Very interesting:
LIVERMORE, Calif. — The first experiments at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory’s National Ignition Facility (NIF) have demonstrated a unique physics effect that bodes well for NIF’s success in generating a self-sustaining nuclear fusion reaction.
In inertial confinement fusion (ICF) experiments on NIF, the energy of 192 powerful laser beams is fired into a pencil-eraser-sized cylinder called a hohlraum, which contains a tiny spherical target filled with deuterium and tritium, two isotopes of hydrogen. Rocket-like compression of the fuel capsule forces the hydrogen nuclei to combine, or fuse, releasing many times more energy than the laser energy that was required to spark the reaction. [...]
The experiments, described in an article in today’s edition of Science Express, the online version of the journal Science, resulted in highly symmetrical compression of simulated fuel capsules – a requirement for NIF to achieve its goal of fusion ignition and energy gain when ignition experiments begin later this year.
This has been an unusually controversial project – I can’t think of another project where the lead scientist is called a “snake oil salesman” in public. And I’m still waiting for a press release that reads “we just realized this is never going to work, but we’re funded through the year, so suck it.” And, even if it does work, we would still be a long way from commercial application. But fusion is the only technology I can think of that could solve so many of our environmental and energy problems in an unambiguous way. Hydrogen is not a limited resource, and helium is about as harmless as a substance as exists, if you don’t mind talking like a chipmunk.
February 6, 2010 at 3:22 pm
Lucky for us that we have a naturally-occurring fusion reaction passing overhead in the sky each day.
February 6, 2010 at 3:23 pm
While large-scale centralized power production is important, I hold more hope from severely increased energy utilization efficiency and the composite effectives of tech like this:
WIndbelt
February 6, 2010 at 4:05 pm
I’m still waiting for Mr. Fusion, like in “Back to the Future.” Dump some coffee grounds and half-eaten broccoli stems in and away you go!
February 6, 2010 at 4:28 pm
This is roughly the same path that M.I.T. explored back in the 1990s with TOKAMAK. Then, as today, the really big hurdle is containing a sustained fusion reaction. M.I.T. sought to do it with magnetic bottles, which kinda-sorta worked.
But fusion reactors are not the amazing clean energy they seem to be. The reaction throws off all kinds of deadly radiation, and leaves the containment vessel just as radioactive as a standard fission reactor. Still, it’s worth pursuing because we just might figure it out some day.
OTOH, some of us are old enough to remember “Power too cheap to meter” being promised as part of the new and wonderful Atomic Age.
February 6, 2010 at 4:44 pm
fusion is the only technology I can think of that could solve so many of our environmental and energy problems in an unambiguous way.
An even better technology with which to solve many of our environmental and energy problems in an unambiguous way is birth control.
As a species, we’re in need of some restraint.
February 6, 2010 at 4:57 pm
Energy really isn’t the problem.
We’re just burning fossil fuels now only because that’s what all the rich people are selling us.
My favorite energy utopia is the island of Maui. Great insolation. A natural wind tunnel on the trade winds that is so strong it breaks the windmills.
Tons of rainwater on the rainy side (micro-hydroelectric).
And geothermal is still accessible.
Yet the island still gets all its energy from oil tankers.
The sitation is quite humorous.
February 6, 2010 at 5:07 pm
Don’t worry, conservatives and/or fucking hippies will figure out a way to make it ambiguous as hell.
February 6, 2010 at 5:13 pm
Egad! Communists have taken over the FDA.
February 6, 2010 at 5:20 pm
You know, peorgie, you’re the only poster who got a fair shake on these lame-o new Orwellian avatars.
February 6, 2010 at 6:14 pm
Yeah, it ain’t bad, is it.
February 6, 2010 at 5:25 pm
Mr. William Neumann of the NYTImes, who stars in the infovideo in the FDA article peorgie linked, really really really scares me. Grown, semi-balding, white collar upscale men do NOT wear their hair like that anymore. Not since the late 80s or so?
He’s like a yuppie version of trailer trash. Or is he supposed to appear *ironically* as a bedraggled neo-postal chemistry teacher in a Rust Belt town that can only afford Fizzies and water balloons as lab equipment?
February 6, 2010 at 5:54 pm
Did you see this?
February 6, 2010 at 6:22 pm
Holy fuck. That shit sounds dangerous. And in the hands of the Germans?
Seriously though, if you made a few cubic kilometers of it, it could not possibly be a good thing.
February 10, 2010 at 5:07 pm
Pretty sure Gothenburg is in Sweden.
February 6, 2010 at 8:14 pm
One of my favorite moments in “Mars Attacks” was when the army of Earth fired a hydrogen bomb at the aliens and the Martians capture the explosion in a balloon, then bring it to their ship so that their leader can inhale it and talk in a funny high-pitched voice.
It was by far the nerdiest example of “its funny because its true” that I’d ever seen in a movie.
February 6, 2010 at 11:37 pm
That is interesting.
February 7, 2010 at 10:19 am
“…a material whose density is significantly greater than the material in the core of the Sun.”
“Well, that material was on display this weekend, on both the stage and in the audience, at the first national Teabaggers Convention in Nashville, Tennessee. Keynoter Sarah Palin set the tone of ultra-density when she,” etc.
February 7, 2010 at 2:26 pm
And people say she lacks substance.
February 9, 2010 at 1:02 pm
” The reaction throws off all kinds of deadly radiation, and leaves the containment vessel just as radioactive as a standard fission reactor”
Yet as nasty as it is, it’s easier to contain than CO2, which just floats the hell away.
February 9, 2010 at 5:25 pm
Every DoD contractor could make this statement about its latest gee-whiz toy.
February 9, 2010 at 10:03 pm
“containment vessel just as radioactive as a standard fission reactor.”
There’s some Boron reaction or other that doesn’t give off any neutrons, but IIRC, it was even further from being energy-positive, and the fuel was more expensive.