[H]ere’s what Newt Gingrich, the Republican former speaker of the House — a man celebrated by many in his party as an intellectual leader — had to say: If Democrats pass health reform, “They will have destroyed their party much as Lyndon Johnson shattered the Democratic Party for 40 years” by passing civil rights legislation.
His Editor:
This column quotes Newt Gingrich as saying that “Lyndon Johnson shattered the Democratic Party for 40 years” by passing civil rights legislation, a quotation that originally appeared in The Washington Post. After this column was published, The Post reported that Mr. Gingrich said his comment referred to Johnson’s Great Society policies, not to the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
The Great Society rests on abundance and liberty for all. It demands an end to poverty and racial injustice, to which we are totally committed in our time.
Three seconds on Google:
Historian Alan Brinkley has suggested that the most important domestic achievement of the Great Society may have been its success in translating some of the demands of the civil rights movement into law.[5] Four civil rights acts were passed, including three laws in the first two years of Johnson’s presidency. The Civil Rights Act of 1964[3] forbade job discrimination and the segregation of public accommodations. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 assured minority registration and voting. It suspended use of literacy or other voter-qualification tests that had sometimes served to keep African-Americans off voting lists and provided for federal court lawsuits to stop discriminatory poll taxes. It also reinforced the Civil Rights Act of 1964[3] by authorizing the appointment of federal voting examiners in areas that did not meet voter-participation requirements. The Immigration and Nationality Services Act of 1965 abolished the national-origin quotas in immigration law. The Civil Rights Act of 1968 banned housing discrimination and extended constitutional protections to Native Americans on reservations.
Newt Gingrich is considered “an intellectual leader” because he was a professor of History, of all things.
March 22, 2010 at 8:54 pm
Right, Newt, that was the real reason for the angry white, South-centered backlash: Head Start and Medicare.
March 23, 2010 at 3:35 am
Lemme get this straight – Little Lord Gingrich has the power to make the NYT issue a correction to an accurate citation on the grounds that he’d like to change what he said?
March 23, 2010 at 3:55 am
[...] (as evident by the quote below) but he’s just plain wrong on the history — a subject The Editors point out he got paid to teach. Krugman: [H]ere’s what Newt Gingrich, the Republican [...]
March 23, 2010 at 3:57 am
[...] (as evident by the quote below) but he’s just plain wrong on the history — a subject The Editors point out he got paid to teach. Krugman: [...]
March 23, 2010 at 6:16 am
All this means is that, for some reason, Professor Gingrich will get to spend even more air time in The McCain Seat(s) on Sunday Mornings. Fuck.
March 23, 2010 at 6:19 am
Awesome how they can pretend they were all about the Civil Rights Movement back in the day. It was before they welcomed all the Dixiecrats into their party, or something. And hey, Abe Lincoln was a Republican, bitches!
March 23, 2010 at 9:00 am
The South was locked down for the Democratic Party since Andrew Jackson, LBJ gave up the Dixiecrats, and the party I believe in was born. It was a brave move. The Old GOP died when Nixon scrambled down their to get their votes. The Southern Strategy GOP was born, and is still with us as they soaked up the Zell Miller Democrats.
The Democrats were an anti-intellectual party for a long time, see the worst hobbit ever http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodore_G._Bilbo
This is the prize Gingrich covets, now they got ‘em, but they’re dying faster then they’re being replaced. Eisenhower, JFK, saw the future of the US.
March 23, 2010 at 9:03 am
Sound familiar?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodore_G._Bilbo#Firing_the_Professors
The party of dumb-asses, instead of evolving, they pick up our scat and put it in their pockets.
It’s amazing that they got a “peasants for the king” movement going, because it’s a coalition of the poor and the rich, which is not what the Dems were. Hilarious! “Prey for their Predators!”
March 23, 2010 at 9:59 am
Wow. I think someone’s going to find a horse’s head in his bed.
March 23, 2010 at 10:00 am
Oh well, that was supposed to embed this:
http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201003230020
March 23, 2010 at 10:18 am
much as Lyndon Johnson shattered the Democratic Party for 40 years
Yeah, all they managed to do was maintain majorities in one or both houses of Congress for the next thirty years. Sign me up for more of that kind of shattering.
