunity that only comes around once in lifetime, so I put on my Magical Crown of Wingnuttery and transformed myself into a SOLID GOLD JPEG so I could be more easily uploaded to this weblog. For such is the Kipmas magic which comes in every bottle of Pert Plus!
Lots of wanks embarrass the wanker; but, for Wank of the Year, that’s not enough. A truly outstanding wank should humiliate the audience, shame the human race, and really raise some serious questions about whether this whole “Big Bang” enterprise was really such a hot idea. And of all this wanks which wankers have wunk, only one will be awarded me, The Golden Winger, the most storied prize in all of Wingnuttia!
(LEGAL DISCLAIMER: all Golden Winger selections are subject to review at any time by Ghosts of Kipmas Past.)
The Nominees for the 2008 Golden Winger for Wank of the Year:
1. Pam Atlas, “Malcolm X was Obama’s dad“
After winning the 2006 Palme D’Haire, she should really be disqualified from future prizes. Also, she’s clearly insane, and making fun of her is like poking sticks through the bars at Bellvue. So why is she nominated? FOR I, KIP WINGER, HAVE DECREED IT SO! So thrill to the majesty of Pam’s 30,000 page opus explaining how Google can prove that Barack Obama is the illegitimate child of Scary Sixties Black Dude Malcolm X. Or, if you don’t want to waste a week and give yourself a brain tumor, just admire the wanktoitiveness required to make such an idiot of yourself. Even on the internets, she is something special.
2. Jonah Golberg, Liberal Fascism
The Doughy Pantload. The Jonanist. Doughbob Loadpants. 4-Way Dough Cube. By whatever name you know him, Jonah Goldberg proved in 2008 that his runaway 2005 Chickenhawk of the Year win was no fluke. His long-delayed masterpiece was praised to the stars by critics, provided these critics were wearing Jonah Goldberg’s ample pants. Conservatives turned away in disgrace, liberals pointed and laughed, monkeys peed in their mouths, and Jonah defended himself from this abuse with hilarious self-abuse. Wanktastic.
3. Fred Hiatt, “The Intelligence Committee says whatever I says it says“
Fred Hiatt. Editorial page editor of the Washington Post. Utter wanker. Here, he combats the scourge of mean bumper stickers by pretending that the Select Committee on Intelligence’s “Phase 2” report on the use of intelligence to sell the Iraq War completely exhonerates the Bush Administration, when, in fact, anyone who looked at it for five minutes could see it did exactly the opposite. Not as creative as Pam What’s-Her-Name, but as brazen a wank as you are ever likely to see.
4. Larry Johnson, The Whitey Album
Michelle Obama blames everything on “Whitey” at a secret Black Panther meeting hosted by OJ Simpson and Louis Farrakhan and Fitty Cent! Video here!
5. Sarah Palin, “Disagreeing with me is unconstitutional!“
Here is how a free press should vet a Vice-President:
December 26, 2008 at 10:47 am
Good lord, they’re all winners.
December 26, 2008 at 11:16 am
Good lord, they’re all winners.
Yes, in the sense that winner = loser.
December 26, 2008 at 11:22 am
I again went with a dark horse (Hiatt), just to be a bit contrarian. These awards are starting to resemble the Oscars–the prize predictably goes to whoever played the most pitifully handicapped or mentally challenged role.
Wait a sec…I guess that’s the point.
December 26, 2008 at 11:31 am
They would all make worthy winners it’s such a shame that only one can. I hope the eventual winner remembers to thank his mother in his winner’s speech.
December 26, 2008 at 11:41 am
jane says:
“i hope the eventual winner remembers to
thankwank his mother…”fixed.
also, matt barber at clownhall saying we are all baal worshipping homobortionists surely is a late whipped horse pulling into the lead out of nowhere–that is a wanking of absolute first order and should not be missed by anyone.
http://townhall.com/columnists/MattBarber/2008/12/22/the_gods_of_liberalism
December 26, 2008 at 11:42 am
They’re all deserving, but only Jonah demonstrated the capacity to deliver a book-length money shot of stupidity.
December 26, 2008 at 11:49 am
CLearly SOMEONE stopped reading Pam Atlas part way through!
December 26, 2008 at 11:53 am
Where the FUCK is the Great Porn Dragon??? This is an OUTRAGE!!1!
