Half the time Obama considers himself kind of lucky to be following George W. Bush’s opening act: it was such a profoundly colossal disaster of an administration on so many levels that all Obama has to do is not wreck the economy, start a catastrophic war of choice on false pretenses, let a treasured American city drown AND try to gut social security all at once and he should coast to re-election by landslide.
Seriously, if there’s one thing Pappy Bush can thank his no-good sociopathic son for its making Bush the Elder look like a half-way decent President in comparison. And sparking fond memories of the prior Bush presidency was no easy task. It took a special kind of overachiever of a fuck up.
But when Obama’s not chuckling about the ease of looking better than Bush, he’s lacing together a string of curses, that would make a liberal blogger blush, at the fact that Bush left him with such a cocked-up pile of gordian knot-tied crises to deal with from day 1 (or immediately after election night if you’re using the Malkin Calendar).
But at least Bush was friendly and his aides didn’t deface any of the White House keyboards, so it’s kind of a wash in terms of the hardships W faced after the Clinton transition.
Obama’s highly anticipated speech to the Middle East is a perfect example of this thanks/thanks-for-nothing dichotomy. First, have fun with Bush’s legacy Mr. President:
When President Obama delivers his address to the Middle East on Thursday from Cairo, he will face the legacy of names like Haditha, Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib, places that have become more symbol than geography over nearly a decade of perhaps the most traumatic chapter in America’s relationship with the Muslim world.
Yeah, that, and he has some splainin’ to do with the massive armies still malingering about in Iraq and Afghanistan, with the latter increasingly on the receiving end of our “liberation and freedom” from above – known, colloquially, as being bombed the shit out of. It sounds more grateful in the original Arabic/PashtoUrdu.
On the other hand, Obama will inherit a decent sized benefit of the doubt and be greeted by a population willing to at least listen with an open-ish mind if Barack can just continue not being George W. Bush incarnate. Which I think he can handle.
More than any other president in a generation, Obama enjoys a reservoir of goodwill in the region. His father was Muslim. His outreach in an interview with an Arabic satellite channel, a speech to Turkey’s parliament and an address to Iranians on the Persian New Year have inclined many to listen. Just as important, he is not George W. Bush.
As to the particulars of the speech, it’s a mixed bag. Peter Daou is right to criticize Obama for not addressing the Bush civil-liberties hangover head-on, and for taking a cautious approach when discussing human rights (especially women’s rights). On the other hand, cutting back on the lecturing tone was kind of a priority (hypocrisy doesn’t sell well – must be an Arab thing).
Also, he did make a loud declaration against torture and in support of closing Gitmo, and the applause from those lines was robust. Those are lines that no major Republican Party figure could even support, let alone utter. The emphasis on Islam’s connection to American culture and society was also a positive – if humdrum - theme.
But then, that just gets back to the low bar Bush set: closing Gitmo and ceasing torture (while maintaining indefinite detention and other civil liberties violations) is a marked improvement. Focusing on Islam’s valued place in America counts as fresh outreach. Hell, wingnuttia is so piss-pants frightened of Islam that merely saying thank you in Arabic is proofof secret fluency and hidden dhimmitude, so Obama can run laps around them with a simple smile and bow handshake.
And yet, after all, these are just words, even if Obama can make them sound prettier than Bush – also, coherent and part of the English language. Muslims, like Americans, will only be moved by rhetoric for so long. But it’s not a bad start.
Now pardon me while I go practice my ululating.
June 4, 2009 at 12:23 pm
my favorite part is that it’s considered bad if muslins like obama or america. so wait, they were grateful for the liberatin and whatnot but they should hate us? but wait, them hating us means that there’s gonna be more terrrrism. but but them likin us means that obama is a closet muslin and will sell us out to the muslins? i just can’t keep the tangled throw rug straight. i guess that’s what happens when belligerent empire-buildin arab-hatin USAUSA-ers say things though.
June 4, 2009 at 12:34 pm
Words are a form of action. Only words have the profound capacity to incite activity. What would the Civil Rights Movement be without words? Words uttered with the correct presentation are the most powerful human invention. You can start or stop any riot, and movement. Man’s an emotional creature, employing the right words moves emotion and invokes reason. The power of words in the wrong hands brings you Rwanda, (“Kill the cockroaches”), Hitler, etc., etc.
If only Airwolf had words…
PS
Thanks Eds for the Death Star. I cannot wait to use the right words to finally destroy that damn moon Endor. Fucking Ewoks! Get off of me!
June 4, 2009 at 12:43 pm
Sure, but all the pretty words won’t matter if our actions remain the same, or fundamentally the same if fixed up around the edges.
That’s my point. But like I said: It’s a good start.