March 23, 2010 at 2:10 pm
Not only that of course, but well LBJ won in ’64, so that’s 4 years. And Carter was four, and Clinton was eight, and, of course, Bush actually didn’t win in 2000 either, not if you used the electoral college and counted the legal votes according to procedure. So that’s 20 out of 40 years already.
March 23, 2010 at 4:04 pm
wouldn’t that be 20 iout of 44?
March 24, 2010 at 5:58 am
the author himself stopped counting at 2004, I imagine since 2006 was a loss.
March 24, 2010 at 9:06 am
Oh, I misread and thought second started in 60 not 64
March 23, 2010 at 11:41 am
Gingrich specifically told Dan Balz “civil rights”. When he called to complain about his words being in print, the Post did not retract them, just gave that footnote.
Now the NY Times feels the need to come in and “correct” Krugman for also directly using Gingrich’s words.
Funny, a couple of hours to correct a true story about Newt, couple of months to correct the abortion ACORN story.
Heckuva job, paper of record!
March 23, 2010 at 5:19 pm
Wow, Buggy. You look just like Squidward from Spongebob. With a bad hangover.
March 24, 2010 at 12:03 am
It’s a terrific likeness.
March 23, 2010 at 12:14 pm
This is good. Up until recently, Gingrich was trying to paint himself as the reasonable alternative to the lunatic right. Apparently that’s not the case.
Won’t stop him, mind you, but it will make centrists think twice about supporting him.
March 23, 2010 at 3:42 pm
Very nicely done, Theeds.
March 23, 2010 at 4:06 pm
My father used to tell me a story about a history course that Gingrich wrote up and sent to some other conservative thinker who was actually a thinker. Apparently said thinker, whose name escapes, was like “yo, dawg, this shit is pretty dumb.” and informed Newtie that George Washington had not, in fact, written the constitution. I never found out if that was true.
March 23, 2010 at 4:10 pm
I forget that the only reason Newt commands any respect is because the Reps ran DUmbya for prez. I forget that the only reason they even exist is to sell ads for Rush Limbaugh.
It’s hard to remember when everything is SO surreal…
March 23, 2010 at 4:48 pm
That’s because it’s never been so surreal.
Which is apparently the way the corporate media likes it. All the freak that’s fit to show!
March 23, 2010 at 5:15 pm
You make dystopia fun!
March 23, 2010 at 5:04 pm
Wikipedia:
Newt Gingrich was born Newton Leroy McPherson, on June 17, 1943, in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, to nineteen-year-old Newton Searles McPherson and sixteen-year-old Kathleen Daugherty, who were married in September 1942. His mother raised him by herself until she married Robert Gingrich, who then adopted Newt. … He married Jackie Battley, his former high school geometry teacher, when he was 19 years old. She was seven years his senior at 26 years old. They had two daughters. The couple decided to divorce after Gingrich told his wife of the affair while she was recovering from cancer surgery.
March 23, 2010 at 5:06 pm
Not that there’s anything wrong with that. Boys marry their high school geometry teachers all the time.
March 23, 2010 at 5:23 pm
Gingrich:
Date Favorable Unfavorable Reference
Nov. 1994 6% 11% [42]
Jan. 1995 10% 23% [43]
Feb. 1995 22% 33% [44]
Dec. 1995 24% 56% [45]
June 1996 25% 57% [46]
April 1997 23% 59% [47]
Jan. 1998 32% ? [48]
July 1998 31% 47% [49]
April 2009 36% 44% [50]
May 2009 30% 47% [51]
June 2009 35% 46% [52]
Imagine how influential he’d be if he’d raped and killed someone. Give him 99.9% disapproval ratings and he’d probably be president?!?
WHY IS THIS MAN PAID ANY ATTENTION OTHER THAN INSULTS?
March 24, 2010 at 3:20 pm
[...] Hark! Someone lit the Texas State Textbook Committee beacon! – [...]
March 25, 2010 at 11:46 am
So the schoolbooks they decide on are probably stored at the Texas State Schoolbook Depository, right?
Just asking.