(Shit, there should be an award named the “Great Porn Dragon” in future years, for bravely identifying subversive liberal threats to our democracy.)
December 26, 2008 at 12:29 pm
Damn you for putting Pam Atlas up against the greatest piece of wankery since Onan. Jonah’s getting his award for “The White Man is the Jew of Liberal Fascism” already. This just isn’t fair.
December 26, 2008 at 12:45 pm
There’s no way Liberal Fascism isn’t the wank of this or any other year, so I’m voting for it, but I’m hoping his victory here doesn’t imperil his chances for the Palme.
December 26, 2008 at 12:46 pm
I believe that the correct link for the Whitey Video is this one.
December 26, 2008 at 1:03 pm
It can’t be anyone else other than Jonah. He created a webpage devoted to defending his wankery, publishing praise (sometimes fake!) from emailers and listing places where his book was spotted.
There’s so much goodness that I can’t recall it all. The several title changes. Jonah forgetting why we call Mussolini a fascist (hint: same reason Obama is called a Democrat). His defense of “you really need to be careful of who you call fascists, you fascists!”
Like a good sitcom, his wankery had spinoffs (remember the female blogger who loudly asked for it in the famous New York Grand Central Station). He gave this site, Sadly No, Orcinus and others months of quality material. I can’t remember any other wankery that created such a cottage industry of mockery.
December 26, 2008 at 1:36 pm
There’s no way Liberal Fascism isn’t the wank of this or any other year…
Liberal Fascism = Wank of Ages
December 26, 2008 at 2:29 pm
I’m torn. I was ready to dismiss Pam’s effort out of hand–until I actually looked at it. This is Dr. Bronner-class ranting, albeit insanely evil instead of idiosyncratically benign. When I got to Jomo Kenyatta I had to leave the room and collect myself.
Still, in the end, I think Jonah claims the coveted statuette–not only for the sheer audacity ™ of the conceit, but for the opera buffa manner of its presentation. The whininess, the self-regard, the self-serious seriousness, the touchy defense of his “reputation” while producing an entire book (over three years) that confuses similarities with identity and metaphor with analysis. And all to prove a ludicrous thesis the truth of which increases only as its triviality increases.
Sorry, Pam, but a lunatic caught on film doesn’t get an acting Oscar. She’s just being herself. Liberal Fascism, though, is a *performance.*
December 26, 2008 at 2:57 pm
[...] start with The Editors, who list the nominations for Wank of the Year, 2008. It’s an impressive list with [...]
December 26, 2008 at 2:59 pm
[...] start with The Editors, who list the nominations for Wank of the Year, 2008. It’s an impressive list with several [...]
December 26, 2008 at 3:18 pm
So one may ask: Why did the Ayn Randians copulate with fundies?
For the sake of a Brazen New Wankery? So Jesus would weep over the aborted movement of bowel conservatism? To produce ‘eraserhead baby’ bloggers?
Fools! The message unseen is the truth delivered!
December 26, 2008 at 4:01 pm
Palin’s entry is a live action performance art piece entitled, “Moose Meat Pie.” I had to award that.
December 26, 2008 at 5:10 pm
Wow! Jonah is walking waddling away with this one!!
December 26, 2008 at 5:10 pm
Wow! Jonah is
walkingwaddling away with this one!!December 26, 2008 at 5:39 pm
All of Jonah’s prose is full of that meaningless, unctuous, meandering prose that makes sure to say everything while meaning nothing, all posed in a way so that he can blame his errors on his readers or his researchers or his valves, but Pammy just flies in on a zip line of insanity, hits the ground running, promptly lands on her face, and continues chugging her crazy little legs until she’s wriggled over the finish line. I appreciate her absolute dedication to word salad.
December 26, 2008 at 7:08 pm
I appreciate her absolute dedication to word salad.
If by “dedication” you mean her willingness to skip her meds for our personal enjoyment, I must concur.
December 26, 2008 at 7:28 pm
Even though Jonah fully deserves this award, I voted for Fred, because I don’t believe he is as fully aware of the contempt with which he is regarded by sane people as is Jonah. Plus, he has a bigger megaphone.
Maybe Fred’s behavior is related to living in a bubble DC, or maybe having some incriminating pictures of Donald Graham.
