Bill Kristol has slithered back to Reptoid headquarters, and the NY Times is looking for a simulacrum. WANTED: Latest incarnation of the William Safire With A Thousand Faces. Should be my social better, yet comfortable condescending to the tastes and mores of faceless heartland proles. Must be fluent in contrarianism, and keep current with the latest movement-approved mock outrages. Dead eyes and lizardish smile a plus, but not required. All the suggested replacements are of this horribly boring genus. The best attempted justification for this policy is that it will “sell newspapers to the country’s educated, affluent, urban classes”, because affluent, educated, urban classes like to read abridged novelizations of CNN’s “Crossfire” with their fair trade coffee and effete, Frenchified breakfast pastries. Or, you know, whatever.
The best attempted “outside the box” suggestion is to cut out the middlemen hand it directly over to Rush Limbaugh. Limbaugh, unlike any of the bowtie conservatives who package his ideas for polite society, actually has an audience and a constituency, making his opinions A) politically relevant and B) likely to bring new readership. Better still would be to hire Kaye Grogan, who is even more entertaining and representative of populist conservatism, is a snappy dresser besides, and isn’t even a disgusting fucking junkie. On the downside, she might be dead, which some may consider a drawback. I just think it would make the choice that much bolder.
Alternately: instead of asking frequent guests on CNN’s “Crossfire” to translate their schtick into short essay form, you could find a dozen people who are actually knowledgeable about some important area of public concern, and let them inform your readership. People whose opinions might be worth more than, say, mine, and might be derived from sources other than political/professional necessity. Consider Quality before highly contrived ideas of Balance. And, seeing as the Times’ time-tested strategies for “sell[ing] newspapers to [anybody with two quarters]” are miserable failures, and “Crossfire” got cancelled, it might not be such a crazy idea.
January 26, 2009 at 7:44 pm
“Kaye Grogan”
Scarier than Tammy Faye and I don’t even want to know why.
January 26, 2009 at 7:45 pm
“…a disgusting fucking junkie. ”
I thought he liked cigars? Or was that Monica? Or am I just mixing metaphorical orifices?
January 26, 2009 at 7:47 pm
“…People whose opinions might be worth more than, say, mine…”
Pimp my ignorance, bitche(s)!
January 26, 2009 at 9:23 pm
Behold the undead. She’s unmistakeable!
January 26, 2009 at 9:24 pm
a disgusting fucking junkie
Correction. A flaccid fucking junkie. Who also happens to be a traitor who wants his country to fail. Might as well stick him in the NYT. He should be able to meet their “standards”.
January 26, 2009 at 9:26 pm
Oops, let me try that again. I was too excited to remember basic html:
Behold the undead.
January 27, 2009 at 12:21 am
She needs help .
January 27, 2009 at 12:56 am
This is the bold reporting, er commentary? Where is the illustrative cartoon? If I am to sell out, sir, I must have my pound of flesh? Dr. Todd, sir, won’t you serve me up a close shave? Or a Meat-Pie mayhaps? Here I visit your wourld, but you don’t satisfy my hunger…
Is it true what they say???
Awful, ain’t it sire? I’d so wish’d to see the motely crew devouring ‘emselves… An’ wot? This spec’ticle? F’rst ‘ndred days indeed. Whish I was there for t’ last… Eh-eh… That’ll be a giunea or so t’ keep me mouth shut… ‘less you shut it for me, m’lord…
January 27, 2009 at 1:28 am
“sell[ing] newspapers to [anybody with two quarters]”
That would be anyone with $1.50
They need a pure spite-wingnut, now that Friedman’s rebranding himself as the only man with the gravitas to bring us back from the edge of the abyss Friedman was the only man with the gravitas to leave us tottering on the brink of, and MoDo’s all starry-eyed about climbing to the top of the DC social order defending Obama from the red-eyed chittering evil of Hillary (I’m sure Michelle realizes the gaybaiting was just a trope).
Don’t worry about it. The overgrown adolescents sons-of who are running it right now are said to be seriously considering Megan McArdle. It’ll be just like Kristol never left, only with elf comparisons.
January 27, 2009 at 3:22 am
gravitas=enormity Lookitup I dare you…
January 27, 2009 at 10:15 am
I want the GOP to just totally fragment, so please put Ann Coulter on the ticket and let a crazy lady in a giant hat and purple Lizard Skin Boots write the op-ed’s at The Washington Post. Replace John The Mclaughlin’s group with a tribe of rabid, steroidal Baboons all named Johnny Bad Monkey. Please don’t take Conservatives from The Economist, Canada, or the beeb. Don’t evolve, learn, change, or meet the demands of the electoral consumer or otherwise remain remotely relevant, beyond the Confederacy of not enough electoral votes, and stagger off into a fucking tar pit and sink deep, down, into the tarry abyss, such that kids today will consider the GOP as curious as the Whigs.
