Huh:
Remember how Tom Tancredo went on CNN last week and called Sonia Sotomayor a racist, accusing her falsely of being a member of a “Latino KKK”? Well, if racism so offends him, how does he explain this?
“On July 7, 2007, at approximately 7:15 p.m. at Jefferson and M Street, Northwest, in Washington, D.C., defendant was walking down the street making offensive remarks when he encountered the complainant, Ms. [REDACTED], who is African-American.The defendant uttered, “Nigger,” as he delivered a karate chop to Ms. [REDACTED]‘s head.”
That defendant is named Marcus Epstein–a former Tancredo speechwriter who now works as executive director of Tancredo’s political action committee.
Liberal fascists are no doubt spinning this story for political gain without conducting any deeper analysis. Let us not make this mistake. First consider these two facts, which put paid to the Democrats simple, politically-motivated narrative:
1. Democrats are the real racists.
2. Racism died with Barack Obama’s election.
After acknowledging these unquestionable facts, we are led to one, unmistakable conclusion: shortly before 1982, in order to evade ACORN, Richard Pryor replaced himself with an android duplicate, changed his name to “Marcus Epstein”, and went to work combating pedestrian racism through Republican political hackery and martial arts vigilantism. Strange as it may seem, no other conclusion is possible. For, as the great Sherlock Holmes observed: “whenever all other possibilities have been ruled out, the improbable, however unlikely, must be the truth”. And so dies another scurrilous Democrat smear campaign on the gleaming sword of Truth.
In an unrelated story, this is the Republican line of attack against Judge Sotomayor, which, I can’t help noticing, bears some striking similarities to the Republican line of attack against Barack Obama. Both of these people being, you know, not the sort of person who Sarah Palin would identify as Real Americans, ifyouknowwhatimsayin, andithinkperhapsyoudo. Now, it’s probably true that if Sotomayor’s views were a bit more in line with Alberto Gonzales’, she would be welcomed into the great Republican Real American melting pot, so perhaps we should consider it progress that these uncoded appeals to White Nationalism appear more opportunistic than sincere. Further consideration will probably not produce a more hopeful result, so let’s just stop here.
June 1, 2009 at 11:27 am
It’s interesting how this belies the racist underpinnings of the current conservative community.
One would think that Hispanics, by virtue of being a community that is largely practicing Christian and devoted to family, would be big favorites for fundies.
But, no. They’re brown.
June 1, 2009 at 11:31 am
Some deep thinkers trying to make sense of just who is (really!) racist.
June 1, 2009 at 11:41 am
And another thoughtful response to the liberal fascism we Good Americans face on a daily basis:
June 1, 2009 at 11:53 am
shortly before 1982, in order to evade ACORN, Richard Pryor replaced himself with an android duplicate, changed his name to “Marcus Epstein”, and went to work combating pedestrian racism through Republican political hackery and martial arts vigilantism.
Similarly, I think that Larry Kudlow is really a character portrayed by the late, great Phil Hartman. When God called Phil Hartman back to the great beyond, Phil went, but only under the condition that he be allowed to return to the realm of the living every so often in order to portray his greatest character — one that nobody even realized (and nobody realizes to this day) is merely part of an elaborate piece of performance art.
I mean, besides the physical resemblance, is it not obvious that Larry Kudlow is pretty much the same character as Bill McNeil and Lionel Hutz …
June 2, 2009 at 10:00 am
I believe this.
June 1, 2009 at 1:15 pm
The silence is deafening in regards to the Editors’ response to his Veep candidate Airwolf getting busted for sex with a perv. I shan’t be back.
June 1, 2009 at 1:18 pm
Yawn. Old news. When will Blue Thunder partisans stop firing off the same hateful lies and start dealing with the important helicopteric issues that the American people really care about? But I guess when you don’t have missiles, you fire off what you can.
June 1, 2009 at 4:12 pm
I deliver deadly dandruff warheads.