December 26, 2008 at 7:56 pm
Jeebus jumping h christ people. I know jonah a big, old fat target. jonah is an idiot (a likening which makes even idiots cringe). But how can pammy be so far behind? She’s wingnuttiest. Even if you compare panny to palin, pammy just walks away with it.
December 26, 2008 at 8:00 pm
I picked Hiatt because his wank appeared in the pages of an allegedly-respectable newspaper, and so did the most damage. The day Dan Froomkin no longer writes for the WaPo is the day it ceases to have any redeeming value.
December 26, 2008 at 11:47 pm
Wow. I feel dingy just reading that post.
December 27, 2008 at 12:22 am
Jonah wins (well, for a certain definition of “wins”) because he really did seem to think he’d produced a defensible work of important and original scholarship, and not yet-another-slot-filler on Regnery’s conveyor belt of brain-chum for true believers. He was genuinely confused and upset that liberals didn’t take his YUO=HITLER argument seriously. That’s wanking we can believe in, my friends.
December 27, 2008 at 6:59 am
This is why I didn’t vote for Pantload earlier. I knew Liberal Facism was a lock for Wank of the Year.
There have been many of discussions along the lines of, “When historians of the future try to determine what went wrong with the modern conservative movement, they should look at…”
Liberal Facism is the one.
December 27, 2008 at 7:00 am
…and I spelled “fascism” wrong twice.
In my defense, I don’t type the word that often (unlike a certain wanker).
December 27, 2008 at 7:26 am
Liberal Fascism— the “Sgt. Pepper” of wankery.
Kneel before the master, all other rightwing whackjobs!
December 27, 2008 at 9:46 am
Liberal Fascism is the liberal fascism of liberal fascism.
Think about it.
December 27, 2008 at 11:46 am
What Mr. Wonderful said.
December 27, 2008 at 1:12 pm
Pam and Jonah are both very worthy but I think the truly epic performance in wankery of one Larry Johnson is being underappreciated in this forum.
Pam is, as the Editors note, insane. Her screed is built upon the same logic that all crazy conspiracy theorists use which is that small bits of truth always add up to one big crazy truth.
Jonah is just trying to be deliberately provocative. He is just too stupid to pull it off.
But Johnson posits, and apparently still believes, despite the lack of any visual or audio evidence at all, that a highly educated black woman who was not born in the 30’s actually speaks, in public, as if she were a cast member on Sanford and Son. He thinks Michelle Obama, a perfectly gracious woman, actually sounds like the “on-stage” persona of Sherman Helmsley or Redd Foxx when she is discussing serious issues with other black people. I don’t know how that could not get my vote.
December 27, 2008 at 1:57 pm
Fred Hiatt deserves some sort of recognition for the damage he inflicted upon the English language by inventing the word ‘exhonerates’.
December 27, 2008 at 2:40 pm
In fact, I think you’ll most likely find the Whitey tape at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZi6U811hxE.
You’re welcome.
December 27, 2008 at 4:21 pm
It was a hard choice but I went with Larry Johnson because of the way he stubbornly, persistently, pushed the video businesses.
It wasn’t just insane wankery or book-length wankery, it was serial wankery. And that should count for something.
December 28, 2008 at 9:42 am
That’s Val Kilmer’s face under the Golden Wingnuts, yes? A good choice. It shows your finer breeding. I too was raised by white lab rats.
December 28, 2008 at 9:45 am
“When I got to Jomo Kenyatta I had to leave the room and collect myself.”
This is perhaps the most classic pomo neo-neo-Raymond Chandler distillation ever.
Dang Pan-Am teleporters. Some reassembly may be required?
December 28, 2008 at 9:55 am
Choosing among these “worthy” nominees is painful indeed.
1. Pam is truly insane, which gives her both an unfair advantage and simultaneously, a pass. Since she can’t really be held responsible for her actions, neither can she be credited with accomplishment. Sorry Pam, I’m going to settle for hoping you find a comfortable room in a maximum security facility, where both you and we will be safer.
2. Jonah, Jonah, Jonah. Not insane, but obviously a complete moron. Again, as with Pam, it seems unfair to either praise or blame him for things that are beyond his control.
3. Fweddie. Stupid, but reliable. Rarely does he make any sense, and his opinions are unquestionably damaging to the interests of every decent person on Earth. However, he lacks something — I can’t quite put my finger on it — that causes me to consider him a perennial runner-up. He’s got a huge soapbox, but he always seems to shrink in both stature and importance when he mounts it.
