I got it horribly wrong: I didn’t understand the question, and I thought about it the wrong way, and now that I know the answer I don’t understand it. I think I got out of this stuff just in time. Here, in short, is a fair summary of my illustrious science career:
1. There’s a bunch of equations. Memorize which equations go with what situation. Plan Nobel speech.
2. Take test, applying equations to appropriate situations. Do symbolic manipulation as appropriate. When in doubt, remember that the answer is always either 0 or -pi/2. Daydream about winning the Nobel Prize for discovering that the answer to all questions about the physical universe is always either 0 or -pi/2.
3. (Optional) At some point, months or years later, apropos of nothing, suddenly realize Oh! That’s why stress (say) is a tensor (for example)! It’s actually rather simple, and it couldn’t really be any other way, could it? Finish flossing your teeth.
4. (Mandatory) To the extent that you ever “got it” conceptually, stop getting it. If you must, you can remember tiny, orphan fragments of it. Example: Thermodynamics, huh? Well, as I remember, it turns out that temperature is the slope of the derivative of, like, the partition function? Entropy? Well, something you wouldn’t expect anyway. Yup, I surely learned a lot of useful shit in college. Tell yourself you just forgot “the equations,” as if that were like forgetting to say “What is …” before answering on Jeopardy. Wonder if anybody has ever looked for a possible connection between flossing and amnesia.
5. (Projected) Win back-to-back-to-back NBA slam dunk crowns. Go to LHC, wait for someone to walk in carrying a Nobel prize. Grab it, dunk it right in their face. MY HOUSE, POINDEXTER!
Anyway, my point is that back in my day we had it tough because we didn’t have stuff like this. You could probably skip right to step 3 with that.
February 3, 2010 at 6:59 pm
Margaret Carlson.
QED.
February 3, 2010 at 7:34 pm
Oh dear Jesus. Those who cannot do, teach. Those who cannot tie their shoes write articles about how to teach.
February 3, 2010 at 8:08 pm
That was some funny shit.
This is:
A) the “older” twin
B) a demonstration of how the Lorenz contraction counteracts face lifts
C) compelling visual reason for why you *don’t* want to know which twin is older
D) y = so/sad?
February 3, 2010 at 8:09 pm
(seriousness alert) What peorgie said and then some.
February 3, 2010 at 10:39 pm
Title “This is why I’m not a famous genius”
That’s where you’re wrong sucka.
You are a famous genius.
OK so you can dunk over a 7 footer and you answered the problem wrong.
However, even working together, LeBron James and Alber Einstein would never have thought to type “(for example)! ” (for example)!
See it’s easy now that you’ve shown us the way (by example) !
February 3, 2010 at 11:15 pm
February 4, 2010 at 1:40 am
You are God.
February 4, 2010 at 2:41 am
I know, no wonder I have so many haters.
February 4, 2010 at 8:28 am
Well, that Old testament Goth phase you went through didn’t help. Not to mention the Brooks brothers button-down eye row. And it wouldn’t hurt if you cleaned your tusks one a millennium.
As for the brain pompadour: smokin’!
February 3, 2010 at 11:20 pm
I’m the same way. I’m a genius is a spherical, frictionless universe.
February 4, 2010 at 2:53 am
I just wish I’d known that the Bible says pi=3 at the time I was doing this stuff in college. Talk about simplifying a few things.
February 4, 2010 at 7:10 am
Wait. are they supposed to keep the same ‘distance’ L, or the same ‘time differential between them i.e. T = L/c?
Because who’s ever in fron is gonna have to slow down some to maintain this ‘T’, and I suspect will be older.
February 4, 2010 at 7:25 am
and isn’t the derivative of the ln of the partition function with respect to temp equal to the entropy, divided by the gas constant?
February 4, 2010 at 8:37 am
I dunno. But something is the derivative of some other thing, I’m quite sure of that. And it’s pretty cool.
February 4, 2010 at 8:13 am
For the record, I’m pretty sure that’s the best dunk ever. And as a Knick fan, it has a little extra sting as that’s the douche we drafted instead of Ron Artest and others.
Also, I’m pretty sure that dunk made up his mind not to come to the NBA.
February 4, 2010 at 8:06 pm
Kléber Loves the Knickerbockers. Despite what John Starks did to us…
February 4, 2010 at 2:11 pm
The suck my balls dunk is a good one. But as you may have already come to understand, I prefer named dunks as the preferred pathway towards a Nobel Prize. This theory also applies to the LHC created earth sucking black hole. The guy who names the object best, shall win the Nobel regardless of which twin got there first.
February 4, 2010 at 2:41 pm
Oh my … friggin Jeebus and Carol Channing …
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/only-empathy-can-save-us_b_447685.html
February 4, 2010 at 5:23 pm
I think only enthalpy can save us.
February 5, 2010 at 7:04 am
rimshot.
What is UP with these punk-ass looking avatars?
February 6, 2010 at 7:11 pm
[...] it takes information longer to reach Conservatopia, due to gravity or whatnot. I could never get my head around that stuff. [...]