You know, some things are actually worse than a slight increase in taxes for those whose cups runneth over:
On July 1, nearly 3 million Californians–mostly low-income parents, seniors, and people with disabilities–lost ten key benefits in their Medi-Cal coverage. The biggest concern is dental coverage, which over 900,000 of these patients use in a given year. Other benefits these patients lost include podiatry, optometry, psychology, and speech therapy.
All of these cuts are foolish: Dental coverage allows for better nutrition and prevents emergency room visits. Podiatry is an early warning signal for diabetes, etc. But these decisions don’t even meet the “penny-wise” cliché. In addition to being cuts to preventative care, the state is losing $1.60 in federal matching funds for every dollar we cut, impacting our health system, and our economy.
And while those cuts focus on all adults on California’s safety-net programs, the children have not been spared. Far from it. Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has proposed fully eliminating Healthy Families, California’s version of the state Child Health Insurance Program that covers nearly one million children.
Last Friday, July 17th, the board that runs Healthy Families closed enrollment, both to new applicants and even to those who are shifted from other state programs. Children on Medi-Cal coverage turning one or six-years-old in certain income categories will get a birthday gift of losing their health insurance. It is estimated that over 350,000 low-income children will be frozen out of health coverage and placed on a waiting list in the next year.
The news today is even worse: the cuts that legislative leaders just agreed to as an alternative to full elimination would force the program not just to impose a wait list, but also to actively dis-enroll hundreds of thousands more children from coverage. The consequences will be kids not getting glasses to see the blackboard, missing school for toothaches, and otherwise delaying care. One ailment or accident on the playground would put families at risk of financial ruin, and needed care will be delayed or avoided altogether. Children’s and other community groups don’t mince words when they say that cuts at this scale mean kids will die.
Naturally, it’s the party of Jesus – the champions of family values – that are leading the charge to kick poor kids off the health care rolls rather than raise taxes on the uber-wealthy/others. Perhaps we need another symposium on how God-less Democrats can better connect to faith voters. Is Amy Sullivan available?
Greed sure is a bitch though. It’s as if the California GOP/voters are in a plane going down, and each would rather grasp their bag of gold than grab a parachute. Or rather, they’d use a parachute for themselves and then use one for their gold rather than give it to a poor kid.
Like Jesus would do.
UPDATE: And of course, while a blind eye is turned to the real-world consequences for actual people, the shrieking is reserved for alternate-reality health care whereby Obama euthanizes your grandmama. We’re doomed.
July 22, 2009 at 8:59 am
“they’d use a parachute for themselves and then use one for their gold rather than give it to a poor kid. ”
Of course. The gold is capital to create jobs and grow the economy: of what use is a child, especially a poor one?
July 22, 2009 at 9:00 am
true
July 22, 2009 at 9:08 am
The Republican rubric tells us that life begins at conception, and Republican actions demonstrate that their concern for life ends at birth.
Well, that’s not really true. Republicans are concerned about the unborn only to the extent that the little fetuses don’t use any state resources. So, no prenatal care, no healthcare for the mother during pregnancy, no nutrition assistance to ensure proper fetal development.
Happily, though, the mainstream media will gleefully depict the unfolding human disaster as the righteous outcome of Arnold sticking to his principles. Only such strong and determined leadership can produce such magnificent outcomes as turning California into a Randian paradise!
July 22, 2009 at 9:52 am
It’s time, bitches. The California constitution, a document designed with the noble goal of thwarting the power of the railroad trusts in the mid-1800s, has become a suicide pact in the early 2000s. I, for one, refuse to go down with the ship:
http://www.repaircalifornia.org/
(Could a new constitution be worse than the status quo? This being California I can’t rule out the possibility, but damn would they ever have to work at it…)
July 22, 2009 at 11:14 am
Fuuuuuuck……
I too will vote for this constitutional convention. I too want to do away with the proposition system, and the 2/3rds requirement, and Prop 13, and shit on Howard Jarvis’s grave while we’re at it.
But I have little faith that this will pass. Once the convention is called, every group in sight will want to keep their protections. And once the new constitution is drafted, every mini-Rush will scream and every wingnut will vote it down. This is also a state where people like Kevin James have a platform.
Fuuuuuck.
July 22, 2009 at 3:10 pm
Well, in theory they’re working on provisions to prevent that. Delegates will be selected randomly from voter registration rolls, which should at least in theory make it harder to game the system by stacking it with insane people.
…instead it will merely have the same proportional representation of insane people as the CA population at large. So we may just be doomed.