4. Sarah. She’s a newcomer and we’re likely to have many opportunities to vote for her in the future. I suspect that what we saw this year was just the tip of the iceberg. She’ll be back and my guess is she’ll be dumber, less articulate, more superficial, and hugely more offensive given the intensive coaching she so obviously needs. Therefore, although she is a worthy contender, I’m going to save her for later. She has so much raw talent that I wouldn’t be surprised to see her win future competitions by acclamation.
5. Curly, Moe, and Larry. Ah, Larry. Seldom has anyone distinguished himself so famously by being both a total fool and a complete scumbag simultaneously. Larry’s website is truly one of the low points of the Intertubes. His fellow posters are all skilled practitioners in the art of character assassination, delusional group think, and flights of noxious fancy, and it would be difficult to find a more offensive crew than No Quarter’s regular commenters. At the helm of the S.S. Cesspool is Larry himself, whose supreme accomplishment — The Whitey Tape — was unchallenged this past election for its repulsiveness, lameness, idiocy, dishonesty, and in the end, non-existence. Only the Wank of the Year could have continued to promise to deliver something that didn’t exist (or that wasn’t even remotely what it was claimed to be) in the hope that something imaginary would defeat Barack Obama and deliver the nation to the profoundly unqualified and dangerous John McCain. Larry exhibited some of the qualities that have made such historical luminaries as Joseph McCarthy, Richard Nixon, and Ollie North justifiably (in)famous.
In the end, the utter lack of drama in the failure of the Whitey Tape to appear and slay the Marxist villain was proof that Larry is unrivaled in his pure wankosity. I suspect that Larry will never achieve anything remotely resembling credibility or even widespread visibility. I fear that this may be the one and only chance I (or we) have to cast a vote for such a complete fraud and I can not let that opportunity pass.
If I could vote twice, I’d cast both for Larry.
December 28, 2008 at 1:20 pm
I have to disagree with oh really about the Load Warrior. He’s not a moron, he’s actually fairly bright. The reason he writes the things he does is the same reason any ideologue writes things he knows are bullshit: because he believes the end justifies the means. So, no, not stupid, just evil.
Also, the fact that a legitimate publisher saw fit to put Liberal Fascism on the nation’s bookshelves is a permanent stain on the nation as a whole. That’s why Jonah’s got my vote.
December 28, 2008 at 4:03 pm
I declare an unscientific bias – the Jonah Goldberg spinning GIF has hypnotized a portion of your electorate.
December 28, 2008 at 10:10 pm
Watch these, then just try to vote for someone other than Jonah.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lWbPVonvGGo
December 29, 2008 at 11:30 am
What an embarrassment of riches!
Sure, Jonah’s work took years of effort and involved an entire new blog in its defense, but I think Pam’s was, at its core, wankier. I remember that moment when I first saw it… right then and there, I knew who I’d be voting for.
December 29, 2008 at 1:04 pm
All voters will receive a free Chin Chin EP “Go There With You”
http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/article/download/148137-new-music-chin-chin-go-there-with-you-mp3
Here:http://www.definitivejux.net/store/catalog/freeshit/
December 29, 2008 at 1:08 pm
As true initiates know, it is The Grand Majestic Golden Porn Dragon of the East and South Selah, so mote it be, and the Juwees are they that will not be blamed for nothing.
And ‘do ye this brother, for the sake of a widow’s son?’
December 29, 2008 at 1:10 pm
Nuh-uh. Jonah is a paid writer with co-workers who had to give nods to the fucking thing. Like Michael Ledeen. Jonah gets points for farting in the elevator with all his pals and then asking their opinion of it.
December 29, 2008 at 1:54 pm
A landslide! The whale in the belly of a Jonah!
December 29, 2008 at 1:57 pm
It can’t be anyone else other than Jonah. He created a webpage devoted to defending his wankery, publishing praise (sometimes fake!) from emailers and listing places where his book was spotted.
Fake praise? Really? That’s hilarious. How do you know, though? Did someone like Sifu slip something in that sounds like praise but has a double meaning? Link, please.
December 29, 2008 at 4:57 pm
Rigged, I say! How is Larry Johnson not running away with this?