January 27, 2009 at 10:46 am
GROGAN LIVES!!! http://www.martinsvillebulletin.com/article.cfm?ID=17462
January 27, 2009 at 11:51 am
cartesian, that was awesome.
Or should I say, Kaye, that awesome was.
I pray to the FSM that McMegan is not selected; hasn’t the succeeding-by-failing model done enough damage to this country?
January 27, 2009 at 11:58 am
Yes, cartersian, that was “awesome”.
And that’s just my opinion!
January 27, 2009 at 12:09 pm
whump, there it is.
January 27, 2009 at 2:39 pm
I’d like to nominate Daniel Larison for the position, if for nothing else than just for the column inches he can fill while never saying anything interesting, novel or consequential.
I mean, if you had 10,000 Daniel Larisons chained to typewriters for all of eternity, they would eventually produce the entire combined works of Shakespeare, all derivative plays, movies and books, as well as all works referecing (even in passing) some aspect of a Shakespearean play, all descriptions of paintings even tangentially related to Shakespeare, every historical or fictional work regarding Julius Caesar, Henry the Eighth, Tidus Andronicus, Jews or Smoochy, and all undergraduate essays dealing with any of the aforementioned; and none of this would matter because NO ONE GIVES A FLYING FUCKING FUCK ABOUT ANY OF THAT SHIT.
And yet he would be a good choice because some leveled-headed people (liberals even!) think he’s not half bad.
January 27, 2009 at 5:13 pm
Larry Kudlow. He’s a conservative, one-trick pony but at least he vaguely understands the markets.
January 27, 2009 at 6:05 pm
Why not just serialize these?
January 27, 2009 at 6:07 pm
Uh, I believe you meant “alternatively,” not “alternately.” Unless you meant they ought to flip back and forth, or something.
January 27, 2009 at 9:12 pm
I vote for a recurring blank space. It saves the cost of ink and a salary. Readers so motivated can hand print their own op/ed pieces in teeny-tiny letters and pretend that they’ve been given a voice. Personally, I would savor the blankness itself, a quiet oasis in a world of editorial gibberish.
January 28, 2009 at 3:59 am
Who fucking reads op-ed’s? I hope you’re reading them to your Grandma or to seniors at the center. G’damn.
January 28, 2009 at 7:30 am
Grace Nearing’s answer has a certain Zen-like translucent edginess to it. I like it — therefore it most certainly will not be done. OTOH:
instead of asking frequent guests on CNN’s “Crossfire” to translate their schtick into short essay form, you could find a dozen people who are actually knowledgeable about some important area of public concern, and let them inform your readership. People whose opinions might be worth more than, say, mine, and might be derived from sources other than political/professional necessity. Consider Quality before highly contrived ideas of Balance. And, seeing as the Times’ time-tested strategies for “sell[ing] newspapers to [anybody with two quarters]” are miserable failures, and “Crossfire” got cancelled, it might not be such a crazy idea.
is so out-of-the-box as to be “in left field”, literally. And besides, they already did that with Krugman, and just see where that got them…ahem. No more of that, thank you!
January 28, 2009 at 8:25 am
I’d like to nominate Daniel Larison for the position, if for nothing else than just for the column inches he can fill while never saying anything interesting, novel or consequential.
thanks, O’Sham. I was beginning to fear I was the only one admiring Larison for his breadth of vocabulary, elegance of prose and vacuity of ideas. He does have the advantage that he discounts any idea not grounded in Russian Orthodox belief, so he may have a wider audience than the remaining True Conservatives.
January 28, 2009 at 9:11 am
The should reprint the Federalist Papers. The conservatives would rejoice until they actually read them and realized how fucking far removed from our Founders’ intentions the half-assed wingnut ideology is.
January 28, 2009 at 9:27 am
I nominate the top columnist from Pravda English, Bat Boy.
January 28, 2009 at 9:32 am
I get my news from two sources: Pravda English and Weekly World News and I’m the most informed person I’ve never milked yet.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bat_boy
January 28, 2009 at 7:01 pm
Huzzah! Another plus for Larison! Get this guy to NY; the Times can’t wait for anyone better!
Whereas Jonah-pants, Atlas-pants and Milkin-pants wank in a kinetic, fruitful way (i.e., their wankery results in real, tangible things such as counter-top reviews and internet boycotts), Larison’s wankery is a more cerebral, almost theoretical wankery.