July 22, 2009 at 3:47 pm
“make it harder to game the system by stacking it with insane people.”
Democratic reform in a nut’s hell?
July 22, 2009 at 8:42 pm
I’d have to read these proposals carefully, but I like the cut of your jib.
July 22, 2009 at 11:51 am
Here’s a couple of things I thought we could have done that were reasonable enough:
A $15 yearly vehicle license fee to fund the state parks (they then would’ve been free to residents): http://laist.com/2009/06/16/saving_state_parks_15_vehicle_fee_c.php
A severance tax on oil drilling: http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-hiltzik15-2009jun15,0,679458.column. We’re going to allow them to drill for it off the coast now, why the hell not tax them?
Instead we are bankrupting everything, including our counties. As an Oakland resident, I’m super excited about that.
F U republicans and and rural idiots that sent you to Sacto!
July 22, 2009 at 8:43 pm
Word.
July 22, 2009 at 11:57 am
“Perhaps we need another symposium on how God-less Democrats can better connect to faith voters. Is Amy Sullivan available?”
Awesome, more Amy Sullivan bashing.
You’re right, she was trying to enable the theocracy, not help Democrats win elections. What a bitch.
July 22, 2009 at 1:43 pm
Not my point at all kevin. I wasn’t accusing her of holding nefarious theocratic goals, just misguided ones.
The focus on God-less Democrats and faith-based Republicans is in itself a giant bag of bollix – considering how utterly compassionless the so-called Jesus-loving Republicans are. And how compassionate the Godless Democrats tend to be (or at least, when the moderates and sell outs aren’t fucking it all up).
I’d rather re-frame the whole discussion. We should be asking the so-called faith-based to reacquaint themselves with Jesus – and to figure out ways to reach out to fellow Americans in ways that are understanding and persuasive, not combative and hate-filled.
Jesus was neither preoccupied with Teh Ghey, hung up on sex nor worried about abortion, but he was focused quite intently on issues of wealth inequality and poverty. Maybe the faith-based voters should, you know, try reaching out to people along those lines.
In other words: they need the fucking symposium to examine their Godlessness, not the Democrats. Going to church doesn’t necessarily bring you closer to God. Or whatever it is you’re hunting. It’d be nice if we could start recognizing hypocrisy and false piety for what it is.
July 22, 2009 at 8:45 pm
There are reachable voters who can be persuaded, and there are unpersuadable voters who I often tell to it large bags of cock. They need to be informed.
http://mikesamerica.blogspot.com
July 23, 2009 at 9:17 am
Alright, my bad.
I read into your comment the hyperventilating about AS over at Washington Monthly, but it looks like we’re on the same page.
FWIW, I see AS as helping that cause, but your mileage may vary.
July 22, 2009 at 3:07 pm
She’s a one-note nooge. If curv doesn’t want to slam Sullivan, I will. She wants more Democrats to win elections so long as they hold her mush-headed, idiot-lite version of Republican sanctimony. Her articles are trite, her evidence scant and her premise moronic.
She harps over a Democratic party that only — and I mean ONLY exists — in Republican talking points. Most, the overwhelming number, of Democrats are at least believers. Most go to church. ALL Democratic candidates are openly religious and have to be.
None of this is sufficient to Sullivan. She, instead, lives for Republicans to claim that Democrats are irreligious. And then scolds Democrats for, well, what Republicans say about them.
On unions, on health care, on the social contract, on wars, she’s silent. If she gave a shit about Democrats winning elections — things she might have noticed over the past four years of Democratic victories — approximately NONE of it has to do with bowing down to religions or the trapping of spirituality. It had to do with BEING Democrats.
In short, her one-note critique was off. And proven so. But at least her heart was in the right place, the poor dear.
July 23, 2009 at 11:56 am
“She harps over a Democratic party that only — and I mean ONLY exists — in Republican talking points.”
And those talking points dominate the media coverage. As long as that perception — a misperception, as you note — is dominating, then she’s right to push back against it.
July 24, 2009 at 8:18 am
Why? To come across as insincere and pandering? Sullivan’s entire premise beyond general moralizing is that the voters DEMAND to be patronized. Why if the Democrats don’t give lip service to religion they’re DOOMED!
Which, again, has proven false over the past three election cycles.
What they needed to do, and will continue to need to do, is be a governing party that takes governing seriously.
When you win elections it seems stupid to push back against perceptions that haven’t really hurt you as much as submission to Republican politics has.