Shouldn’t LaJo’s early period Jim Carrey haircut put him over the top? Please bestow the Wank upon its rightful recipient.
December 29, 2008 at 10:49 pm
I have to go with Larry Johnson, too. I’d disagree with “oh really” only on the small detail that LJ didn’t care about McCain so much, as he just fucking hated Obama. He was willingly to see McCain be president, but only because he is a self involved adolescent—and doesn’t adolescence imply wanking?
This may be the highest(lowest) LJ will be ever be able to rise (sink). Give him his due.
December 30, 2008 at 1:58 am
I dunno, The Editors, I have to vote for you… After all, I can’t fight this feeling anymore, I don’t know what I was fighting for… And by voting for you, I mean in all categories… I really mean it… seriously… no really:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=67Fb8XbpWMM
Doesn’t this all sum up our little relationship of heavy petting, and saying we have to go home, y’know, curfew and all? Man, my folks are suck A-holes…
This is my love tape and vote in all categories for you Teh edititores! Viva Che!
December 30, 2008 at 5:59 am
I declare an unscientific bias – the Jonah Goldberg spinning GIF has hypnotized a portion of your electorate.
Must be the Southern Hemisphere version of the Doughphist–he’s spinning clockwise.
December 30, 2008 at 8:40 am
Ooh. Power ballad!
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f2/Ec-hasslau.de_010.jpg
December 30, 2008 at 8:46 am
Kip is headed for a heartbreak. So sad.
December 30, 2008 at 12:25 pm
[...] At the bottom of the year… (pause) …I remember how much I hate this time of year. But let’s go through the obligatory motions, shall we? (pause) Vote for Wank of the Year! [...]
December 30, 2008 at 9:20 pm
Hiatt, not for any specific hilarious act of wanking but on general principles.
December 30, 2008 at 10:01 pm
Honestly, I was torn between Larry and Jonah. The spinning Jonah GIF sold me. His face smarm appears to be enhanced through rotation.
December 30, 2008 at 10:37 pm
What, no lame ass writing ability awards?
I could win that typing with my nose!
December 30, 2008 at 11:15 pm
I understand the desire to be contrarian and defy expectations, but sometimes there just are facts of the matter. For instance, Jonah Goldberg is, literally, the definition of a wanker. There’s no question on this one — it’s like Best Supporting Actor to Heath Ledger — come on.
December 30, 2008 at 11:15 pm
Closey linkey.
December 31, 2008 at 9:18 am
Dear The Editors and other esteemed members of the Academy -
Isn’t it about time that Pantload received his very own Jonah W. (for Wankerific) Thalberg Award (maybe rename it the “Wankberg Award”?), as someone “whose bodies of work reflect a consistently high quality of wankery”. It could also be combined with the Academy’s lifetime achievement award, thus ensuring that the Doughy One gets the recognition he deserves – forever.
This would have the added benefit of allowing such rising stars such as Pammy and LJ to vie for the award, without having to worry about Jonah crushing them like cockroaches.
I see this as a win-win scenario.
Sincerely,
SFAW
December 31, 2008 at 10:24 am
I voted for Johan because only he managed to get his offal on the NY Times bestseller list, and in so doing not only reached (probably – if the Times’ numbers are real and not inflated by bogus think tank book dumps) the largest number of readers with his monumental stool sample, but also had his bankrupt ideology validated by a soon-to-be bankrupt medium. A win-win all the way around.
December 31, 2008 at 10:25 am
I second SFAW’s motion.
December 31, 2008 at 10:30 am
Fake praise? Really? That’s hilarious. How do you know, though? Did someone like Sifu slip something in that sounds like praise but has a double meaning? Link, please.
Here’s one:
http://lefarkins.blogspot.com/2008/01/dear-jonah-i-am-not-serious-either.html
December 31, 2008 at 10:47 am
While I agree that Pam’s and Larry Johnson’s wankery is first-class, I believe that another category should be created for obviously insane people who believe obviously insane conspiracy theories (all of the fake-birth-certificate people and the islamic-crescent-911-memorial people should be in this category as well). Bug-fuck insanity and conscious wankery are really two different things.
December 31, 2008 at 12:09 pm
This is a tough call. I read Pammy’s entry until I got to the part where she claimed Mercer Island High School was a hotbed of Commie activity, and then I had to give it up. That alone makes her stand out for me.