June 1, 2009 at 4:11 pm
“Further consideration will probably not produce a more hopeful result, so let’s just stop here.”
And you dare claim affiliation with liberal fascism.
Quitter.
A real liberal fascist would’ve at least included a nanabooboo.
June 1, 2009 at 5:40 pm
Just remember LIEberuls, Robert Byrd was a member of the KKK six decades ago and he’s a DEMONcrap, therefore Republicans can’t be racist.
June 2, 2009 at 10:00 am
Well that settles that.
June 2, 2009 at 10:04 am
No shit. I learned that from the YouTube comments section for the Young Conservatives Anthem video.
June 1, 2009 at 6:17 pm
Thanks for the Pryor. I needed that.
June 1, 2009 at 8:24 pm
My boy’s fave nickname for me is niggah. A word is just a word. The n-word won’t go away through censured disuse. It muct transform into something cool and groovy happy.
Like, “That’s a cute little Shetland nigger you got there.”
Or, “I respect niggars of all colors.”
A slave is still a slave, but we don;t associate them with the Slavis peoples anymore, do we? No. But we still use that word, ‘slave’.
We can kid ourselves all we want, though. It’s fun. Maybe 50 years from now, color will be sufficiently insignificant that lighter and darker-skinned people can joke comfortably about ‘I ain’t your niggar.’
For that matter, maybe some day Mongols won;t be a dirty word among Eurocaucasians.
And WASPS! Don’t get me started on them dirty muthafuckahs…
June 2, 2009 at 10:01 am
Careful with that Axe, Eugene.
June 1, 2009 at 9:12 pm
All words have depth and history, KL.
Sorry, but you won’t drain the poison out of it by ironizing, by going meta, or getting arch with it. Not in this lifetime. If this particular argument is a hobbyhorse of yours, you should maybe ride it in another pasture.
June 2, 2009 at 6:56 am
” Not in this lifetime. If this particular argument is a hobbyhorse of yours, you should maybe ride it in another pasture.”
I agree about the time frame, pr.
I used to volunteer at my son’s school with developmentally disabled children. One upon a time we call them (per their level of intelligence relative to the norm): idiots, morons, and imbeciles. But those names became epithets. Then we called them other words. None of these words lasted long as a neutral distinguisher. To call someone a retard, or retard’s newest replacement, “DI”, is never considered a kindness.
The point, oh gentle and righteous, pr (the initials seem to fit your particular brand of hobby-high horse), is that so long as we distinguish human from another on any basis, human mammalian nature will use these distinctions as a means to either exalt or denigrate one another. Overwhelmingly the latter, but there are exceptions.
Wingnuts surely love the names we call them. My mother qualifies as a wingnut: honky gal raised in Depression era South Carolina, converted with her family in her youth from Methodism to Mormonism, has her political beliefs wrapped around the Republican party like a wisteria vine around a totem pole.
I mean, you know, she’s a real *mutha*.
I think you should get off that wee pony of yours and place your feet on the ground, pr. Watch where you step, though, there’s bullshit all over the place. Folks like you and I put most of it there.
People like you gave asswipes like Rush Limbaugh the political traction they needed to galvanize a generation of impressionables into… well, you’ve seen the politics of the past 20 years.
When you and I have used the word *niggar* as often and as profitably as Richard Pryor did, in as many contexts, maybe then out renunciation of the term will have a bit more meaning. Depth and history, you know.
June 2, 2009 at 7:12 am
P.S. Bonus irony observation. As a teenager lazily dropping out of high school in Chicago, with black kids being bussed there every day, from the south side (just an historical note, a temporal reference for y’all), I recall we had a good many students who’d arrived in the USA after being born in the likes of Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia, Bulgaria, Greece, Romania…
We found ways to denigrate them (oh so slightly, with good American middle class good taste), based on their nationality.