July 22, 2009 at 12:48 pm
Remember when Gray Davis was Gov? Good Times
July 22, 2009 at 3:51 pm
I predict yet another Epic Fail for Reps… and Blown Dawg Dems.
Pissing into the wind during a vertically blowing shitstorm is hardly my idea of reforming your party into what the people need (and what they NEED, they tend to *want*).
July 22, 2009 at 5:01 pm
Good point. However, I fear that it might take another election cycle. The conservo-moderates may succeed in derailing health care reform and as a result find themselves in an even smaller minority come 2011. Which might actually be a good thing in the long run, except I’m not getting any younger.
July 23, 2009 at 8:57 am
Is true but then, we’ve got a helluva hole to dig out ‘tween Clinton/Gingrich and Dubya/muppets from hell.
What I see happeing is Obama’s poll stats don’t drop a whole lot, and his command of the bully pulpit grows as the yappie dogs of COngress nip his heels to prove they’re anything but yappy little dogs.
I foresee Obama doing an FDR on the fuckers as ongoing events prove him a) a leader who b) stays on target of the goals he ran on.
Right now, the whiny left can only dink him for not aggressively pursuing criminal charges on Cheney and for not immediately relinquishing the kingly powers that Dubya and predecessors endowed the executive office. But, I say, give that one time, and especially consider how the steadily accumulating evidence of malfeasance against those creeps sets that issue up to catch fire when it does, at which point Obama can ride that one for a touchdown while maintaining his position of Help the People 1st, and smack the gad guy’s peepees second.
Revenge is for suckers, so save it for when things really suck and folks need a reason to believe.
Delaying health care in any way is political suicide for the yappers. 50 million uninsured Americans and those wtih insurance (like me) on the verge of bankruptcy due to bad health striking three of four members of my family: HHT; CRPS, mystery malady creating pain even worse than CRPS in the CPRS afflicted member, probably a side effect o bad followup from very delicate surgery involving implantation of neurostim wiring into the spine to shut down the CRPS; severe arthritic pain following vertebral fusion surgery and a shoulder repair…
And my family is hardly uniwue, eh?
Politics is patience, and waiting for that one really good pitch.
July 22, 2009 at 4:45 pm
We ought to be at a place in history where the crazy people would begin to have a bit less control over our lives — no, a fucking lot less control. (So why do the crazy people continue to shit in our collective bed? I blame the media, who for some reason hold on to the belief that the crazy people are the real Amerkins, who always decide the outcome of our biannual Horse Race to control the DC social calendar. Recent history has never been their long suit, except of course when Republican are in control.)
But apparently we’re not. So, yes, we are doomed.
July 22, 2009 at 5:03 pm
oops, make that “semi-annual.”
July 22, 2009 at 5:22 pm
Well what if I take all of my gold and invest it in a factory for turning all of the poor kids who didn’t survive the plane crash into cat food, and what if those cats catch rats in poor neighborhoods, and those rats don’t bite poor kids and kill them from infectious diseases, and then I get on another plane with those poor kids and it crashes and I repeat the process allowing me to help even more people – who then, I ask you, who then will be the greatest living benefactor the human race has ever known if not I?
July 22, 2009 at 5:28 pm
also it is the fault of the poor kids’ parents for squandering their twinkie and cheesewhiz money on airplane tickets, causing the poor kids to die of starving to death on a crashing airplane.
And who are the parents of the poor kids? A poor woman, and a poor man. Hence this is the fault of the Poor Man.
If I wasn’t busy churning his kids to cat food this very moment, cat food which he will no doubt feed to his cats in a singularly heartless liberal fascist manner, and then post pictures of his kid-sated cats without amusing loltext beneath, I’d say that Al Gore was fat and maybe it wasn’t the cats that ate the poor man’s kids, maybe it was Al Gore, and if Al Gore did it, Clinton did it too. And if Clinton does it, Obama isn’t even from this country. Think about it, retards.
July 22, 2009 at 6:33 pm
impressive fu
July 22, 2009 at 8:38 pm
Working poor people don’t need glasses to drive their cadillacs Der!
If I saw Arnold, and I know I would get my ass kicked, but I might just have to smack him.
July 22, 2009 at 8:49 pm
try.
July 22, 2009 at 8:49 pm
With verbal aplomb.
July 23, 2009 at 9:00 am
Arnold is slow and half-crippled, and his bodyguards hate him.
July 23, 2009 at 12:07 pm
may be half crippled, but he’s got one bigassed knife.
July 23, 2009 at 1:34 pm
Bring a lightsaber, make Crocodile Dundee disparaging remarks about his knife, and use your blaster.