June 4, 2009 at 12:52 pm
Agreed. You have to have the trust of the audience, only action that underscore your words, leading by example, will invoke the necessary trust and further compel progress. Obama is a great speaker, but if you look at history and what a few speakers or writers have willed the people to do, it’s pretty amazing. The relationship between speaker and audience is a dance.
foshizzle
June 4, 2009 at 1:14 pm
gives me hope, and I’m fairly cynical
June 4, 2009 at 2:10 pm
I’ll also go with the “words have power” bit. However, the power of those words can easily boomerang if the actions don’t match the words. That, truly is Obama’s burden. And given the U.S. media’s dick-sucking deference to this country’s extreme right, it’s going to be difficult for Obama to actually get much done to address the problems.
June 4, 2009 at 3:06 pm
“dick sucking deference” shall be inducted into the official vernacular henceforth.
June 4, 2009 at 3:33 pm
It was a speech not an action film.
June 4, 2009 at 3:52 pm
I’m actually kind of amazed the President Obama gets as much traction in Muslim countries as he does.
Apostasy being the highest sin in Islam, one would think the fact that he practices a faith other than that of his father would make him a villain in that part of the world.
June 4, 2009 at 4:30 pm
Thomas, Obama isn’t an apostate. There’s not a single mullah in the world that would try to make such an argument because there’s no foundation for it in the Qur’an. So far, the only argument FOR the idea has come from a single conservative pundit with zero education on Islamic jurisprudence writing an op-ed in the NYT.
June 4, 2009 at 4:42 pm
Dicks come in all colors and religions. We have Bush and Netanyahu, they have King Abdullah and Hosni Mubarak. Nobody smells like a rose.
But. We did go to Mecca and tell Osama bin Laden, et al, to kiss our collective ass. We got points for that.
June 4, 2009 at 5:04 pm
“Apostasy being the highest sin in Islam, one would think the fact that he practices a faith other than that of his father would make him a villain in that part of the world.”
Budget cuts. They out-sized it to the Catholics. who of course simply took the $$ and ran.
June 4, 2009 at 6:53 pm
Um, less than 5% of the population of Afghanistan speaks either of those languages.
Don’t know where I stand on the “words have power” issue, but I do know that when you go and use the distant huddled masses as a rhetorical bludgeon in your internet arguments, it’s a lot more effective when you take the 15 seconds to Google away your ignorance of an elementary characteristic of their culture like that.
(You were thinking of Pakistan, of course, but Urdu is the wrong pick there, too, if you’re trying to invoke the people in the increasingly bombed areas, or even people in oppressed peasant homelands generally.)
June 4, 2009 at 7:50 pm
Out-sourced, I meant.
June 5, 2009 at 6:54 am
Um, less than 5% of the population of Afghanistan speaks either of those languages.
But most Iraqis – which was the purpose of the reference to Arabic. Still, you’re right that I was a bit sloppy about the AF/Pak languages. I’ll correct.
but I do know that when you go and use the distant huddled masses as a rhetorical bludgeon in your internet arguments, it’s a lot more effective when you take the 15 seconds to Google away your ignorance of an elementary characteristic of their culture like that.
See, here’s the thing: You’re right that I should have done better google research, but, regardless, I don’t need to know shit about a given region’s culture to know that we shouldn’t be bombing the hell out of its people in some counterproductive, pointless endeavor.
Honestly.
Don’t need to know their language, what types of food they eat, clothing choices, music. None of that. Just: Let’s not incinerate them in their sleep.
It’s one size fits all.
June 5, 2009 at 7:08 pm
If you read closely, you’ll find I was critical not of the merit of your underlying argument, but of the effectiveness of the rhetorical device you used to advance it.
The replacement rhetoric is a definite improvement, but I think I would have preferred the original without the stumble to the culture-blind universal-humanist platitude you’ve patched it over with — I can almost hear your next sentence starting with the embarfenating “I don’t care if they’re black, white, green or purple…”
June 5, 2009 at 7:13 pm
No he didn’t it.
June 5, 2009 at 7:14 pm
It’s on now. After School behind the baseball field.
June 5, 2009 at 7:16 pm
You have to admit the post was still much better then the amazing blog you don’t write.
June 5, 2009 at 7:42 pm
You know the true mark of intelligence is your capacity for and sense of humor, otherwise isn’t it just the expression of some mild form of autism? People can memorize amazing quantities of data, words, formulas, but aren’t really smart. Now intelligence is your capacity to learn and wisdom is the knowledge attained? Can one be over educated? Isn’t education non-ending?
I don’t know what I’m asking. I read Monkey Attack and went to State.
Today I learned about Zebras.
What is the nature of our egos?
June 6, 2009 at 6:08 am
If you read closely, you’ll find I was critical not of the merit of your underlying argument, but of the effectiveness of the rhetorical device you used to advance it.
And if you read closely, I admitted my error, but noted that the rhetorical device is really secondary and less important. I doubt that this post failed to impact the reader because of Urdu rather than Pashto. That is, to the extent a blog post impacts readers regardless.
but I think I would have preferred the original
A thousand apologies. Here I am, spending my waking hours dreaming up ways to please you and, again, I have failed. Is there any bow or apology that would suffice?