We didn’t call them Slavs, though. We call them Vics, as in Slavic. Or sometimes ‘Stoshes’, since so many of the dudes’ 1st name was, or sound to our ears, ‘Stosh’.
We had no idea we were supposed to call them slaves per the ethnic epithet of a 1,000 years. Slave is not a kind word to call anyone these days, whatever color or background.
I used the words ‘cool and happy groovy’ in my post above, but that was just the optimist in me dancing with my ample insouciance. The real trick with such words is to expand their vile nature to an egalitarian level so that it’s just as insulting to call an albino Eskimo *niggar* as it is to call a native citizen of Chad a niggar.
Then everyone knows it’s a bad word, and we can use it with equal opportunity abandon like, say, the word for our favorite activity, sexual congress.
Why, someday, pr, the expression ‘sanctimonious reactionary liberal’ will be enjoyed as an insult persons of all level or moral arrogance, rational tendencies, and political stripe.
June 2, 2009 at 7:48 am
Such a long and carefully worded response deserves a thoughtful reply.
Nah…
June 2, 2009 at 8:35 am
An apophasis is typically the rhetorical tool of the self-defeated, but I salute you for at least refining it into one that admits what it is.
There is no argument to win or lose here. There is, however, the chance to show some deeper respect than is usually given to the likes of Richard Pyror who almost single-handedly provided a reflective foil for the world to see racism for what it is without aid of knuckle-dragging stereotypes like KKKers, who are simply its most nastily fragrant flower.
There are so many ways to express something like racism. The likes of Stokely Carmichael and Eldridge Cleaver, for example. One would be a fool to dismiss the valuable work they did in advancing Black Power, which was a powerful tool to elevate persons of socially disapproved color and hold The Establishment’s feet to the fire (remember The Establishment?) This does not excuse them, however, of the great insult they pinned on Ralph Ellison, who almost single-handedly raised Afro-American literature to a global pinnacle in English literature. (“Invisible Man” consistently vies w/Nabokov’s “Pale Fire” as #1 on 100 greatest English novel lists.)
Their insult? They regularly went out of their way to sneeringly call him an Uncle Tom because Ellison insisted on remaining above that fray and simply acting like a gentleman of refined stature, period. It hurt the man deeply that persons who, like himself, had suffered the abuses defined in the word *niggar* as most commonly used back in those days, would single him out as a toady for those persons most likely to use that epithet to degrade the likes of Ralph and Richard Pryor.
June 2, 2009 at 8:42 am
A fried of mine observed this post-thread and replied with the following:
“I am the only real liberal fascist in the world,Kenmeer. Only I am willing to put people into work camps for treading on the rights of others. Only I will force people in bureaucracy to make pyramids. Only I am willing to use death squads against the evils of the mundane.”
He uses an alloy of irony that I wish I could imitate but can only emulate.
June 2, 2009 at 8:45 am
Oh. mea culpa. The more precisely referential term is ‘paralipsis’ not “apophasis”.
June 4, 2009 at 2:46 pm
I thought apophasis was: ‘I will not enlarge upon Antony’s faults, far be it from me to extenuate his many adulteries, nor his public indecencies, nor shall I abuse your ears with sordid tales of his debaucheries, wherein capricious bloodletting and whippings of those helpless souls, the slaves of his victims, I say not ‘defeated rivals’, provided a welcome refinement to his supper — like an orchestra of wickedness, or a choir of savagery…’ That kind of thing.
June 2, 2009 at 10:04 am
What?
June 2, 2009 at 10:04 am
I thought I was bad…
June 2, 2009 at 10:04 am
I knew I was bad.
June 2, 2009 at 10:04 am
I’m still bad.
June 2, 2009 at 10:05 am
Uh, What?
June 2, 2009 at 10:07 am
Who’s bad?
June 2, 2009 at 11:07 am
http://www.bumwine.com/compare.html
June 2, 2009 at 2:33 pm
I’m a jailhouse “pruno” man mahseff.
That’s some *bad* shit, maynard.