July 23, 2009 at 8:17 am
California has a $26.3 Billion budget deficit and has issued over $470 million in IOUs. Why is it shocking that many of the cuts will be hurtful? If your a Californian, make the tough choices and direct the cuts.
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1910985,00.html
July 23, 2009 at 8:37 am
What is shocking is that tax increases are completely off the table, not that some cuts are necessary.
July 23, 2009 at 3:23 pm
From the linked article:
“Having raised taxes by $12.8 billion in February, the governor balked at a second hike.” There was a series of initial tax increases. Maybe more is warrented, maybe its time for cuts, but there was a rather large increase.
July 23, 2009 at 6:13 pm
The legislature as the most democratic body should be able to decide the budget, but with the insane Cali budget rules, the prop system, and the Governor thrusting his junk in the face of the members, this is what you get.
July 23, 2009 at 6:33 pm
The Turducken Arises From the Ashes:
“While Bush has retired to Texas to write his memoirs and secure his legacy by other means, Cheney is settling in for a long siege in Washington, where he will soon be installed in a conservative think tank and where, Republicans say, he will pull levers on Capitol Hill to make his voice heard.”
News copy writers usually seem mighty dense, but somehow I think this one knew exactly what innuendo he was implying.
July 24, 2009 at 11:32 am
“As ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have made me happy bitches! F**k the poor!!”
Mathew 25:40, The Holy Bible, New Republican Edition
July 24, 2009 at 3:48 pm
Can’t California just write more IOU’s to pay for this? I don’t understand…
“I will gladly pay you Tuesday, for some free healthcare today…” Gospel according to Wimpy, 13:3.
I paraphrase, but I think someone once said; “The poor you will always have with you…” I always understood this to refer to people like me; no matter how much money I make, or is given to me, I will always spend it all, leaving me with nothing, i.e. penniless (or poor if you will.) Still, that doesn’t mean I’m standing on the corner with hat in hand (or handicapped, if you will…)
If you do not work, you should not expect to eat…
July 24, 2009 at 5:54 pm
A friend of mine wrote this to me:
“Says you: ‘There are foreign interests equally evil and committed to American corruption.’
“Equally evil, certainly. Committed to American corruption, I suppose. But if anyone outside America is as capable of America’s destruction and as dedicated to exactly that as the Republican Party’s leadership, you’d need to tell me whom you’re referring to, because I don’t see it. There are countries like China that hold enormous power over America’s economy, but that’s not evil, it’s just business. America hasn’t had an enemy worth fearing for its dedication and determination to destroying America since the Soviet Union collapsed, except for the Republican Party.”
Sadly, I believe this my friend is correct. Nixon killed the GOP.
July 24, 2009 at 5:58 pm
“If you do not work, you should not expect to eat…”
That is both too moral, too assumptive and, alas, somewhat meaningless. Not nice of me to say that, I know, but “work” is a hugely broad term, and expecting to eat or not is an acto f prophecy, not cause and effect.
I would say: if you ain’t got food, and don;t gitchyoo some, you;re gonna be hungry.
That is truth. all this work ethic and social contract talk is so much conclusion without negotiation.
July 24, 2009 at 6:16 pm
By that logic the whole Congress would go hungry and half of people who make $250,000/yr off the work of others. I guess we should mandate daily physical labor, comrade.
July 24, 2009 at 6:47 pm
“If you do not work, you should not expect to eat…”
That’s what I keep telling my cats, but they won’t listen.
July 24, 2009 at 9:21 pm
Put simply, as an old friend said:
“You don’t get what you pay for; you get what you get.”
July 24, 2009 at 8:26 pm
July 24, 2009 at 9:38 pm
Groovy, baby.
July 25, 2009 at 2:09 pm
Kinks’ song Americana, lyrics describing the experience that got them “banned” (actually de-listed) in the U.S.:
America, the land of the free, the home of the brave
That’s what I thought before I toured there
You see, I’ve got myself being seduced by the sheer Americana of it all
And I’d seen their images on television
Of Lee Harvey Oswald, John F. Kennedy’s assassination
And I thought “America is a violent place”
And America is keen to trap you
Like you had giant tentacles that wrapped themselves around you
Until you couldn’t move and you were trapped
The land of the free, the home of the brave, guns and the Wild West
Hey big fat cowboy, wearing your big Stetson
Hey big fat cowboy, flashing your big six gun
Hey big fat cowboy, singing country & western
Hey big fat cowboy, is this the way that the West was won? Yeah
I found myself in the back of a big Ford Thunderbird
With a slick-looking dude
He looked like a punk from a B-movie,
The sort of punk that would piss everybody off
Until Lee Marvin put a bullet through his brain
The punk looked over at me
“Kinks? What kind of a motherfuckin’ name is that?”