Take, for example, this comment on Larison’s blog. Commenter “Charlie” asks; “WHAT IF… an unjust war were prosecuted justly? WHAT IF the result of this was a moral abomination, but the means to achieve such were honorable? WHAT THEN LARISON?!” That Larison hasn’t answered yet can only be proof that he is mulling endlessly over this impossible, purely academic scenario.
This, in a nutshell, is what’s wrong with Larison. He believes so dearly in “conservativism” that when real-life conservatives wreck real-life havoc onto the world, he retreats into theory. As Digby says, “conservativism can never fail; it can only be failed.” For all the good it’s doing the world, our above commenter “Charlie” may as well have asked, “WHAT IF freedom and conservativism actually come from Burke’s behind, and smelled a lot, but we still wanted it anyway? WHAT THEN LARISON!?!”
…but hey! John Cole thinks Larison’s alright, so that means the rest of us should think so too, right? I mean, it’s not like John Cole’s ever done or supported anything monumentally stupid before, right?
January 28, 2009 at 7:21 pm
I want more dumb videos. New year’s not gettin’ any younger, fellas.
January 28, 2009 at 7:29 pm
(conga line chant) Mo dumb in my mo-DEM! Mo dumb in my mo-DEM!
Nothing like unbridled enthusiasm.
January 28, 2009 at 7:50 pm
If you don’t like The Knife, then you can’t post in this thread.
January 28, 2009 at 7:56 pm
Although not nearly as good as the armpit-singing guy, The Knife is still pretty good, imhp.
January 28, 2009 at 8:37 pm
But seriously, I think these appear to be major contenders for Kristol’s former, uh, slot:
wise, prudent, colorful, and flavored
January 28, 2009 at 8:41 pm
we have been monitoring your Earthling transmissions for a very long time now
January 28, 2009 at 8:57 pm
The 80s were awesome all over the world
January 28, 2009 at 9:01 pm
Elvis in Hell
January 28, 2009 at 9:16 pm
I’ve overloaded my shitty workstation with YouTube tabs, and now flash won’t work :(
January 28, 2009 at 9:51 pm
That’s when I use my hands to make shadow-animals against the computer screen. Especially cool if it’s CRT, because the strobe creates groovy time-distortion illusions.
January 29, 2009 at 4:46 pm
Very belatedly, I’d like to point out that Julia’s “Friedman’s rebranding himself as the only man with the gravitas to bring us back from the edge of the abyss Friedman was the only man with the gravitas to leave us tottering on the brink of” was fucking awesome.
January 31, 2009 at 7:57 pm
I have decided that I wish to place my name on the ballot for President, Congress, Senate, (any vacant senate seats) Local Mayor, etc… for the 2008 election-year cycle. I have seen the future 2009; it seems that the same douche-bag plastic cut-out, glad-handing pat-you-on-the-back-with-a-knife-in-hand-dash-dash-douche, crowd-reading zombie idiots will be in office unless you vote for me. Economy tanking? Let’s print more money! Yeah, adding a zero to everyone’s paycheck/welfarecheck is a great idea! WOo! Everyone will have more money! Milk will cost $3.00 a gallon, that is untill the retard waves of stupid adjust the price to it’s normal market value of $30/gal… Not to worry, when that happens I promise I will add ANOTHER zero to everyone’s paycheck! We will be a nation of zeros! NObama sounds stupid as a word, but what about using the Nobama symbol? I miss all the little ‘no-W’ stickers the Democrap douchebags used to put on their cars, now I need something new to laugh at (besides the fading ‘no-W’ stickers on the Democrap douchebag cars).
My slogan: ‘A nation of zeros, for I AM the ONE!!!’ Anyone with a contrary opinion will be silenced, tattooed, and shipped off to deat—-… er, reEdukation Kamps (for Kids!:+)
That way, we can all truly be winners! How inclusive of me!
January 31, 2009 at 8:01 pm
I forgot to mention that I have returned from the future, in my special PBR powered time-machine, lovingly handcrafted in Belgium, home of ‘Merican beer…
BURP!
February 2, 2009 at 5:37 am
But where IS Kaye Grogan? She hasn’t been heard from since Se
pt. 11, 2007. I am worried that there may be more going on here than simple disaffection from Bush’s immigration policy.
May 3, 2009 at 7:06 pm
[...] integration. It’s a hard knock life for professional conservatives these days – as we have previously observed – and getting called “foolish”, “innumerate”, or even “racist” [...]