But there’s something to admire about Palin coming out so late in the year, with such extreme and narcissistic wankery.
Hiatt just doesn’t rise to that level, and Jonah – well, Jonah’s entire career is a wankstain, so I think he needs a lifetime achievement award instead.
I think I’m going to back the dark horse, Palin.
December 31, 2008 at 12:16 pm
That’s an interesting award name. I think I beat it though with the 1st annual Abandoned Stuff Super Post Of The Year Award, however. The A.S.S.P.O.T.Y. Award is a combination of my judgment (so sucking up may help), along with reader voting.
http://www.abandonedstuff.com/2008/12/30/super-post-of-2008-contest/
You and your readers are very welcome to participate for the meager prize.
December 31, 2008 at 12:18 pm
Oh, and for the Wank of the Year, I think Palin ought to come in 2nd, since that is what made her famous in 2008.
December 31, 2008 at 3:54 pm
Here’s one:
http://lefarkins.blogspot.com/2008/01/dear-jonah-i-am-not-serious-either.html
LOL. I’d forgotten about that, even though I commented in that thread.
December 31, 2008 at 5:34 pm
I enjoy Doughy, or Oedipal Wreckx, his AKC papers name. So lets prop the pinkskin tub of goo up for another year. Yes, make the self-absorbed nitwit king of all Fools.
December 31, 2008 at 6:17 pm
what about Gonzo’s statement that he’s one of the victims of the war on terror? I realize it’s a late entry, but it’s still a beyond-ridiculous statement made in 2008.
December 31, 2008 at 11:07 pm
[...] perhaps we are. Elsewhere there are the nominees for the 2008 Golden Winger Wank of Year, and among those nominees is Pam Atlas carefully making the case that Malcolm X was Barack [...]
January 1, 2009 at 1:45 am
Glenn Greenwald pointed out a wanker who will contribute to our collective ignorance for years to come, and get paid and praised for it. This guy makes a mochery of the founding fathers best efforts to provide for a fourth estate that will act as a check to the unbridled power of the state. And David Gregory does not seem to have a clue of the burden he carries as a member of that group. He rankers wankerdom in a special way. We don’t need another useful idiot who can blindly deliver the administrations message. It’s a shame when a comedy show (TDS) is more relevant to ferreting out the truth of a situation than our news programs.
David Gregory, “I think there are a lot of critics who think that . . . . if we did not stand up and say this is bogus, and you’re a liar, and why are you doing this, that we didn’t do our job. I respectfully disagree. It’s not our role.”
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/12/29/gregory/index.html
January 1, 2009 at 4:07 am
Yep – a bunch of wankers.
January 1, 2009 at 6:09 am
I have to give it to Palin only because she has a National stage and could possibly do more damage than the other wanks. Although they all deserve the award.
January 1, 2009 at 7:54 am
Pam Atlas would get my vote if she took off her top!
January 1, 2009 at 7:41 pm
Is that the Pam of Atlas Shrugs?She`s not crazy in the clinical sense.She`s just a untreated alcoholic.She`s crazy drunk.
January 2, 2009 at 10:57 am
She`s not crazy in the clinical sense.She`s just a untreated alcoholic.
The two are not mutually exclusive.
January 3, 2009 at 5:06 am
Whoa whoa whoa—we don’t want her either; she has no place in our ranks.
shawn214
President
January 3, 2009 at 8:20 am
Why does “wanker” have such an obsessive hold on your intellects? Maybe you could write a book titled Wankers and put the word wanker on every page. Doesn’t that sound like a sure way to make the New York Times best seller list?
If you’ve got nothing better then you’ve got nothing, you wankers.
January 3, 2009 at 11:19 am
So, I finally looked at Pammycakes screed. Wow. To summarize:
All the coloreds look alike and they all know each other. Whitey should run scared.
Maybe Larry J is feeding her material.
January 3, 2009 at 6:16 pm
So, I finally looked at Pammycakes screed. Wow. To summarize:
All the coloreds look alike and they all know each other. Whitey should run scared.
Wait a minute – you mean to say they don’t? (And I believe the term is “darkies”, OK?)
And what’s your problem with Larry? He’s widely acknowledged to be the second most reputable investigative journalist in Teh World!! (It was a tight contest, but Chief Editor Korir takes the prize).