Then he reached over and picked up the car telephone
“Hey kid, I’ve got Elvis Presley’s phone number.
I’ve got Ann-Margret’s phone number. I’ve fucked Ann-Margret!”
I knew Mick Avory would be impressed with this, but I was not
And then the punk looked over at me
“I’ll dial Elvis Presley” He dialed a number
“Hey, is that you Elvis? I wanna speak to the Colonel.
Jump to it, you mother!”
And then he looked over at me in a menacing way,
Reached into the glove-compartment and took out a revolver
He waved the six gun around, menacingly
“You see kid, when I deal with people, they have to treat me right,
Otherwise they contend with this! A gun!
Have you ever seen a gun before?”
I hadn’t
Then he waved it around, put it back in the glove-compartment
“Welcome to Peoria, Illinois, home of Middle America,
Ice-cream and apple pie, guns and the Wild West”
All American wise guy, why achieve that gleam in the sun
Hamburger and a milkshake, all American dude
Popcorn and a t-bone, hot dog with a big smile
And a bad attitude, yeah yeah yeah
Flying across America on a TWA, flying to California
To appear on television, performing our new record Set me free
The Kinks were met by a union man with a contract to sign
And The Kinks didn’t like signing contracts
“Hey, are you The Kinks? Sign this piece of paper guys!
I want you to sign this union-document so you can appear on television”
“No thanks mate, we don’t wanna sign a contract”
“You have to sign, otherwise you cannot appear”
“We don’t want to sign a piece of paper, alright!”
“Listen kid, you sign the piece of paper.
You with your red hunting jackets and your yellow frilly shirts.
Sign the piece of paper!”
“Do you wanna sign it?” He looked over at Dave
“Watcha gonna do kid?” “Fuck off!”
Which is a fairly reasonable thing to say in the circumstances,
But not very wise, you see, the man was a union executive
“Alright. Once I file my report on you guys
You’re never gonna work in America again.
You’re gonna find out just how powerful it is in America!”
The land of ice-cream and apple pie, guns and the Wild West
Great American union rules with the fist, a smile and a gun
Great American napalm lights up the sky like the sun
Great American eagle swoops down from the sky up above
And I remember the images of Lee Harvey Oswald
Appearing on TV saying he was a patsy
A union man is a-framin’ The Kinks
While I thought “This is the land of opportunity”
But the Cosa Nostra are everywhere
Land of ice-cream and apple pie
Hey big fat cowboy, wearing that big six gun
Hey big fat cowboy, singing country & western
Hey big fat cowboy, moving that big six gun
Hey big fat cowboy, is this the way that the West was won?
Yeah yeah yeah
And 6 weeks later Robert and Grenville and Larry
Were sitting in their office in Carnaby Street
And the letter came from the American government
It was from the American Federation of Musicians Union
“A band known as The Kinks,
The English beat group known as The Kinks,
Are banned from America.
Their license to perform has been revoked indefinitely”
Yeah, all the same fuck off
In the land of the ice-cream and apple pie, guns and the Wild West
July 25, 2009 at 9:24 pm
Not to toot my own horn, but, although I always loved Sunny Afternoon as a pop song, I never before realized how fucking brilliant the lyrics are. (And this prehistoric “video”.)
July 26, 2009 at 8:52 pm
Most of what Ray wrote from 1967 to 1971 is great.
July 27, 2009 at 10:46 am
Most of what Ray wrote from 1967 to 1971 is great.
Seriously.
July 24, 2009 at 11:55 pm
And another thing, ridiculous requires a foolish response?
Or shall I state logic? Can I state logic?
Ridiculous meanderings require a ridiculous response? I agree.
John Lennon knew the spaztastic results of fools who listened to his music.
Thus we have folks who follow him to the grave…
–yEAH, i’hm a dumbkoph…
July 24, 2009 at 11:58 pm
I clap with one hand, do y0u hear it? It is us clapping unanimously(SP) what did I miss
‘
?
\\\\
Wow I am too drunk.stupiid to respnd. I shall pee moderated ah guess!@
July 25, 2009 at 9:26 pm
Dude, there’s no moderator on duty, as far as I can tell.
July 25, 2009 at 11:02 pm
Ah, Kinks. Ah, empire
Pe-o-ria!