Honestly, it’s one thing to pick a nit. It’s another to be a douchebag about it.
June 6, 2009 at 6:22 am
One more thought on “effectiveness”:
Can you really imagine someone reading this post and thinking, “Gee, he almost made me think twice about our policy of airstrikes in AF/Pak and Iraq, but then he was inaccurate about the particular regional dialect along the AF/Pak border region, and I was all like, ah, fuck it, let’s keep bombing.”
It’s better to be accurate. I should have gotten it right. But you make too much of “effectiveness.” On a blog.
June 5, 2009 at 7:59 am
So curv3ball is occasionally undereducated. That doesn’t make him, you know, an …….
June 5, 2009 at 8:43 am
I only read Monkey Attack Magazine. I don’t know what y’all are talking about. Is it about Mandrill’ seizing curios? No. Is it about a male squirrrel fatching himself a drink from your ladie cup? No. Is it about a Chimp named Danny recreating “Oh Starry Night” on the wall at your little girls 7th Birthday Party with someone elses feces? NO!
Please be more like Simian Assualt if you cannot raise your journalistic standards to Monkey Attack levels.
Yours,
Jeff Guck…Jeff Gannon
June 5, 2009 at 11:02 am
Land of the Lost marathon on Sci Fi today. TIVO set for awesome.
June 5, 2009 at 11:10 am
“’dick sucking deference’ shall be inducted into the official vernacular henceforth.”
One can only hope “Peter Daou is right” will be excised from the official vernacular with even greater dispatch.
June 5, 2009 at 11:18 am
One can only hope “Peter Daou is right” will be excised from the official vernacular with even greater dispatch.
At times, he is. At other times, not.
June 5, 2009 at 7:43 pm
The Editor of Monkey Attack is a New World Monkey named Chad.
June 6, 2009 at 12:11 pm
When I call a blog post “effective,” I have something in mind a bit broader than “mind changing” or even “convincing”.
I would also include notions like “not easily dismissed” and “difficult for the other side to mock” and “good enough to make me want to read the next post,” among others.
This is, again, a criticism only of style, but let’s face it, when you’re writing a blog, points for style are the only points you’re going to get.
PS- I would normally take a dig at the person deploying the old “just a blog” argument, curv3ball, but this time I’m sufficiently amused with the way it’s run over that embarrassing sycophant you’ve got following you around.
June 7, 2009 at 12:37 am
Well, I am insufficiently amused.
You are only mediocre at this, but keep working, and you can work your way up to mildly amusing, in an embarrassing way.
Now get back to work wit teh funni.
June 7, 2009 at 10:45 am
You forgot to call him “Grasshopper” and tell him that when he snatches the pebble from your hand, he may leave.
June 6, 2009 at 3:16 pm
But at least Bush was friendly and his aides didn’t deface any of the White House keyboards, so it’s kind of a wash in terms of the hardships W faced after the Clinton transition.
Bush & Co. were pretty stupid, but they did learn their lesson about defacing the White House for the next president when they had to clean up the mess in January, 2004.
June 6, 2009 at 3:16 pm
Are you a Bond Villain? Jesus Christ.
You have to illustrate that you yourself have produced work that isn’t
” “not easily dismissed” and “difficult for the other side to mock” and “good enough to make me want to read the next post,” among others.”"
Where is your amazing word craft exhibited?
Since we’re deploying advice, If you have something to say to someone specific, don’t be always such a little introverted sociopath and instead of passively aggressive douchery, confront them directly. If you want to go around correcting peoples work, produce some fucking work of your own that we can all see and go , “oh, OK he’s proved he’s an amazing writer he has some authority to tell me what is good or bad,” otherwise go eat cock. You don’t hold any real power over anyone else here, and that’s OK. If you want to extol advice learn how to communicate with humans. You don’t know how from what I see. Your therapist will tell you more.
Boitch.
June 6, 2009 at 3:24 pm
“A sycophant (from the Greek συκοφάντης sykophántēs) is a servile person who, acting in his or her own self-interest, attempts to win favor by flattering one or more influential persons, with an undertone that these actions are executed at the cost of his or her own personal pride, principles, and peer respect.”
Sounds like yourself. I’m not attempting to win anything, I just think you’re a talking penis. I really couldn’t care less about peerage and other antiquated forms of masturbation.
June 7, 2009 at 10:42 am
No more Snidley Whiplash?
June 6, 2009 at 3:25 pm
Er, January 2005 … pre-emptive anti-pedantry
June 6, 2009 at 3:34 pm
Pedant Was the mystery word. You’ve won a Ford Festiva.
Damn it, that’s three Festivas this month.
June 6, 2009 at 8:35 pm
Festivas – the piece of shit on wheels for the rest of us
June 6, 2009 at 8:57 pm
I know it’s not a LeCar, but…
June 9, 2009 at 11:57 am
to keep it really real, and resurrect an old thread, can we at least give George W Bush his well-earned 200 milliHitler award now?